Untitled

One of the things that western women dislike is the idea of virginity because it is associated with conservative ideals . And I agree with them . I think the concept of virginity as conservatives determined it is nothing but a female sexual objectification to prepare her for private prostitution ( traditional marriage ).

However the contradiction arises when the same women sheer concepts such as " sexual revolution " which gave women a tough time with public prostitution ( yes women in every sexual setup are prostituted to men as passive objects to be acted abon with negotiated " consent " and humiliation sexual rituals, where's the liberation or freedom in that ? ).

Chosen separatism ( actual virginity which has nothing to do with the concept of virginity that conservatives uphold ), is the actual freedom from male sexuality and from objectification and it is a freedom from the thirst trap that nature sets up for women.

When women are forever virgin, they are free from the humiliation of sexuality and aren't compensating their boundaries or " consent ", they don't have to obey their sex drive which makes them stronger and having more self respect. And to be honest with you. I am a hetero women, I have high libido, but men ( straight men especially ) were capable of decreasing my sex drive to the degree, I don't get attracted to men easily nowadays.

Our bodies and hormones are dumb sometimes but it gets smart when we give them the right information and when we stop photoshopping reality. That's why I go insane when I see straight women are still attracted to straight men. Especially when they dropped the mask and showed women their ugly nature. That thing should be more than enough to turn off the female sex drive. I say with a confident tone as a woman with decent libido, there's nothing that moves me sexual towards straight men unless my fantasy to r*pe them and giving them harsh time. And even the latter is decreasing over time and I feel more neutral and sex-less motivated about their existence.

Several reasons:

-feminists have boyfriends/husbands or are promicious

-they believe there are good men

-they get angry when you bring up separatism ("heterophobia!", "I can't change my sexuality!", "I don't want to be lonely!")

-they will hypocritically say that no matter how a woman looks like she's still a woman, while gossipping and hating on gnc women behind their backs

-they will always see women as victims no matter what

-they never allow any talk about the misogyny of women and brush it off as "internalized misogyny" even though it plays a big role in our society and has mental health effects on other women and especially girls, not to mention women helping pedophiles, rapists and serial killers to get victims

-their insistense that every perverted, degenerate woman and women who post porn of themselves are in reality men or women who are exploited by men because they always see women as victims

-they live in an echo chamber were they repeat their dogmas and that's it, no critical thinking allowed

-trying to hold women accountable is always shut down with "don't victim blame!"

-feminism is nothing but a coping strategy about female biology and their desire to fuck men

-feminists make it very clear that they're desperate and can't live without a man and will find every reason to not have to accept that men will never change

-which means that feminism will never liberate girls and women

-their insistence of matriarchy over separatism because it's very obvious that they can't live without getting fucked by men

-and so many more reasons that I have probably forgotten

Loving to Survive: Sexual Terror, Men's Violence, and Women's Lives by Dee L.R. Graham, Edna I. Rawlings, Roberta K. Rigsby (Must read! To give you the gist: “There is nothing like femininity to dignify one’s indignity as one’s identity.” You won't find a better book to thoroughly explore the female 'Cockholm Syndrome'.)

The Myth of Matriarchal Prehistory: Why an Invented Past Won't Give Women a Future by Cynthia Eller

The Inevitability of Patriarchy: Why the Biological Difference Between Men and Women Always Produces Male Domination by Steven Goldberg

Brain Sex: The Real Difference Between Men and Women by Anne Moir, David Jessel

The Mermaid and the Minotaur: Sexual Arrangements and Human Malaise by Dorothy Dinnerstein, Adrienne Harris

Depends on what you mean by distractions. I'm thinking of entertainment media. In that case: Yes, sometimes.

A lot of media is trash. Its funny how people call AI created content "slop", when human created content is mostly slop.

The majority of media is shallow and generic and exists to cater to tired working people to have something to do after work or unintelligent people.

I feel like my life is pointless. I'm a bit nihilistic and due to all of my health problems, life is tiresome and exhausting. I use entertainment media to distract myself from that and the realization how doomed humanity is (capitalism, environment, feminism etc.).

But it's getting more difficult, because I also realized how pointless entertainment media is. Let's be honest, it's a waste of time! A lot of it is generic and stupid. And no, it's not modern entertainment media, as some nostalgic people might say. It has always been like this. A lot of classics are trash! But nowadays there exist so much media compared to back then, that it might seem that way. But when I think about a lot of mangas, books, anime, shows, movies etc. that I have consumed when I was younger, I couldn't really tell you any good ones.

Which doesn't mean that good ones don't exist. I started reading the manga "Atelier of Witch Hat" and I'm loving it. Same with the video game "Clair Obscur: Expedition 33". The worldbuilding, the character and world designs and the dialogue are great! But they also make me realize how much trash there's out here.

I sometimes also consume "slop" when I need a palate cleanser or something quick and relaxing. So I like reading thrillers. A lot of them are mediocre or bad, but they're fun enough I guess. I also listen to music, go to the cinema, museums or art exhibitions.

Still I have become disillusioned with the world we live in and wonder what's the point of it all?

Since a few years now I wanted to try drawing and writing again and I wonder if that might help to distract me better. That's probably would I should do instead of wasting my time consuming mediocre entertainment media. I rarely watch youtube or any streaming services now, so I have more time for other things.

Creating is probably better than consuming.

I don't know if that's what you meant, anon, but I hope I answered your question.

By the way sometimes I wonder what our world would look like without entertainment media. It's crazy how it's such a big "need" for people. People will pirate something because they can't live without it or go buy a vpn to watch a show that's not from their country or complain online about how expensive games, books and streaming services are getting and complain about rich people (the same they're giving their money when consuming/buying media).

I don't give a fuck.

Did the males become pregnant? Did the women penetrate the males when having sex? Did the women have more physical power? Were women never raped?

No?

Feminists will never see the problem with sex and reproduction and that's why feminism will never liberate women. They're too busy coping about being fucked.

with pedophilia, while not all men are pedophiles, a lot of them are; it is very normal, especially when the child is not pre-pubescent. they would certainly not be happy to let pedophiles prey upon their daughters - because they know what pedophiles think and want, because they all have male solidarity, but otherwise they don't care. it doesn't make a difference to them if their fellow men are into children or bondage, it's the same thing to them, and they will turn a blind eye. this is why pedo celebrities suffer no consequences over being outed, their audiences don't care.

one comment in particular bothered me saying that since "nothing is a net good in society" we should let people do anything they want to themselves and others that have "consented" (or that we view as being incapable of consent, ie children, animals, and the environment). what a sad opinion to hold. i can think of plenty of things that are a net good for society: literacy, access to food, shelter, medical care, nature, and public gathering areas. yet building a society that ensures these things for their citizens is impossible because they diminish the "rights" of individuals to pursuing not only their own self destruction, but the destruction of those around them and the environment.

we can't tell people not to torture each other because it's their "right" to orgasm to torturing and being tortured. we can't tell people not to educationally neglect their children and teach them pseudoscience because it's their "right" to raise their children in line with their own backwards views. we can't tell people not to torture and slaughter animals because it's their "right" to have a $2.00 mcdonalds burger. we can't tell people not to cut off healthy body parts electively because it's their "right" to try to force themselves into misogynistic gender roles. we can't tell people not to drive gas guzzling trucks because it's their "right" to drive a 5 ton behemoth to and from soccer practice, nonrenewable resources be damned. we can't tell people not to hand off their children to be raised by the dopamine-receptor-frying social media algorithm because it's their "right" to have "relaxation time" by turning their children into manageable braindead consumers. we can't tell people their unfettered consumerism is enslaving them and that cheap sweatshop trinkets are not going to fill the void in their souls because it's their "right" to buybuybuybuybuy. on and on it goes and if you have a problem with it it's because you're the problem.

(Note: I wrote these posts. Posts and reposts of other peoples related content are in my tags - celibacy, anti natalism, and anti-sexualism. Off-Tumblr links are at the bottom of this post.)

Ask Answered: "Healthy Blackpilled Separatism"

I Comment on Christian Mythology Verses, post 1 and post 2

Can you make the sex math math? They can’t.

Ask Answered: Healing Sexuality into Anti-sexuality is a Process

Ask Answered: Different Connotations of & Miscommunications About Celibacy - "Boring", Alone vs. Lonely

Reasons For Why Romance Doesn’t Work

Long Term Relationships & if I Think Men are Evil

The Joys of Celibacy (poem)

Both Exoteric & Esoteric Truth of Collective Chaotic Reality Creation

Forms of materialistic self-obsession are destroying the world, and sex is the root cause.

Porn Dehumanizes People & Destroys The Spirit, Other Animals Deserve the Planet

If Lesbians & Febfems Procreated and My Related Response to an Anon

A Bit of Tumblr Celibacy "Community" Drama From 2025

Time, Self-Reflection, Women & Men, Freedom: Why Labels Don't Work For Me

Both Men and Women are "Subtly" Pedophilic Trash

A few memes.

Why I'm Against Intercourse

The Desperation of Natalists

~~~

Off-Tumblr Recommended Resources

The Anti-Eroticist

The NEW Antisexual Stronghold

r/antisex

r/antinatalism2 (against arguments about veganism)

Trust Your Perceptions' essay, Semen: Men’s Chemical War Against Women

Stop Non-Consensual Intimate Image Abuse and Take it Down

Audio archives of removed content by separatist women Black Obsidian and Sekhmet She-Owl

*

Books, non-fiction

Sex is not compulsory: Giving up Sex For Better Health and Greater Happiness, by Liz Hodgkinson, 1986

Women, Passion & Celibacy by Sally Cline, 1994

Adam's Curse: A Future Without Men, by Bryan Sykes

Mother Ann Lee: Morning Star of the Shakers, by Nardi Reeder (biography of Shaker founder Ann Lee)

Sexology of the Bible: The Fall and Redemption of Man; a Matter of Sex, by Sidney Calhoun Tapp, 1870

Books, fiction (women-centric, and each with little to no romance)

Mystery novels involving the celibate, historical God-is-both-male-and-female, religious group the Shakers - Sister Rose Callahan Series

Middle-grade / All-ages, surprisingly complex and well written fantasy series - Faerie Tales from the White Forest by Danika Dinsmore

When Women Were Dragons, by Kelly Barnhill and Women are a Dangerous Magic, by Elora Nicole Ramirez

The Longest Night, by Lauren Carter

The Palace of Illusions, by Rowenna Miller

Atlas of Unknowable Things, by McCormick Templeman

The language around sexual abuse has changed a lot in my life time, and yet I am still surrounded by traumatized women. I see women a decade plus younger than me telling very similar stories of harrassment and abuse that my aunties would tell me when I was a child. Why is that?

How many different kinds of rape are men going to invent? (Date rape, marital rape, child rape, coercive rape, rape by deception, maintenance sex, sex work etc..) How many slogans and acronyms about consent are women going to invent? (No-means-no, consent-is-sexy, my-body-my-choice, FRIES, CRISP)

For how long are women going watch men create new psychological jargon and refurbish ancient religious dogma to pathologize women for saying no? For how long are women going to sit and watch men use every new advancement in technology to find new ways to prey and abuse women?

How many generations of women are going to ritualistically trauma bond with each other about being sexual abused? Exactly how many Epsteins and Giseles must exist before we're allowed to question the inherent goodness/neutrality of human sexuality?

Women who can easily decide to risk death in exchange for something as cheap and shallow as male attention, never had any self esteem or inner sense of dignity to begin with.

If men aren't unevolved animals why aren't they EVER holding themselves accountable for their collective abuse of children? Why do they need a multi-generational international feminist re-education campaign in order to "stop"? Meanwhile, they NEVER have any problems collaborating and organizing to profit off of the abuse of children.

Women are not without fault, but we do police each other, especially when it comes to our treatment of children. Women love shaming and micro-policing female caretakers. Female outrage is the ONLY reason it's not socially acceptable to overtly abuse children publicly.

While males have their "bro-code" and are ALWAYS conveniently "unaware" of the child predators in their social circles.

If men aren't unevolved animals, why do we even need an age of consent?

Why do men need the threat of life in jail, the death penalty, and an eternity in hell to de-incentivize them from sexually abusing vulnerable children? And even with all these negative consequences it's not enough to stop them! They just start importing children from another country to abuse.

Why do they need they need sex education in order not to sexually abuse their siblings and classmates out of ignorance? And even with the sex education they don't stop abusing their peers they just become more saavy on how to conceal it?

"We must hold men accountable!"

Maybe women struggle to hold men accountable, because men: cannot be held accountable. Idk, Maybe the simplest more obvious answers are correct??

I'm going fucking insane.

Why prolong the end of the world?