I was wondering something tonight in light of the news that Congress will be investigating Planned Parenthood.  Are there really Catholics who are personally pro-life and publicly pro-choice?  Is that an honest opinion?  The answer, if you can call it that, came to me in the form of a question.  Have I ever seen or heard of personally pro-life Catholics praying in front of abortion clinics?
Have I seen personally pro-life Catholics pushing to hold Planned Parenthood or other abortionists to higher safety standards?
But the truth is that to be pro-anything it can not be a passive stance.  It must be active or it canât be described as âpro,â can it?
In the political sphere, thereâs plenty of so-called personally pro-life Catholics like Rudy Giuliani.  Heâs so personally pro-life that heâs donated to Planned Parenthood.
But it ainât just Rudy. These names ring a bell? Kerry, Schwarzenegger, Dodd, Durban, Leahy, Mikulski, Pelosi, Delahunt, Capuano, Markey, Murkowski, Casey, Collins, McGovern, Meehan, Granholm, Sebelius, Pataki, Pelosi, Richardson, Cellucci, Cuomo, Kucinich, Rangel, and Biden.  All âpersonally pro-life Catholics.â  And thereâs lots more.  You ever hear any of them talk at length about abortion being the taking of a human life?  Any of them?  We see plenty of evidence for the publicly pro-choice part but little to back up the personally pro-life part.
Cardinal Arinze was quoted as saying:
âSomeâŚsay I am personally not in favor of abortion, but I will not impose my views on others. It is like saying, I am personally not in favor of killing youâŚ.But since some people want to shoot all of you in the Senate and the House of Representatives, I wonât impose my views on them, it is pro-choice!
âYou are not serious! This is Divine Law, itâs not a tennis club regulation.â
The personally pro-life but publicly pro-choice argument, as far as I can make out, is thereâs a tiny human being in the womb but donât want to tell you that you canât kill that tiny human being because you donât believe itâs a human being.  Or something.
They seem to love classifying abortion as a religious issue and insist they canât force their religion on others because of the separation of church and state (a pretend benchmark). Â But of course thatâs a bunch of hooey.
The fact is that life begins at conception.  Thatâs science folks.  The pro-aborts are the ones who want everyone to come up with their own timeline as far as this yet another pretend benchmark they call âpersonhood.â  So to them, the right of individual personhood granting ability supersedes any right to life.
Hereâs the thing - I donât believe in âpersonally pro-life.â  Not anymore.  It just strains credulity.  Either you believe itâs the taking of a human life or you donât.  Thereâs no middle ground.  Either you believe in the right to life or you donât.
Personally pro-life is a tactic, not a position.  And it should be called out. When the next 40 Days for Life rolls around, call some personally pro-life Catholics you know and ask them to come with you because you know how strong their âpersonalâ commitment is.  Or offer them a pro-life bumper sticker saying something like âAbortion stops a beating heartâ for their personal hybrid car.  Watch their lips curl and react as if you just handed them a rodent.
Personally pro-life is, at best, neutral about life, in which case you just donât care about protecting life.  As Holocaust survivor Elie Wiesel wrote, âWe must take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim.  Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented.â  If youâre making a distinction between personally pro-life and publicly pro-choice youâre indistinguishable from the oppressors.
Read more: http://www.ncregister.com/blog/matthew-archbold/the-myth-of-the-personally-pro-life-catholic/#ixzz1ZHI5k3HK