a dime and i'm the same on both sides

Do you think after they send the taumeoba samples to Venus and the apocalypse is averted, there are people back on Earth who are like "See, this is why we should pay teachers more"

The United Educators of San Francisco do a press release at some point that's like "Former UESF union member Dr. Ryland Grace has officially saved the planet, proving once again that teachers are undervalued"

#however long round trip transmission time takes they get a message from Grace: #former?? :( (via @one-true-houselight)

You can write a fandom wiki from an in-universe perspective, or you can have your fandom wiki adhere to Wikipedia citation standards, but you cannot do both. Trying to have it both ways is how you end up with articles that hedge on whether penises exist in-universe because no canon media directly addresses the topic.

Are you sure about that? https://tardis.wiki/wiki/Penis

I don't feel like Doctor Who is any sort of exception to the general principle here; even having nine hundred episodes spread over sixty years to draw from and copious licensed prose besides, trying to cite from an in-universe perspective still results in a model of the world with all sorts of strange gaps in it. I will, however, give it full credit that the in-universe existence of penises is not one of those gaps.

I see this as less a downside and more part of the fun. See also, the Transformers wiki being unsure if Jesus is the same person as Christ and whether or not he's worshipped as a deity, and concluding that based on limited available information he might just be a metaphor for Optimus Prime.

I don't disagree that it can be a lot of fun. However, I'm of the firm opinion that once you've reached the point of speculating based on the preponderance of textual evidence that Jesus Christ is a mythologised version of Optimus Prime, what you are writing is not an informational wiki article; it is fanfic with a very specific format screw.