Pretend I Wrote Something Funny Here

The older this gets the funnier it is

Love wins 🥰

"why is this person drawing sexualized art of hatsune miku, isn't hatsune miku canonically 16?" hatsune miku is a voice bank. she's pretty much an electronic piano that goes Oo Ee Oo. hatsune miku is not a person with a life. nobody is doing CSAM of hatsune miku, because hatsune miku is not a C you can do M featuring SA about. that's a glorified slide whistle on the compyooter. you cannot psychologically abuse a theremin. it's generally agreed to be impossible to traumatize a harmonica. hatsune miku is a nonsapient synthesizer software addon. you can't do child abuse to a nonsapient synthesizer software addon. you cannot. do. child abuse. to a nonsapient. synthesizer. software addon. hello hello hello can anyone hear me

do you understand that drawing a picture of a cartoon software mascot in a swimsuit is a different type of action from abusing a child. that's not the same kind of thing. those are two different types of action. there is no connection between those actions. if someone draws a boob that person is not now guilty of assaulting a minor. do you understand. do you understand. do you understand. do you understand.

i understand, why are they drawing it though? it's still kinda weird

why should I give a fuck. who cares

it's been over a month since I made this post and I swear to god 80% of the responses are people saying "yeah I agree" and then 10% are people saying "drawing smut of this bassoon cartoon is basically child sexual abuse material" and the other 10% are people saying "as someone who was sexually abused as a child it's honestly really offensive for people to compare bassoon cartoon smut to my trauma"

y'know someone reblogged this to accuse me of defending CSAM. truly the piss on the poor website

You’re asking me to look to Europe, a continent steeped in antisemitism with over a millennium’s worth of history of discrimination, persecution, forced conversion, pogroms, and mass slaughters of Jews (to say nothing of the Holocaust), as some sort of neutral moral arbiter of the Israel-Palestine conflict?

See you have a basic point that the rule was a bit over exaggerated but I feel like you’ve missed that language reflects the culture that speaks that language. Old words get removed from common context for being insensitive all the time. It’s why we don’t call Native Americans Indians or Black People Coloureds anymore among other examples. If these words are still in common use it’s a sign that the culture that uses them doesn’t disapprove of those sentiments.

Except those cultures also disapprove of those sentiments. Those are also not common phrases and they are seen as very offensive.

Nobody is going to comment about the fact that the term 'Judas' meaning traitor is actually specifically derived from Judas Iscariot? Like, it's not a general term, it's a specific biblical reference, to the SPECIFIC individual said to have betrayed Jesus to the Romans in the New Testament, to receive a bounty for the act?

If multiple different peoples developed such a word for a swindler separately, maybe they were getting swindled.

her eyes were the sickly green of the sky before a tornado, and to his horror he discovered she could throw cows around just as easily

to his horror? weak shit. outta my way gayboy im boutta get it