We are a system of sixteen individuals, five of whom are otherkin in some way, but all(?) of us are nonhuman to some extent. We've not been diagnosed with DID or OSDD, nor will we be. We don't experience amnesia and most of our dissociative episodes are probably better explained by depression, but we're sure as shit plural! (Read on for the full intro.)
We are:
K - it/its, wolfdog therian, represented by the colour orange - find K's sideblog at @kaeynine
M - they/them, wolf holothere, represented by a light blue - find M's sideblog at @myriadmanes
Q - she/her, nonhuman, represented by dark green
R - he/him, syskid (somewhere between 12 and 16, but assume he's towards the higher end of that scale at any given moment), represented by dark grey
V - she/her, polymorph(??), represented by pink
X - he/him, starkin, represented by some mixture of purples, violets, dark blues - colours on the spacekin flag, essentially
Slim Jim - he/him, syspet (if that's even a term??), just straight up a slugcat from Rain World, specifically modelled after Survivor, the white slugcat
4881, or Abbi, (formerly α-β / Alpha-Beta) - she/it, nonhuman, currently undecided on what precise flavour of nonhuman fits it best ("robot" feels too simplistic, "artificial intelligence" makes it feel inauthentic), represented by some combination of black, white and a light green
☽ (Silver) - she/her, Susie Deltarune fictive (but call her Silver if you don't know us), represented by purple - find Silver's sideblog at @silver-slash-susie
Noelle - she/her, (again not surprisingly) Noelle Holiday fictive
Salem & Dane - a subsystem? Identical twins? Both use he/it, represented by black and red - find Salem's sideblog at @escapees-from-omelas
Clover - she/her, syskid
Fiver - it/its - find Fiver's sideblog at @fiverrrrr
Luz/Luce - she/her, Luz Noceda fictive
(at a certain point this is going to get hard to keep fully up-to-date...)
We intend on (eventually) posting some comics and such on here for the more lighthearted things we have to say, but we're also working on making some art, zines, poetry and such which we'll be posting sooner, so keep an eye out for that.
This blog, and the people who post on it, are emphatically supportive of all systems regardless of origin. We're not going to split hairs on whose existence is valid and whose isn't, and if you need us to explain why, block us.
Our tags:
#bright's original creations for our, well, original content
#bright's high effort content for our original content that's made with more purpose (think zines or anything with proper artistic expression)
#bright's rambles for our longer-form text posts that aren't quite essays
#bright's essays for our... essays. Look, these tags are self-explanatory.
#plural stuff for all of our posts about plurality (in case you don't want to see the occasional non-plurality-related stuff we post or reblog)
#shitpost for our highest-effort content
#asks answered for the asks we've answered
#ask game for ask games we've reblogged and interacted with
#zines for both zines we've made and zines we've reblogged
#reblogs for-- you get it.
and a separate tag for each of our members when they post, in the format of #[name] speaks
("All plural experiences are welcome" banner is from this post by Not Applicable)
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality✓ Free Actions
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
hey! sorry for taking so long to respond to this one, we didn't have anything jumping at us and had to think of something. (the ask game in question can be found here)
What have you tried that didn't work for your system? Why didn't it work? Do you do something else instead?
there's not much to say here, but apps for tracking switches like simplyplural. we guess those tools are better for systems who experience memory issues (which we don't), so we didn't get much out of them. we think excessively tracking switches may have caused some involuntary switches here and there too. we've not really 'replaced' that with anything because we don't have much of a need to track it all. sorry that wasn't terribly interesting!
this is v answering this btw! i don't think i've been around for a LONG time or maybe at all on this blog yet. happy to answer some more questions while i'm around if people are curious!
a hastily made comic because I’ve been Having A Time. mostly for people who already know what systems are/what polyfragmented means (cuz I didn’t explain it) but feel free to show anyone who you think needs it
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality✓ Free Actions
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
🛹 (skateboard) - Is there an accomplishment that you're proud of?
from: jasper of @dragonmintmp4
CW for discussion of mental health.
We're maybe stretching the definition of “accomplishment” here, but we're proud of the work we've been able to do on our mental health, especially over the past year. We're still by no means perfect in terms of our mental health, but we're in a far better place than we once were.
We used to be exceptionally socially anxious, to the point where we would avoid going to the shops unless we knew as a matter of fact we'd be able to use a self-checkout till, and any social interactions with people we were not familiar with which we had not very rigorously prepared for would have given us a panic attack. It got bad enough at one point that we became agoraphobic for a few weeks and did not leave the house except for a few minutes each week to do shopping, which was terrifying. Our social anxiety isn't totally gone today but it's nowhere near as bad today as it was a year ago.
Our depression has gotten better too. Maybe part of that is being medicated. Maybe part of that is having our first good therapist, and one who has been very understanding of us being plural and of otherkin identities, to boot. Maybe part of it is The Thing We Won't Talk About Mind Your Own Business. It's probably all three.
Being plural, in part, has really significantly helped with our mental health. Ever since we started juggling workdays, it's been far easier to cope with work (and people have had more time to front, where they otherwise would not have time). More than that, though, we care for each other in ways other people never could. We understand each other. We're always there for each other. And it helps that we're all as weird as each other, in our own ways.
There are still ways in which we all struggle, but we're working on it. We know now that we have all of the tools we need to solve our problems, which is certainly more than we had a year ago. The future is bright (pun intended).
Hi! I made another ask game since folks liked the last one. This one is oriented towards folks who've been plural for a while and would like to talk about how their plural experience has changed over time. However, there are no rules around how old or experienced you and your system have to be. If these questions resonate with you, then you can participate!
As before, all systems are welcome to participate as long as you respect the spirit of the post and don't drag discourse onto it. Feel free to copy and paste this wherever with or without credit, a bunch of these questions were lifted from other places anyway. I tried to pick or at least phrase questions to be as inclusive as possible, but I've almost certainly missed things - plurality is diverse and my system only experiences a small corner of it. I encourage people to make their own ask games!
🚂 (train) - How has your understanding of yourselves, and of plurality in general, changed over time?
⛵ (sailboat) - What are some things that were important to you that no longer are? Or things that weren't important to you that are now?
⛴️ (ferry ship) - What changes in the plural community have you observed over your time there?
🚌 (bus) - How has your system specifically changed over time? What about individual members? (If they want to answer!)
✈️ (airplane) - What's something about your system now that would have surprised your younger selves? How do you feel about it in the present?
🚁 (helicopter) - Which things have gotten easier with time? Which things are still hard? (Examples: doubt, communication, conflict resolution, and so on)
🛹 (skateboard) - Is there an accomplishment that you're proud of?
🛴 (kick scooter) - What's some advice that you would give to your younger selves? What would have helped you the most back when you were new to plurality?
🚕 (taxi) - What would you tell or ask your future selves? What are you still trying to learn?
🏍️ (motorcycle) - What have you tried that didn't work for your system? Why didn't it work? Do you do something else instead?
🚲 (bicycle) - What does day-to-day life look like for you all now, compared to back when you were new to plurality?
🚀 (rocket) - What future do you all want for yourselves?
Plural Catch-22: the path to happiness is lined with people who will call you fake for trying to walk it.
Fuck them. Walk it anyway.
Image ID in alt text and under the cut.
Image one:
Red, drawn repeatedly in boxes where she experiences intense suffering: "Why am I more palatable to the Average Joe if I paint myself crying and (censored) and suffering and dying a thousand times over than if I draw my system smiling?"
Part of the system is drawn smiling: Red, Hawthorne, and Gwen.
Image two:
"It's pathologization, of course."
A drawing of Red as the Vitruvian Man, wings and tail and broken halo extended, head duplicated. Figure one: the broken must suffer to be broken in a way that matters. Figure two: if you're not suffering, then I can ignore you. Figure three: if you're weird and happy, then you're a lying, cheating bitch who deserves to be hung in the public square.
"If you're not normal, then you're suffering."
"If you're not suffering, then you're normal. Get with the program and stop pretending you're strange."
Image three:
Red, sitting curled up and turned away, broken halo and a devil's tail. "I hate it. I hate that most of the Western, colonized world sees my existence as inherently awful. I hate that my existence is still something to cure. I hate that a system broadcasting their trauma is treated as more real than one broadcasting their joy."
See, what bothers me is the double standard of it all. We're sick if we're multiple and miserable. We're liars if we're multiple and happy. We were never multiple at all if we fuse, and people will take every chance they get to prove we were faking it in the first place. You're damned if you do, damned if you don't, and double-damned if you try something else.
What does anyone want from us? For us to shut up and disappear so you can call us fake again? For us to drag ourselves over hot coals until we're in enough pain to satisfy you? For us to wring out every drop of our trauma history for your entertainment, just so you can discard us the second you have a different opinion about anything at all?
The plural community's not exempt from this issue. You know which systems get reblogged the most? Which systems get their words taken as Expert Advice? Who gets heard, who gets thought of, who gets boosted? Have you ever noticed that some systems are palatable and others aren't, and that people regularly throw the unpalatable systems in harm's way to justify their own reality as "one of the good ones?"
Do you really think Western medicine thinks any of us are "the good ones?" There are no good madmen, only quiet ones.
#yyyup! #OP let me know if i'm diverging from the original intended meaning of your post too much here #but i feel like this phenomenon intersects with our transfemininity #in the sense that “transfem” one of the less acceptable types of system to be on sysblr. #we operate under the assumption that our blog is temporary and conditional. #it feels like it's pretty much inevitable that one day we'll say the wrong thing and everyone will dogpile us for it. #like for example: maybe we talk in-depth about ageplay and get pedojacketed as a result. #all of a sudden we've lost the public's favor! we were a bad apple all along! ohhh i always knew something was up with her! #that's not a type of system we respect! she doesn't get to represent systemhood! we're good systems unlike her. #anyway#let's all push forward together and back each other up when we get hate for it alright?
You're spot on. Trans and queer systems (doubly so for transfem systems, especially here on Tumblr Dot Staff-Misogyny), disabled systems who can't be "aesthetic" about their disabilities, Black and Indigenous systems who dare to be themselves online, systems with littles who don't want to live in the sexless safe box or adults who can't handle it all, systems struggling with "inconvenient" symptoms and comorbidities, systems who show the "wrong" kinds of suffering, systems with hostile members or infighting that affects outside people, systems who've been fused or want fusion, systems who don't want fusion, median systems, polyfragmented systems, tiny systems, systems that don't fit the American medical model of "DID or bust (with a totally dysfunctional, miserable, fusion-craving system of 5-15 people that has maybe one fictional introject at most)", systems that don't fit the current community notion of what's normal or common...
Plenty of people don't fit the palatable system mold, especially if they're dealing with other systemic bullshit like racism and transmisogyny and ableism, and too many systems get harassed off the internet or lolcowed for it. Doubly so if we find ways to be happy with ourselves. And it's absolute bullshit.
The only palatable system is a white, abled, patriarchy-friendly-while-arguably-being-against-systemic-discrimination system that never fucks up in any meaningful way, never contradicts itself or disagrees, is distinct enough to be neatly stereotyped and categorized (unless it's more convenient to other people if they can treat you like you're not plural at all, in which case it doesn't matter), never does anything challenging or weird or inconvenient unless other people benefit from it, never takes up space or celebrates their existence because they're only ever miserable in the ways other people enjoy watching, only ever parades their trauma for the public's entertainment without presenting anything based in systemic problems, and disappears the moment their suffering isn't inspirational or scientifically interesting.
Made a mistake, said the wrong thing, hurt someone, displeased a stranger? Too bad, palatable systems don't do that, and no one ever learns from mistakes. Get banned. Get harassed. Get fakeclaimed. I see it every day. I see it every week. Someone is always the butt of the joke, even in the inclusive community. Someone is always the scapegoat. Someone gets posted on a website and doxxed for the crime of existing inconveniently for the status quo.
It's bullshit.
None of us are "the good ones" to other people. None of us are as palatable as anyone wants to think we are. Bob on the street still sees us all as serial killers, permanent victims, liars, freaks, nutjobs, all of the above. Sally at the store thinks we're a conspiracy theory. Psychology professors still sometimes teach that the existence of any sort of plurality is a hoax (ask how I know). The spaces that are supposed to accept us still regularly tell us to shut up and go to therapy, always assuming that therapy matches our values and goals, that therapy is available at all. (And fuck you if you have trauma from psychiatry, apparently.)
I want a world where we stop beating the shit out of each other and ourselves trying to fit a mold that doesn't exist. I want to see the plural community start working together for once in our fucking lives instead of infighting over shit that Bob and Sally don't care about for the next twenty years.
So damn it, I've got your back. Let me know if you ever want to chat, or if you want backup contact info somewhere less likely to ban someone for being a trans woman in public.
There's a paradox in a lot of plural spaces. System kids are welcome, but only if they're Literal Children who stay in child-only soft boxes where they can be ignored. If a kid wants to have an adult conversation, then they're spoken over, pushed away, or otherwise discounted more often than not- and if they're accepted, then it's often at the cost of expecting them to have absolutely no childlike qualities to "prove" that they're mature enough to stay around. We even see this pattern within systems sometimes.
What are systems without adult members supposed to do if the only place system kids can talk is in the Super Soft Safe Box? What about system kids who want to talk about theoretical physics or drugs or sex or a thousand other taboos? What about kids who function as adults? And what about system kids who are kids but don't want to live their lives in the Super Soft Safe Box like the world expects them to?
Acceptance of system kids as being wildly different from each other in mindset and ability is improving, but we still have a long way to go in treating system kids with a shred of respect and decency in wider plural spaces.
Not to mention... why is there so much intense focus on mental age as some universal concept in the first place? It feels like a lot of the plural community takes the concept of mental age as a given without considering where that idea comes from, how it affects how they treat others, and how it interacts with systemic discrimination and ableism. It can sometimes be a useful construct if approached critically, but I see so little critical thought about it.
If you want some reading on the topic, one of the articles cited is worth at least a skim- it's a fairly good surface overview of eugenics and its tie to IQ/mental age, immigration, racism, ableism, etc.
ID below the cut with the full quotes- sorry to alt texters, I fit as much as I could in there but the text limit is real.
[Image one ID begins:]
There's a subtle sort of discrimination to how a lot of plural spaces treat system kids/littles. Especially those in adult bodies, or with a particularly large gap from their body's age.
"Littles must always be supervised in online spaces or else they'll bother adults and be preyed upon." "There must be an adult in your system if you're bodily an adult- they should handle life while the kids go away to never be seen by adults again. Littles should only talk to other littles. Anything else is unsafe and sometimes pedophilic. Right?" "Littles shouldn't be in charge. They're supposed to be cared for by everyone else and kept out of sight." "You're welcome here! You just have to only ever talk in the Baby Zone that no adults ever visit to talk to you. Yeah, it's empty and no one will answer. But you want to talk, right?" "Sorry sweetie, the adults are talking and you can't be here. Even if you're capable of understanding, consenting, etc. You're not allowed to be here with us if you're not a real adult." "Littles can't take care of themselves or handle any adult responsibilities, ever!" "Is there an adult I can talk to?"
Blue, an anthro cat sitting down, looks angry at the above phrases.
What are adult-bodied systems with no "brain adults" supposed to do? Drawing of a family of stick figures, all of whom are either child-short or hunching to be shorter.
What about systems whose caretakers are their children? Systems where there is no older person to supervise? Systems finding ways to live an adult life when no one inside aligns with it? What are you supposed to do when a 5-year-old does your taxes and drives you home?
"Just grow up." Do I get a choice, or are you ripping that away from me too?
[End image one ID.]
[Begin image two ID.]
Why is "mental age" the bar people are using to decide whether someone is worthy of autonomy and respect, anyway? Where does the concept of mental age come from in the first place, and why does it exist?
From Wilson, R. A. (2024). Eugenic Thinking and the Cognitive Sciences. In M. C. Frank & A. Majid (Eds.), Open Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.21428/e2759450.c9a5f080:
"Eugenic traits:
Prominent among the eugenic traits found in sterilization laws were those concerning cognitive ability and mental health. These traits, ordered in terms of their frequency in U.S. state and Canadian provincial sterilization laws, included feeble-mindedness, insanity, epilepsy, criminality, imbecility, idiocy, sexual perversion (or depravity), mental unfitness (or deficiency), and moral depravity (or degeneracy). As this listing suggests, these laws especially targeted those perceived to have some kind of cognitive limitation or psychiatric condition on the grounds that they were unfit and would propagate these eugenic traits to their children; approximately 70% of all eugenic traits mentioned in sexual sterilization laws in the United States and Canada concerned cognitive ability or mental health. Given this, there was a clear role for psychologists in programs of eugenic sterilization, given their expertise in psychological testing (Rose, 1985). Such testing and subsequent sterilization were conducted through emerging forms of institutionalization, such as “training schools for the feeble-minded,” especially as eugenics gained state-level backing (Miller et al., 2015).
One of the roles of psychologists was to develop ways to measure those who were cognitively or psychiatrically subnormal. Emerging intelligence tests were adapted to quantify and classify those deemed “feeble-minded”or “mentally deficient” (Thomson, 1998; Trent, 1994). Binet’s famous test of intelligence, for example, incorporated the more specific existing folk categories of “imbecile” and “idiot,” adapting these to designate developmentally delayed children with mental ages, respectively, of 3–7 and 2 years. Following the translation of Binet’s test from French into English by Henry Goddard in 1908, “moron” was coined in 1910 to pick out those in the general population with a putatively fixed mental age of 8–12 years. This resulted in a three-tiered schema of intellectual subnormality—moron, imbecile, idiot—that came to be widely used in the eugenics movement.
In the hands of the psychologist Lewis Terman, what became the Stanford-Binet test initially was deployed in selecting army recruits near the end of World War I (1914–1918) before being used on the general population. The three-tiered scheme was accordingly fed into the newly minted idea of an intelligence quotient (IQ) that remains with us 100 years on, with the fixed mental ages of moron, imbecile, and idiot mapped onto standard deviations from a normalized IQ of 100. From the 1920s, these tests were widely used to identify children who were candidates for eugenic sterilization, whether they were already housed in segregated institutions or within the regular school system or general community."
From Asilverm, & Asilverm. (n.d.). What’s My Age Again: Why Mental Age Theory Hurts People with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. Retrieved May 31, 2026, from https://www.disabilitywisdom.com/2018/12/21/whats-my-age-again-why-mental-age-theory-hurts-people-with-intellectual-and-developmental-disabilities/:
The concept of “mental age” was first introduced by Alfred Binet, co-creator of the first IQ tests, in the early twentieth century. Generally, “mental age” has been measured by comparing an individual’s score on a standardized IQ test with the average performance of their same-age peers. For people with IDD, “mental age” may also be estimated by comparing the person’s demonstrated physical, speech, adaptive or cognitive skills against the average for various age groups.
Not surprisingly, “mental age” came about alongside the eugenics movement in the United States. Mental ages were used to classify various groups of “feebleminded” individuals by severity: Adults with a mental age of 9-12 years were classified as “morons”; those with a mental age of 6-8 years were classified as “imbeciles”; and those with a mental age of 2-5 were classified as “idiots.” Individuals from any of these groups were thought unfit to reproduce."
A drawing of Blue looks annoyed and concerned. It's labelled, "TFW it's eugenics again. :("
Oh yeah. Why is it always eugenics?
To be clear: I'm not saying anyone is ableist or practicing eugenics for having a sense of their own internal age. I am pointing out how systemic ableism affects how system kids are treated, how the concept of mental age stems from ableism in the first place, and how terribly many cultures treat children and deemed-children to begin with: how children and disabled people are often regarded as objects, burdens, or annoyances who don't know enough to have a say about their own needs. Is this really how we want to assume all system kids should be treated? How anyone should be treated?
How much of how system kids are treated ties back to some form of ableism, in the end? I wonder about this a lot and I feel like I never see people talk about it.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality✓ Free Actions
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
I've seen people describe their headmates as family or roommates or coworkers or strangers. For us it's like everyone is a member of a small town community. There are enough of us that we can't all be close ever. But like we're mostly all on a first name basis and wave to each other (or hide when we meet in "public"). There are several moments where we go "huh I think I went to high school with that guy" but don't really KNOW another alter. But there are also groups who are close friends. Like yeah we all know the one alter who loiters outside the convenience store and we give him change for headspace cigarettes. He's very important to the eco system of our small town. Don't ask too many questions, he will front and throw hands.
Hey, if you’re disabled (of any kind), Mad/Insane, or “undiagnosed but there’s definitely something happening”, please come read this.
Especially if you’re a disabled transfemme. I know that as of writing, we’ve had a shitty couple days.
And if y’all can share it otherwise, whether that’s reblogging this or sending the link to the disabled/mad/whatever we are people in your life, I’d really appreciate it.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality✓ Free Actions
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming