Beatle communication via code, music & telepathy
We met at Forthlin Road
And wrote a secret code
To never be spoken
I stand by what I said
The promise that I made
Will never be broken
Paul McCartney - Days We Left Behind
A lot of what we, The Beatles, did was very much in an enclosed scene. Other people found it difficult - even John's wife, Cynthia, found it very difficult - to penetrate the screen that we had around us. As a kind of safety barrier we had a lot of 'in' jokes, little signs, references to music; we had a common bond in that and it was very difficult for any 'outsider' to penetrate. That possibly wasn't good for relationships back then.
Paul McCartney ā From āThe Beatles Anthologyā book, 2000
There was no point asking if they [the Beatles] really got on together. Itās obvious they do. When one makes a joke, the others roar with laughter. They have their own āinsideā language when they want to keep something private. Mrs. Lennon says they tease her with it all the time. And theyāve been together so much, sometimes they donāt even have to talk in code. As Paul says, āwe can just read each otherās thought waves.ā
Steve Brandt, ā7 DAYS and 7 NIGHTS WITH THE BEATLES.āĀ Photoplay MagazineĀ (July 1964)
JOHN: We have met some new people since we've become famous, but we've never been able to stand them for more than two days. Some hang on a bit longer, perhaps a few weeks, but that's all. Most people don't get across to us.Ā We can't go around with anybody for a long time unless they are a friend, because we're so closely knit.Ā We talk in code to each other. We always did when we had strangers around us...
PAUL: If there was someone disastrous in the dressing room (because, occasionally, someone would get in who was a right pain and we didn't have time for all of that) we would have little signs. We'd say 'Mal...' and yawn, and that would be the sign to get rid of them. It was a very 'in' scene.
Malcolm Searle would be the last to complain - he, too, had fine moments with them as the tour progressed. His is a name that stays with me,Ā because I made it a code-word for breaking up interviews.Ā In order to protect the visitorās feelings and also to relieve Paul (for it was usually Paul, the most consistently willing to undertake public relationships) of all responsibility for termination of the interview, I would say: āPaul, I know you could go on talking for hours/till the cows come home/till goats learn to play the tenor sax - but Malcolm Searle is still waiting for the interview you promised him. He's being very patient [as indeed he always was] but he has a deadline...ā
Fifty Years Adrift, Derek Taylor (1984)
Iām a smoke-screen expert since John got shot. I lie all the time. Itās the price of fame. I used to laugh at that, but thereās a price for everything. We have code names in the family for places we own or like to go to, and youāll never see photographs of my kids.ā
Interview for Evening Standard The Gospel According to Paul
The Beatles were about humour, we had a great humour between us. There was an 'in' side to the track of humour that we would use as a protective thing.
Paul McCartney, Many Years From Now
"We've a very tight school, the Beatles. We're like a machine that goes boom, boomchick, chickboom, each of us with our own little job to do. We're just like dogs who can hear high-pitched sounds that humans can't. We can be talking to some character and, suddenly, if he becomes a drag, we can all put the shutters up, freeze him out and he would never know. It's amazing. Like radar. I can pick up Ringo's mood just by looking at him. It's our own mutual protection mechanism. If we didn't have it, we'd fall apart."
The Daily Mirror: The one that bites ā Donald Zec dissects Mr J. Lennon. (March 1965)
JOHN: Well, because of the situation weāre in, and I often express myself through song, or mainly through song, somebody can have ā letās call itā Letās say heās a brother of mine, in the family. Now, if two brothers argue and fight, for whatever reason, or even ā write, the only way they can express themselves, because theyāre not artists, is either through letters or through dialogue. One brother goes away to sea, not because they had a fight, but because he was going away to sea anyway. The last thing they did was have an argument. He, the brother away at sea ā letās call that me, ācause I went to America ā might write to his brotherā¦
Paul, you could say, his lyrics are very sort of... non-specific ā if one knows the person, one knows what is coming down. You know, you can read whatās being saidā
John Lennon, April 16th, 1973 (Beverly Hills Hotel, Los Angeles)
"Though thinking of Paul caused John pain, he could never get McCartney out of his head; Pau's music was everywhere, and it always made him jealous, even the songs he enjoyed. In Bermuda, John was listening to all kinds of things on the radio, not just the Muzak and classical he listened to in New York. "Coming Up," Paul's hit single from McCartney II, was unavoidable. Every time he tuned in the BBC or one of the local stations, there it was. It began to drive John crackers. Paul was calling for a Beatles reunion, and every word of the song was addressed directly to him. Ultimately, he came to admire it and draw inspiration from it. The small room next door to the master bedroom had been converted to a two-track recording studio complete with rhythm box. To get into gear for the demo tape, John played "Coming Up" on his guitar over and over, sometimes improvising his own words, sometimes singing Paul's words, which spoke of peace and the possibility of again playing music together."
Nowhere Man: The Final Days of John Lennon
āBut it was very painful, a bad period, there was a lot of deep messages in all the stuff we did then. I was really writing a lot of songs to John.ā
"Iām quite private. Why should people, know my innermost thoughts? Thatās for me, their innermost. But in a song, thatās where you can do it. Thatās the place to put them. You can start to reveal truths and feelings. You know, like in āHere Todayā where Iām saying to John āI love youā. I couldnāt have said that, really, to him. But you find, I think, that you can put these emotions and these deeper truths ā and sometimes awkward truths; I was scared to say āI love youā.
Paul, BBC 4ās Mastertapes (2016)
Oh, for what itās worth, no less than John Lennon loved the song. I spent a long time talking to [photographer] Bob Gruen once, it was great as we talked about a lot of stuff that he doesnāt usually get grilled on. One of the things that came up was the times he spent with John listening to the radio. Bob singled this song out as one he and John would listen to and how much John loved the song. John took the song quite personally, and saw it as Paul sending a message to him: āYeah, I know you think I only write silly love songs, but I love you.ā Bob said John specifically mentioned the āI love youā refrain as being a message from Paul to him. We can speculate all we want, but I have no reason to doubt the word or memory of a guy who sat in the Dakota bedroom with John and listened to this song with him.
gswan, c/o Steve Hoffman Music Forums. (October 28th, 2010)
JOHN: Because Iām human, and I get irritated, and I get angry. And I got so furious when I heard Ram the first time that I just wrote the song.
REPORTER: You were furious because you donāt think the level of music isā?
JOHN: No, I was furious because of ā thereās messages to me and the others in it! Uh, the āToo Many Peopleāā
YOKO: āYou made the first mistake.ā
JOHN: āāYou made the first mistakeā, all those lines are directly to us. It aināt paranoia, itās directed to us. Like, I think āDear Friendā is it⦠But we met the other week and we decided to stop it all, you know? Because weād both had enough. The four of us have ā I mean, including the wives. Yes, sorry?
February?, 1972: At a press conference to announce plans for a possible tour backed by Elephantās Memory
HINDLE: What do you think about language?
JOHN: I think itās a bit crummy, you know? It is a drag form of communication, really. Weāll get ā weāll get telepathy. I believe that.
HINDLE: You believe that?
JOHN: Yeah, sure. Sure. Sure as anything I believe. Itās too⦠Because now we need it so much. [ā¦] There are ā thereās people everywhere of the same mind and itās just⦠even amongst ourselves we canāt communicate. Which is the hard bit, you know.
HINDLE: Yeah.
JOHN: Amongst the people that sort of really agree.
HINDLE: Just ācause of words?
JOHN: Just ācause of words, and upbringing, and attitude, and how you express your⦠Well, itās just some ā youāve got to find a mutual sort of language to express yourself, you know? And my language is thatā
HINDLE: Unless you fall in love itās impossible to communicate like that.
JOHN: I mean, I wasnāt in love last year, but I was communicating quite well with people. Not as well, or maybe not as powerfully. āCause now thereās two of us, doing that, brrmmm, whatever it is. Sending out a vibration or whatever. But before it was me and⦠or me and George, alright, or whatever it was; we werenāt in love, but. You know. Thereās enough in you to shove it out. It is just that bit. If you ā if somebody comes in a room and heās uptight and that, he can make the whole room uptight.
John Lennon, interviewed by Maurice Hindle (December 1968).
JOHN: [āHow Do You Sleepā]ās not serious. Like, if Paul was really, really hurt by it, Iāll sooā Iāll know by the vibes, come round. Even if he doesnāt call, well, Iāll explain it to him. Iāll even write to him, you know. If he really really thinks itās ā thinks itās really really serious.
September 9th, 1971 (St Regis Hotel, New York)
KANE: Do you ever have any, uh ā this is another controversial question ā any internal problems within The Beatles? Letās say the four guys, youāre bound to have differences. Have any serious internal problems ever upset you?
JOHN: [pause] Um⦠We get plenty ofā
KANE: Itās a tough question to ask.
JOHN: It isnāt tough, because we can manage them. Because we have plenty of arguments, but weāre also so attuned to each other, and we know each other so well, through the years, that an argument never reaches a climax. Or it never reaches the point where somebody goes off ācause theyāre done talking, you know.
KANE: In other words, itās forgotten.
JOHN: Itās not forgotten. But we know each other so well, itās like sort of mind-reading. If an argumentās building up between Ringo and I, say, there comes to a point where we know whatās coming next and itās all ā everybody packs in. Or something ā some, āOkay, he wins,ā you know. So we have ordinary arguments, like other people, but we donāt ā thereās no sort of conflict. All the people who have conflict in show business either get married about nineteen times, they leave the group theyāre in and go solo⦠and nothing ever happens.
John Lennon and Ringo Starr, interviewed by Larry Kane (2 September 1964).
NEIL: Iād just rather not say anything. Itās one of those situations.
PAUL: Yeah. [pause] Well, thatās ā thatās the trouble you see, there, ācause thatās it. Itās like, with our ā heightened awareness, the answer is not to say anything, you know. But it isnāt. āCause I mean, we screw each other up totally if we donāt do that. āCause weāre not ready for your heightened⦠vows of silence. [laughs; hapless] Weāre really not! Like, we donāt know what the fuck each otherās talking about, when that ā we all just sort of getā
NEIL: I think itās just between the four of you, that get it. Thatās what Iād pretend.
PAUL: Oh yeah, right, yeah. But you see, thatās it, thatās why John doesnāt say anything. āCause he, you know, he just⦠There was something the other day, when I said, āWell, what do you think?ā And he just stood there and didnāt say anything. And then ā and I know exactly why, you know. I mean, I wouldnāt, if⦠[long pause] Somehow. You know, thereās nothing really much to be said about it. You just ā we all just have to do it, and all that, instead of like talking about it. But ā but if one of us is talking about it, itās a drag if the other three arenāt. Because then it sort of throws you off. [inaudible; voice marking tape slate] I mean, weāve just been talking about it now for a few years, you know. Like thisā¦
From the Get Back sessions (13 January 1969).
JOHN: Hey! Did you dream about me last night?
PAUL: [long pause] I canāt remember.
JOHN: Very strong dream. We both dreamt about it. It was amazing! Different dreams, you know, but I thought you mustāve been there. [inaudible] I was touching you. [inaudible]
PAUL: Nothing to worry about, though?
JOHN: Nothing to worry about, no.
PAUL: I remember when John and I were first hanging out together, I had a dream about digging in the garden with my hands. Iād dreamt that before but Iād never found anything other than an old tin can. But in this dream I found a gold coin. I kept digging and I found another. And another. The next day I told John about this amazing dream Iād had and he said, āThatās funny, I had the same dreamā. So both of us had this dream of finding this treasure. And I suppose you could say it came true. I remember years later talking about it ā āRemember that dream we had?ā; āYeah, that was far outā. So the message of that dream was: keep digging lads.
PAUL MCCARTNEY TO THE BIG ISSUE. FEBRUARY 2012.