Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality
Anya is LIVE right now
FREE
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Shout! The Beatles in their Generation by Philip Norman was published in 1981 after several years' research, and was one of the first comprehensive biographies of the Beatles as a band after Hunter Davies' 1968 biography. It's a book often talked-about, but less often read, so I decided to read it and see if its problems really are as glaring as people say.
Norman's John biography from 2007 was a surprise for me, being better and not as fawning as I expected, so I reckoned I should give him the benefit of the doubt with this book. For reference: Shout! (such an odd title, btw) is widely discussed as being hostile to Paul and George, dismissing Ringo and hero-worshipping John, as well as getting lots of facts wrong. Is this true?
Like every Beatles book, Shout! relies a lot on Hunter Davies' 1968 biography, as that contained many interviews with the bands' families and friends. Norman didn't have as good access as Davies did, so uses the earlier interviews from Davies and then his own interviews with people in the orbit (but not the inner circle) to flesh out his story. (Interesting point: Norman's research assistant was none other than a young Mark Lewisohn, who is name-checked affectionately a couple of times in the book. There doesn't seem to be much love lost between them this days, which raises the tantalising possibility of a Lennon-McCartney-style falling-out between these former collaborators!)
I'll comment on the 2001 foreword and the 2005-ish afterword later and stick with the main body text for now. The first section of the book, leading up to around 1962, is relatively calm. The progression of events and anecdotes cited is actually quite similar to Tune In Vol. 1, which would make sense if Lewisohn was the primary researcher. Obviously there are many details that would be corrected and updated in Tune In, such as the circumstances of George Martin signing the band, but the overall arc of the story is much the same. Interestingly, like with the Norman John bio, I didn't detect as much John hero-worship as we get in Tune In. He's written about relatively normally - advocated as a Great Leader of course, but not as breathlessly and weirdly as in Tune In, and his dark side is depicted too. Paul doesn't get too much grief (relatively speaking) in this first part - he is depicted sometimes as vain, envious, bossy and manipulative, but it's not constant. If you read just this first section, you wouldn't necessarily come away with the impression that John was the hero and Paul just some loser scheming against him. George, on the other hand, is never treated fairly. Right from the start Norman has the knives out for him, referring to him as grumpy, boring, not especially talented, ungrateful, petty etc etc. Perhaps the only reason Shout! is not better known as an anti-George book is that he is mentioned so much less than Paul and John are, so there isn't the same volume of material about him. George and Ringo are very much afterthoughts in the Shout! narrative, with Ringo getting much less page time than George, and drastically less than JP.
Things change in the 1963-1967 period. This has some of the book's most glaring errors, mostly to do with music. Norman repeatedly attributes songs to the wrong composer or gets the details of who recorded what ass-backwards. To be fair to him, a lot of this information wasn't well-known until Lewisohn published his Recording Sessions book in 1988, and other books drawing on the Abbey Road archives also came out. But there are still some errors that even at the time must have stood out. Some of those errors could be forgiven if you got the feeling Norman actually cared about the music, but it doesn't really feel like he does, surprisingly. It misses a large chunk of the story.
(My favourite Musical Facepalm is Norman's assertion that John recorded "The Ballad of John and Yoko" entirely by himself. I got a very funny image of John doing a perfect vocal impression of Paul singing, recording himself singing the harmony line in that voice, and adding it to his main vocal on the recording. Clearly much simpler than just having Paul sing on it!)
As Norman has a new Brian book out, it's worth noting his portrayal of Brian in Shout! - short version: not good. His achievements are only begrudgingly acknowledged and he is portrayed as a horny simp for John, a temperamental hysteric (homophobic-coded much?) and a general hopeless case by the end. Norman introduced his "Brian was murdered by the Mob" story in the first edition of Shout!, then says in the 2001 edition that he's retracting it, but seems to be reviving it again for his new Brian book. Beware any reviews that refer to this as a "new" revelation!
John is credited with being the "avant-garde" Beatle in this middle section, which we know now isn't the full story (Not that he wasn't interested in art and current happenings, I don't like the counter-narrative, sometimes unfortunately encouraged by Paul, that John was just sitting on his backside doing nothing for the mid-60s). Paul's characterisation takes a bit of a nose-dive in this period, as Norman's obsession with his "social climbing" takes over. Did you know calling someone up to ask their opinion on a sofa you're thinking of buying is "minute social calculation"? Now you do!
Norman's a Paul/Jane stan, mostly because he believes Jane was tough enough to cut Paul down to size and deflate his ballooning ego. His breakup with her and taking up with Linda are seen as signs of his lack of character - leaving the intelligent, sensible woman who won't take his bullshit for the simpering idiot who'll forever tell him he's brilliant. His main source on Linda's apparent awfulness is...An Apple Scruff. Famously very non-biased and objective observers of that whole saga. I'm sure Norman was at least in part basing his narrative on the observations of contemporaries, so it's a framing that made sense to a lot of people, but like a lot of the narratives in the book, it's a tad simplistic.
JohnandYoko are broadly sympathetic, although Norman is fairly sniffy about their peace activism, which ties in with his general conservatism (more on that later). The breakup narrative is close-ish to that of Apple to the Core, with Klein and the Eastmans both being a bit villainous. I don't remember if it massively blames Paul for the breakup, so it probably doesn't, but gets in plenty of digs about his sneakiness etc etc on the way.
The post-Beatles life (up to 1981) of the four is done in a fairly shallow way. There's plenty of mean digs at Linda and Wings, the Lost Weekend is skated over with May barely mentioned, and George is portrayed as someone whose career and creativity simply collapsed without JP around. Ringo is, again, only vaguely mentioned, with repeated reminders that he "got lucky" and basically didn't have much talent. The book does end with a positive quote from Ringo about the love they shared, but it's not really in keeping with what preceded it.
Why was Shout! renowned for so long? Well, it deserves credit as the most serious post-Davies book about the band, and material from its quoted interviews is reused again and again, not least by Norman in his subsequent books. It did attempt to place the Beatles story in a generational context, a laudable effort undermined by Norman's intractable conservatism (his thesis could be summed up as "OK, it's great the Sixties happened and all, but in the long run it'd be better if it hadn't"). It's reasonably well-written, if a bit purple and clunky in parts. It's certainly not a slog to read. Before the late 1980s at least, it was probably the only moderately serious Beatles book on the mass market, so it was an important reference point for many, despite its failings. But in today's context there isn't much there that you couldn't get from more accurate (and sober) later books.
The foreword and afterwords: If you just read the text of Shout! itself, it'd leave a bad taste in your mouth, but you wouldn't necessarily come away thinking "this guy is deranged". That all changes when you read the foreword and afterword. The foreword, written for the 2001 reissue, is largely Norman's post 9/11 Thatcherite rant on the State of the World, a state that he seems to blame on the Beatles and all that peace and love jazz. It reminds me of a lot of journalists at that time, many of whom slightly lost their brains after 9/11, and reads as even more hysterical and bizarre with 25 years' hindsight.
The afterword talks about Norman's adventures in the Dakota with Yoko; and Paul's, George's and Ringo's post-Beatles careers in the 1980s and beyond. Norman is very proud of being invited to the Dakota by Yoko after Shout! came out and being shown all sorts of John-goodies. No doubt these visits laid the groundwork for the access he got to write the John bio - a cosy relationship that later broke down when Yoko decided his book was "mean to John" and tried to stop it coming out. See my Norman bio review for more on that!
In the post-Beatle Paul afterword, Norman manages to credit him with being a good father and husband - and that's it. Everything else is character assassination so over-the-top it's almost funny. This was written around 2005, too, so it's not like Norman was in the trenches of the early 1980s. Norman also cites a mean poem published about Paul in a magazine in the 1970s - without mentioning that the author of the poem was himself!! Honestly, this whole section is more like a psychological exploration of a Very Weird Guy, and not Paul lmao. It's not that post-Beatles Paul is beyond criticism - far from it - but the viciousness of this afterword is so far in the pit of bad faith it can't see the light.
The George afterword is equally shitty, but less vicious - Norman seems not to be able to muster up as much venom about George, much as he dislikes him. The first section is a prolonged extract from an interview with an Apple Scruff who allegedly slept with him in the early 70s, and goes into minute intimate detail. The purpose of this anecdote is unclear - it really seems like it's just there to humiliate George. Then Norman goes on to talk about how his career just went Nowhere without JP, and he became so Bitter and Mean (The possibility that George may have preferred to spend some time out of the limelight seems not to have occurred to ol' Phil). When I was at the play Please Please Me last month, Norman was part of the Q&A, and he told a story about when he first met the Beatles, he was bothered that George preferred to stay watching TV rather than talk to this random journalist. It seems Norman has held a bizarre grudge ever since :/
Ringo gets the usual Lucky Simpleton round-up, and then we're done. The afterwords are what would prompt me NOT to recommend the book to others - they are revealing, but not about the Beatles, but about the author himself. Of course, we know now that Norman has apparently had the scales fall from his eyes and written a sympathetic Paul biography, but somehow that makes him seem even worse - like he didn't even have the courage of his shitty convictions.
So my recommendation would be: not an essential read, but if you wanted to get an idea of where Beatles scholarship was at in the early 1980s, the main text would be worth a skim, but don't bother with the foreword and afterwords!
You're John Lennon and you're listening to ram for the first time. You're already pretty worked up because the album started with 3 diss tracks definitely aimed at you: "Too Many People", "3 Legs" and "Dear Boy". They left a strong impression on you but because it's the first time you're hearing them you have already half-forgotten what they sounded like except for some poignant lyrics. To say they left you feeling agitated is a euphemism.
Ram feels like a rollercoaster that just won't stop, it keeps leaving you disoriented with every new song, every unexpected turn Paul decides to take. It's an onslaught of information, sounds and lyrics and God damnit it sounds incredible (you're never going to admit that though. Except for maybe that song that went "hands across the water". You really liked that one. Is it because it sounded like Paul was imitating your voice/ songs?).
By the way, just why aren't the lyrics printed? It's as if Paul is forcing you to carefully listen to each word he's saying and because of this you're forced to absorb both the lyrics and the music at the same time without knowing what's coming next. It's infuriating, especially because you know there are secret messages sprinkled throughout the songs and it's already becoming clear that you're going to listen to this album again and again to pin down every single coded message Paul has expertly woven into this album.
This whole experience is making your hackles rise, because you've never been on the receiving end of Paul's cryptic songs quite like this. You've always been in the studio with him or in the same room while he was composing and, yeah, there had been McCartney but that was clearly Paul messing around and trying to get by, there wasn't a real effort to get under your skin, not like what he's doing with this new album. You're feeling like you're just another member of Paul's audience, a fan listening to his work for the first time and also like Paul's primary addressee at the same time, it's confusing and it's driving you mad.
You're halfway through the album. "Heart of the country" has just finished playing. A nice little tune that still managed to piss you off because you're still angry that Paul retired to freaking Scotland and then refused to see you for 6 months despite all the olive branches you extended, including one very poignant song (ahem, instant karma! The message was there even though it was a very angry and frustrated one "Come and join the human race" "why on earth are you there?").
It sounds like he's having fun up there. The amount of mixed feelings this thought brings is staggering. However, you don't have the time to dwell on them for too long because you're immediately slapped in the face by the honky-tonk piano and the jangling guitars of the next track: "monkberry moon delight". The tone clash of this song compared to the previous one leaves you reeling a little bit, you already knew that Paul was taking you in unexpected directions but the disorientation you feel is still quite significant. You haven't fully regained your wits when Paul starts attacking you with his potent, unhinged lead vocal.
So I sat in the attic, a piano up my nose
And the wind played a dreadful cantata (cantata, cantata)
Sore was I from a crack of an enemy's hose
And the horrible sound of tomato (tomato, tomato)
You're listening closely because you're forced to and you're immediately struck by the fact that Paul is leaning heavily into absurdism here. What do these lyrics mean? One thing you've learned from this album is that the more cryptic the lyrics get, the higher is the probability that they're aimed at you. You're going to pore over this song later, you already know it.
It sounds like Paul is having a bad time trying to create music in his attic. Are you the enemy that gave him pain? Possibly. Plastic Ono Band came out 6 months ago and you didn't pull any punches, especially with the song "God". You wanted it to hurt. You're still mad that Paul decided to drive you crazy with this album in return though.
Ketchup (ketchup)
Soup and puree (soup and puree)
Don't get left behind (get left behind)
Ketchup (ketchup)
Soup and puree (soup and puree)
Don't get left behind
(Don't get left behind, don't get left behind, don't get left behind)
You really wonder what he's saying here. Is it "catch up" or "ketchup"? He did mention a tomato earlier. You're unsure and you're angry because Paul didn't print the damn lyrics. "Don't get left behind" is it aimed at you? You're unsure. It could be Paul talking to himself, his worries taking over. You did make a solid debut as a solo artist with Plastic Ono Band and George had one too with All Things Must Pass. Paul's album was destroyed by the critics, it's probably only natural for him to obsess over not being left behind, trying to create something impressive to catch up with the other Beatles. You still itch to make the verse about yourself though.
When a rattle of rats had awoken
The sinews, the nerves and the veins
My piano was boldly outspoken
And attempts to repeat his refrain
"Rats" is he talking about you? No, alright, you need to calm down, you're already worked up and that isn't doing you any good. It's hard though because you're listening to ram, the new album by Paul McCartney, your ex-husband everywhere that counts except on paper (actually, maybe on there too: Lennon/McCartney); he's an insane genius of a musician and even though that is the reason why you fell for him in the first place, now the scope of his calculated anger and frustration is directed at you and analyzing the situation rationally requires a certain type of cool headedness that you have rarely possessed.
You take a deep breath while Paul carries on with his frankly impressive vocal performance. Maybe he's not attacking you here. It's more likely he's talking about the press. They've always been rats, always getting on your nerves and they've been particularly terrible to one specific singer-farmer recently. "Attempts to repeat his refrain" so Paul has realized that he needs to make a serious album. It pisses you off to admit this but that's exactly what he's been demonstrating with his latest creation so far. Ram is quite remarkable indeed. The word "attempt" catches your attention. It betrays a feeling of insecurity. To think that Paul could feel weak and insecure at this time seems laughable because you're feeling weak and insecure and when you feel that way Paul must surely feel strong. He did say it though. You don't dwell on these thoughts for long though because Paul has finished the verse and is already launching himself into the next one.
So I stood with a knot in my stomach
And I gazed at that terrible sight
He's creating tension. Every word is pronounced in a way that leaves you on the edge of your seat. What made Paul react this way? What is he gazing at?
Of two youngsters concealed in a barrel
Sucking monkberry moon delight
You let out a sharp breath. Your eyes snap wide open, your eyebrows climb up to your hairline. You stare at the record player but you're not actually looking at it. You're looking through it, trying to reach Paul because, what did he just say? Your gaze hardens, your eyebrows furrow, your lips form a straight taut line, your teeth clench.
You know exactly what he means with this line. You were right to feel wary when the song first started because this is just outrageous. These lyrics seem specifically designed to drive you insane.
The word "sucking", pronounced so clearly, gave it away immediately. Paul is talking about oral sex, and not just any oral sex he may have had in his life; he's talking about the one he had with you. "Two youngsters concealed in a barrel" two teenagers hiding and having their way with each other. "Concealed" because whatever they did, even if it were some innocent hand holding, had to be done in secret, hidden away. And Paul put it into a song. Shock and anger rush through you in equal amounts and the repeated "monkberry moon delight" that follow the verse don't help you calm down because they feel like taunts.
Maybe you jumped the gun with this interpretation but you're pretty sure you didn't. You know Paul and you know that he loves adding double meanings to his songs and if this is a song directed at you, which it very well might be considering everything that came before, then this is a double meaning only you will be able to catch. It's particularly maddening because if you're right you may want to talk to someone about what you uncovered but you'll be forced to stay silent because acknowledging this line and what it actually means is not something you can do. It would reveal everything you and Paul have worked so hard to conceal, all the sacrifices you made, even ruining the best thing that ever happened to you. No, you'll be forced to keep your mouth shut about it and go slightly insane while doing it.
The song is not even done.
Well, I know my banana is older than the rest
You're still fuming because of the previous lines when a startled laugh escapes you. "Banana" clearly calls a certain explicit image to the mind. It is true that Paul is getting older, that you're getting older.
And my hair is a tangled beretta (beretta, beretta)
And when I leave my pyjamas to Billy Budapest
And I don't get the gist of your letter (your letter, your letter)
This seals it. The song is directed at you. You and the angry letters you've been exchanging with Paul. Also "don't get the gist"? Of course he did, he's Paul, he knows you like no other. How could he not get it?
Catch up (catch up)
Cats and kittens (cats and kittens)
Don't get left behind (get left behind)
Catch up (catch up)
Cats and kittens (cats and kittens)
Don't get left behind
(Don't get left behind, don't get left behind, don't get left behind)
More of the same catch up, don't get left behind business. What's up with the cats and kittens? You frown but then you realize something. Maybe he wanted to make his daughters laugh. You still remember how Heather went on and on about kittens during the get back sessions, even though that seems so long ago now.
Monkberry moon delight (x20)
Is this what a descent into madness feels like? Now you're certain that he's talking about you, taunting you. He's reminding you of what you once had, what you once shared and it's frustrating you like nothing else could.
Paul really let himself go here, he's shrieking, wailing, he's all over the place and it all feels like a direct attack against you. You stare at your record player in complete outrage and yet still taken by his performance. You knew the man could scream but this is just crazy.
You feel jittery, Paul's vocals are making you want to get to your feet, jump, just do something with your body. So you do. You stand up and start to pace back and forth, just a couple of steps at a time before turning back around because you still can't stop staring at your record player, because Paul is insane. And as if the repeated "monkberry moon delight" wasn't enough he starts moaning. It makes you stop in your tracks and clench your teeth so hard you can feel a slight crack but you really don't care because what the hell? Is he serious? Is he actually simulating an orgasm? Your breathing comes out harsh and unsteady, heat is rushing through your veins and you're not sure whether it's entirely because of anger anymore.
The monkberry moon delight that comes after "what is it?" is too much, you tear your gaze away from your record player and pick up your pacing again only this time it takes up the entire room while profanities escape your lips. You know you look like a caged animal but you don't care because Paul just did that and it's too soon for your brain to form an adequate and calm response.
"Whoo" exhales Paul and you immediately turn around and glare at the record as if it were Paul himself. You shouldn't have because a new screamed "monkberry moon delight" hits you square in the chest and the squirming feeling makes its comeback.
The song ends and you're panting, rooted to the place and shaking slightly. You can't believe the nerve of the man.
The album is not done though and when you reach the end of the next track, "Eat At Home," you feel hysterical, because there's no way Paul is singing about Linda and "eating at home" right after he just screamed his head off on the same topic, only with regard to the opposite gender (you). But then again, of course he would.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality
Anya is LIVE right now
FREE
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
from Paris to Spain — the road of the stars toward the end of the end
In 1961, John and Paul set out on a hitchhiking trip with the intention of traveling to Spain through Paris. Though they never made it to their destination, that incomplete route holds its own significance.
There is another (far older) history associated with a journey from Paris to Spain — The Camino de Santiago, “the way of St. James.” One of the major pilgrimage roads to Santiago de Compostela begins in Paris, at the Tour Saint-Jacques — Saint James’s Tower — the remaining structure of the church of Saint-Jacques-de-la-Boucherie and the burial site of Nicholas Flamel. From there, the route crosses the Seine into the Left Bank, where Rue Saint-Jacques continues south through the Latin Quarter and out of the city, onto the old pilgrimage road toward Spain.
In alchemical legend, Nicholas Flamel walked The Camino de Santiago in search of someone who could interpret the figures in a mysterious manuscript he had acquired in Paris. The key to the text was ultimately revealed through the journey; along the road, Flamel gained the knowledge that would allow him to complete the Work himself. He became the very person he sought. The promise of the pilgrimage is compressed in that legend: traveling as a means of transformation. The self is changed through the act of making the journey.
Traditionally, the road to Santiago de Compostela is tied to the discovery of Saint James’s tomb under a miraculous star; Compostela is often read as Campus Stellae, or “field of stars” (though its etymology is debated, with compostum/burial place also given as a competing derivation.) Within this tradition, the camino is associated with the Milky Way — a heavenly road above corresponding to the pilgrim road below, on earth — giving rise to another name: The Road of the Stars.
Past Santiago, the journey continues west to Finisterre, from finis terrae: the “end of the earth.” The cape sits on Galicia’s Costa da Morte, the Coast of Death, considered in Classical Antiquity to be the end of the known world and the gates to the afterlife. Finisterre is also associated with the legendary Ara Solis, an ancient altar to the sun.
And so the road goes beyond the tomb and toward the place where the sun disappears into the Atlantic, the edge of the earth, the border between this world and whatever comes after it — toward The End of The End.
In a 2007 interview, when discussing the song, Paul was asked what he imagined to be “a much better place.” His answer — “a journey to Spain, through Paris” — inevitably recalls the trip that he and John set off on in 1961. But in classic McCartney fashion, its poignancy lies in its duality. Heaven is not some abstract elsewhere but both a memory of the past and an imagined future, the start of a journey along the Road of the Stars. As above, so below. The end and beginning at once.
Paul’s diary entry from Paris, 1961 — a view of the Saint-Jacques Tower from the left banks of the Seine — The End of the End, 2007 — Finisterre, “the end of the earth,” Costa da Morte — Paul McCartney Got Back Tour 2022, by Andre McGranahan — a performance of Here Today in Buenos Aires, 2024
“To be good, according to the vulgar standard of goodness, is obviously quite easy. It merely requires a certain amount of sordid terror, a certain lack of imaginative thought, and a certain low passion for middle-class respectability.”
Won't You Come Out to Play presents our first digital zine:
We had ten fabulous authors write some incredible essays for Pride Month, and now it is finally time to share it with everyone! Check out the article below to get to know the authors and their works and click here to access the zine!
Personal essays on fandom, identity, and self-discovery
From the four of us at WYCOTP, Happy Pride!! 🏳️🌈🏳️⚧️
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality
Anya is LIVE right now
FREE
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Happy St Patrick's Day! ☘️ Celebrate with Chapter One of my new Beatles fic, Pentimento, a novel-length story from the POV of Stuart Sutcliffe, who in this universe doesn't die in 1962 and has a front-row seat to the Great Gay Panic/John-Paul Breakdown of 1968 (for his sins).
A story about queer life in Swinging London, with characters you know well and some new ones, weaving in and out of each other's lives and relationships like some kind of enormous macramé shawl.
We open in February 1968. Stuart is a working artist living in London with Astrid, occasionally doing freelance work for his old friends the Beatles. Stuart and Astrid have an open marriage and each embark on passionate queer relationships, which bring them both joy but challenge their stability as a couple. Meanwhile, Stuart is worried about John and his seeming mental breakdown, and has very mixed feelings about John's way of dealing with this. These mixed feelings draw him closer to his old enemy Paul, who he has developed a better relationship with over the years, but who he still has trouble understanding.
Events contrive to draw Stuart deeper into the vortex of chaos caused by John and Paul's prolonged, painful breakup, while he simultaneously struggles to keep a handle on his increasingly complex personal life.
In this universe, John and Paul have been a covert, non-monogamous couple since about 1961, while Stuart and John had a relationship before then, ended by Stuart meeting Astrid. John also had an affair with Brian, whose tragic death looms large over the story.
Please note that, as well as the listed tags, there are additional tags of
very sensitive content
that I have put in a hidden menu in the story opening notes because they spoil significant elements of the plot. These tags can be viewed in the menu and I would recommend viewing them if you have any concerns, but just keep in mind that you will be spoiled!
I will note that this sensitive content is NOT graphic violence, rape, non-con or child abuse - this might be helpful if you know you don't want to read anything on those subjects, and also don't want to be spoiled.
This story will update twice a week, usually on Tuesdays and Saturdays (although it will be Tuesday and Friday this first week).
This is finished! What a journey 😅 The longest thing I've written by a long shot; I hope it works as a novel. Thanks so much to everyone for all the kudos, comments, asks, conversations and encouragement over the last few months 💖
I did a re-read and all I could see were typos and continuity errors 😭 but hopefully with more time I'll be able to appreciate it as a story. Now to dash to ao3 and fix the more egregious mistakes! #justwritingthings
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality
Anya is LIVE right now
FREE
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
"I look at early pictures of meself, and I was torn between being Marlon Brando and being the sensitive poet - the Oscar Wilde part of me with the velvet, feminine side. I was always torn between the two, mainly opting for the macho side, because if you showed the other side, you were dead." John lennon - The Last Rolling Stone Interview: By Jonathan Cott, Rolling Stone Magazine 1980