Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
â Live Streamingâ Interactive Chatâ Private Showsâ HD Qualityâ Free Actions
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
I've been on a real McCartney II kick recently and I'm just astonished by how much of a McLennon album it is? And, even more so, the fact that I haven't seen many people talking about it that way (save for @bodhbdearg, whose McLennonlens series is greatâgo check it out).
So anyway, I wanted to correct some wrongs and share my McLennon gospel with the masses. Without further ado, here's my semi-in depth analysis of this album through a McLennon Lens, if bodhbdearg will permit me to use the phrase!
"Coming Up"
This was a song John thought was personally directed at him, and it's not hard to see why. Even ignoring the reference to Paul's Beatle persona in the music video, it seems like a direct conversation with a certain someone, a personal message of hope and reconnectionâsomething easily on par with the likes of "(Just Like) Starting Over."
There are a lot of lyrics in this song that tip me off to it being about John, but nothing convinces me quite as well as the third and fourth verse:
You want some peace and understanding
So everybody can be free
I know that we can get together
We can make it, stick with me
[...]
You want a better kind of future
One that everyone can share
You're not alone, we all could use it
Stick around, we're nearly there
Like?? There is no doubt in my mind that this is about John and his political activism. All he was saying for this entire decade was to "give peace a chance," and in his only explicitly autobiographical work, "Two Virgins" (posthumously published in Skywriting By Word of Mouth), he emphasizes that the difference between him and others of his political leanings was that he could talk to people whereas his contemporaries refused to take part in any sort of dialogueâin other words, John had an "understanding" that his fellow activists simply lacked.
Now all of that might be a bit on the nose, but come on. "You want a better kind of future/One that everyone can share/You're not alone"? It's such an obvious callback to "Imagine," particularly the famous lines "You may say I'm a dreamer/But I'm not the only one." Paul's reinforcing that notion here, albeit nine years later, confirming to John that there are others out there who want to bring change just like himâthat Paul is one of them, too.
This makes his plea for the continuation of their friendship multi-faceted, showing that Paul respects John on both a personal, professional, and political level. It brings to mind the March for Our Lives protest Paul took part in back in 2018, largely spurred on by John's death from gun violence. Though obviously this came about under quite different circumstances, we can still see today how John's vision for a greater future lies at the heart of Paul's own political messaging, something he's slightly hinting at here. And there's also the professional angle as well: reportedly John and Paul had plans to get together and have a jam session during the new year (1981). They were on the precipice of musical as well as a personal reunion before it was all cut tragically short.
Which brings us back to the bigger picture: forget music, forget politics; this is also incredibly personal at its core. There's no hint of legislative worries or lyrical dilemmas when Paul entreats John to believe that he'll "help [him] with [his] problem" of not having "a love [that will] last forever," nor when he urges John to "stick around" for what he believes could be a friendship that "will never fade away" if they just work at it. It shows that no matter what, Paul wants them to still be in each other's corners, which is such a radical and welcome shift away from all the ex-Beatles' attitudes (save perhaps forgiving Ringo) following the dissolution of the band.
"Temporary Secretary"
OK, so this one is a bit of a stretch. Admittedly there's nothing in this song that could point to it being autobiographical, unless you want to take the narrator's semi-professional womanizing as some manifestation of Paul's "hunting of the female hordes." But in a way, that vaguely self-telling story which is otherwise complete gibberish feels like something right up John's alley.
The very first words of the song are "Mr. Marks," who's supposed to help Paul figure out the whole temporary secretary sitch. The name doesn't come from nowhere, as Paul later recalled it as being a nod to Alfred Marks of the Alfred Marks Bureau: "He had the same name as a comedian on the radio when I was growing up. So it was just the funny paradox of seeing adverts for the Alfred Marks Bureau, the idea of some comedian having a bureau was just funny." This is quite similar to John's use of satire and confusion/conflation in his nonsense books like In His Own Write and A Spaniard in the Works, both of which Paul read and loved, where he namedropped such notables as Princess Margaret ("Priceless Margarine") and Clyde Barrow ("Clive Burrow"). The names being just off what they're supposed to be is a hallmark of his work, whether it's for famous people or not (in one story of his, a housewife is referred to as having once been a "beauty queer"), and it is possible, though maybe a bit far-fetched, to think that John might have had some influence in this area.
And then there's just the premise of the song itself. Paul chose it precisely because it was zany, certainly within the realm of possibility but for all intents and purposes more farcical than realistic. This is precisely what John did in his works, too. He distorts reality just enough to make it seem fictitious while still being able to ground it in some sense of truth. So does Paul guide this hypothetical scenario into slightly bonkers territory with his descriptions of his prospective secretary's possible past careers:
She can be a belly dancer
I don't need a true romancer
She can be a diplomat
But I don't need a girl like that
She can be a neurosurgeon
If she's doin' nothing urgent
After all, what's a diplomat or a neurosurgeon doing being a secretaryâand a temporary one at that? Maybe Paul is just predicting the future state of the job market. More likely, he's moving the ridiculous level up to 11, just as John would've done.
"On the Way"
Harking back to the album opener's sentiment of reconciliation, "On the Way" depicts the narrator's relationship with its intended audienceâor possibly Paul's relationship with Johnâduring its rougher periods, which Paul and John would've just been coming out of following a bad telephone argument over Apple Corps in the late 70s. Specifically, Paul discusses all the things he's said about this personâagain, possibly Johnâin public just to hurt them, even though he didn't mean half of what he said:
Though I said some things to hurt you
Well, it was only out of fear
Wouldn't want to see you crying
So I hope you don't mind the things I say
Considering they both started the decade sending blow after blow at one another through their music and in the press, this tracks with the trajectory of their relationship in the early 70s, something which was briefly patched during the Lost Weekend only to be completely destroyed again following the aforementioned business dispute.
However, this could also throw some of Paul's jabs at John into a new light. I'm sure he meant every word of what he said on "Too Many People," at least at the time, but in some ways maybe it was also an attempt to scare John straight, over-exaggerating the severity of the things Paul disagreed with as a way to wake John up. "Don't let them tell you what you wanna be" could have just as well been aimed at the people John was preaching to as well as to John himself, imploring him to get out from underneath Yoko's thumb; in the next line, he accuses John of "holding back/This is crazy, and baby, it's not like me," just like how it's never been like John to be dominated so thoroughly by someone else beforeâsave, perhaps, Paul.
But we're getting off-track here. Back to 1980.
Well, you know I'll always love you
But it would have been a lie
If I said that I could please you
Every moment that I try
If there's one word that's been used over and over again to describe John's personality, it's mercurial. He was infamously wishy washy, feeling something one moment before completely pivoting the next. One can only imagine how difficult this made navigating a personal relationship with the man, and being seen as the only person who could "get" to John, Paul's role as his pacifier for many years must have only added to this strain.
Paul would've been exposed to this side of John countless times during their long, personal history as they grew from boys to men, leaving the country for the very first time together only to see the world at one another's sides. "Well, we've been traveling for a long time," Paul sings, "and we finally finished here"âa reference both to the state of their relationship since their first meeting at the Woolton Fete, somewhat Ă la "Two of Us" and its "road that stretches out ahead;" and the fact that they were separated by a body of ocean, two boys who once constantly spent their nights "top to tail" now living on opposite sides of the pond. In recalling the days of their youthful intimacy, Paul isn't sugarcoating thingsâhe mentions the good times just as much as the badâbut he's also trying to use it as emotional leverage to bring back some of their closeness, even if it's just in an emotional and not a physical sense. The plea he started in "Coming Up" returns full-force.
"Waterfalls"
John might have previously slammed Paul's solo output as being nothing more than "granny music" (which thank god he did, because that gave us the masterpiece that is "Silly Love Songs"), but Paul is not ashamed of that fact in the slightest. Indeed, he centers his romanticism as being one of the most important parts of his life on the next song, "Waterfalls," almost like he's daring John to disagree with him:
And I need love
Yeah, I need love
Like a second needs an hour
Like a raindrop needs a shower
Yeah, I need love
Every minute of the day
It's a powerful statement of vulnerability, one that's in direct contrast with John's unsentimental façade, and almost like he fears he might be driving John away with it, Paul quickly brings him back into the loop again by adding: "And it wouldn't be the same/If you ever should decide to go away." Paul might have all this love inside of him, and he might give it to many peopleâincluding his wife and childrenâbut nothing, Paul says, will ever be the same as his relationship with John. It's an eery and somewhat foreboding admission in the wake of subsequent events.
And we can tell this is more likely to be about John than any other object of his affection because, much like the track before it, there's a marked distance between the narrator and his intended audience. He's not there to keep his lover out of trouble, so he has to advise them remotely not to go "jumping waterfalls" and to "please keep to the lake" instead. Meanwhile he has Linda and the kids right beside him at all times; this kind of warning shouldn't be necessary through song. (Which is precisely what Paul claims the song is in Lyrics. I can definitely understand that angle for the versesâI can imagine the kiddos particularly digging the one about polar bearsâbut the chorus plods into such mature, vulnerable territory that it doesnât seem aimed at his kids at all, opening the possibility of there being multipleâand decidedly un-infantileâinspirations.)
This song finds Paul at his most unconfident, his most unassured, reminding the listener that while things were on the mend for him and John during this period, it was nowhere near perfect between them, though it might have been had they been given more time. As it stands, this was what the state of things was at the time of Paul putting out this album, with "Coming Up" being less reality and more hopeful fantasyâand it remains the state of things between Paul and John to this day.
"Nobody Knows"
We pick up the paceâand the moodâon the next track where Paul marvels at the fact that he's been able to hide some large secret for so long. Hmmm, I wonder what that secret might be...
For the most part, this song is pretty self-explanatory, though the fact that keeping things a secret is just "the way [Paul] like[s] it" is certainly something. Coming off of The Boys of Dungeon Lane, where Paul has been incredibly evasive about the lyrical inspiration behind the track "We Two"âone countless fans and reviewers have realized is most likely about Johnâwe can still find Paul being incredibly reticent about discussing his relationship with his closest friend, often recycling the same safe anecdotes to the media rather than really interrogating their dynamic. That's certainly his prerogative, but it's interesting to see him outline it so starkly on this track, almost teasing the viewer as if to say I have secrets but I won't tell you what they areâwhich, hey, more power to him.
What might be the most telling part of the song, for me, is its final verse, which speaks less to the Lennon-McCartney relationship as a whole as it does its state during the strained decade which they'd just left behind:
Baby, nobody knows
And that includes you, honey (nobody knows)
I'll pay your rent
I'll do you right (nobody knows)
Most every night
But still there's nobody knows
Not only is there a lack of understanding between Paul and the public hereâpresumably in that he and John have been making amends, whereas the press still peddles this antagonistic narrativeâbut also between Paul and John as well. This certainly makes sense, as following John's death Paul had to seek constant validation from friends and associatesâincluding Yokoâto be certain that he and John had ever even been friendly with each other. It's not unlikely to think that such doubt existed before John's passing, such as when Paul went to visit him at the Dakota and was brusquely turned away.
I'm going to skip the instrumentals (and the very short "Summer's Day Song") because I'm not nearly music-savvy enough to make any comments on them, except to regurgitate bodhdearg's fantastic assertion that the title "Front Parlour" is a reference to Paul and John's songwriting days on Forthlin Road, and head straight into the next verbal track, which is the bizarre and enchanting
"Bogey Music"
Similarly to "On the Way," we're blasted back to the past on this track where Paul does his best attempt at the famous Elvis warble. Its weird vocal distortions and echo add a decidedly techno and experimental flavor to what would've otherwise been a rather nostalgic song, which almost baits John into a sense of security through its evocation of the rock 'n' roll craze that brought them together back in 1957:
Bogey music, bogey music
Well, when the younger bogeys
Hear that bogey sound
Every little bogey
Got to bogey down
It also might allude to the early days of the Beatles immediately after being signed with Brian Epstein. In particular, it seems to mention the earliest point of contention between Paul and John during the band's professional stage: whether or not they should clean their act up.
All you little bogeys
I want you to sing along
Clean your bogey act up
And learn the bogey song
Ultimately, Paul rallied behind Brian, John capitulated, and the rest is history.
But, just like on "Waterfalls," Paul takes this potentially alienating recollection and quickly steers into more reassuring territory:
Without bogey music
Life is incomplete
You know, it is... suckers
If there's one thing John and Paul have made blatant throughout the yearsâif there's one thing Paul is making blatant through this albumâit's that to one another, they represent rock 'n' roll. They each came to appreciate the genre independently, but ever since that day 69 years ago the two ideasâa life in music, or just music in general; and Lennon-McCartneyâhave forever been intertwined, both in the men's minds and in public consciousness. If Paul says life is "incomplete... without bogey music," then he's essentially saying that life is incomplete without John. Which the future would prove to be the case.
"Darkroom"
At first glance, it appears that this is just about the dim conditions used for developing photographsâsomething Paul himself would've been very familiar with, having a photographer for a wife. However, from the opening line we're plunged into a world of mystery and secrecy, one that feels decidedly illicit and sexy if only for the song's arrangement, which doesn't have anything to do with photography whatsoever.
Got a place
We can go
Lights are low
Let me show you to my darkroom
If there's one thing a darkroom isn't, it's a place to hang out. What with the somewhat exacting conditions needed for photos to develop, you'd be better off spending your time elsewhere. And with all those negatives you need to carefully avoid, doing the sorts of activities that often follow "low[ering]" the "lights" would probably be tedious. Which knocks a literal darkroom out of the equation. So where could the narratorâor Paulâbe meeting his lover? A hotel, perhaps?
This might sound like a stretch given that a dimly-lit place that's not an actual darkroom could be just about anything, but remember, this might not be just any song we're talking about. These songs are responses as much as they're declarations of outright feeling; there's some precedent that's been set up by the songs that come before it. Luckily for us, an early demo of "(Just Like) Starting Over" might point us in the direction of this room's identity:
Why donât we⌠do it in the road?! (Laughs)
A little hotel where we used to screw
A little place down in Montauk
Now I'm not saying Paul had access to this particular demo of "Starting Over." On the contrary, this seems highly unlikely and he probably heard the song for the first time with the rest of us. But if we take "Starting Over" as being autobiographical on John's part, and it being about Paulâwhich not only seems likely given these and other lyrics, but also has been hinted at by May Pangâthen we can assume that John and Paul spent time together in hotel rooms "screw[ing]," as John put it, during the last decade. And if John can draw from those memories in "Starting Over," even if it didn't make the final cut, then Paul certainly can on "Darkroom" as well.
For more info on the hotel story, I highly suggest you check out the linked post by @i-am-the-oyster!
"One of These Days"
Now we come to the end of our album, and boy, have we had quite the journey. From promises of a better future and rehashing their past disputes, to mentioning the past as far away as their Quarrymen days and as recent as their frequent (at least sexual) reunions in Montauk during the 70s, McCartney II is somewhat unprecedented in encompassing the full breadth of the McLennon relationshipâand all before either of them knew it was shortly going to end.
It's only fitting to bring us back full circle to these aspirations for the future which, after all this reminiscing, are now remarkably more sober and levelheaded, lacking the punch of "Coming Up" but none of its wistfulness. In particular, Paul sings
One of these days
When we both are at our ease
When you've got time to please yourself
See what's right and see what's there
And breathe fresh air, ever after
It's there, it's round
It's to be found
By you, by me
It's all we ever wanted to see
There's no immediacy in it; none of the urgency of "Coming Up." But that's because Paul doesn't need it anymore. After everything he and John have been throughâafter everything he's remembered over the course of this albumâPaul realizes that, to borrow words off The Boys of Dungeon Lane (and one of the songs that isn't even about John, anyway), "they're going to make it through; they're going to make it alright."
And what's his reasoning for believing that? Because they're Paul and John, for crying out loud. Because they're John and Paul. Because they're Lennon-McCartney, or McCartney-Lennon. It's what they've done before, and it's what they'll continue doing until the very end.
Of course, neither of them realized that the end was quite near. McCartney II, released on 16 May 1980, came only 206 days before John's brutal assassination on 8 December in front of his New York City home. But during that time, it managed to invigorate Johnâand, more than that, it really touched him. When John first heard "Coming Up" on the radio, he yelled, "Fuck a pig! That's Paul!" He called the song "a good piece of work," and it even inspired him to get back into the studio and write more songs again. Just as "Bogey Music" spells out, Paul is music for John, and John will always be music for Paulâand without bogey music, life is incomplete.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
â Live Streamingâ Interactive Chatâ Private Showsâ HD Qualityâ Free Actions
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
A while back, I made a series of posts about the archival history of the (in)famous early demos by John of what was then "Real Life" and eventually became the songs "I'm Stepping Out" and "Real Love." I didn't say much at the time about what/who these demos might be addressing, because I wanted to get the recording history straight in my head before getting into speculation.
I've thought a lot about these demos since then. Many people in the fandom are certain they are addressing Paul, others are certain they're not, others are agnostic. Today I'm asking that question myself, looking at the demos' history, lyrical themes, and my own sense based on immersion in JP's music.
A quick summary of the historical background:
The piece of audio called the "Real Life demo" that you'll find cycling around Tumblr and YouTube is usually presented as one demo recorded by John on one occasion. However, it is actually several fragments of the same basic musical/lyrical idea, recorded at several (undated) points between the late 70s and 1980.
The fragment with the "and now a baby and another on the way, la la la la farm" lyrics is usually dated to summer 1980 (either before or after Bermuda) but that dating, like all the dating of the fragments, is not 100% certain.
Here on Tumblr, the entire piece of audio is often cited as being from 1977. This is based on an old post which matched the semi-improvised lyrics with a newspaper story from February 1977 about Paul and Linda announcing their pregnancy. There may be something to that, but it's important to note that that post was going on the assumption that the audio of all the fragments represented one recording session on one date, which isn't the case.
So it's not certain at all that any part of the recording can be dated to 1977 based on newspaper reports - but it's not NOT certain either. Like with all these things, it's good to keep an open mind. In the absence of more concrete information, I usually date the fragments to "late 1970s-1980".
As a reminder, these are the lyrics that are speculated to be about/addressed to Paul:
Was I just dreamin', or was it only yesterday
I used to hold you in my arms
And now the baby, and another on the way [laugh]
Ba la la la la farm [laugh]
And, from another fragment:
If it don't feel right, don't do it
If it don't look right, look right through it
If it don't feel right, don't do it
Just call [him/'em] on the phone.
These come from the "last" demo fragments ("Last" in quotes because it's not known if the order these fragments were played on the Lost Lennon Tapes radio show is the order in which they were recorded, although the LLT does specifically date this fragment to summer 1980, fwiw. If you want to read a deep dive into how these demos are dated, go here)
Much metaphorical ink has been spilled on the meaning of these (seemingly) improvised lyrics. Is the reference to a baby and a farm talking about the February 1977 news story about Paul and Linda? Is it talking about Yoko supposedly trying to get pregnant in early 1980, and the farm the Lennons bought in upstate New York? Is it referring to May Pang? Is it just meaningless filler words?
Cases can be made for all of the above, and many more besides, I'm sure. I don't strongly believe or disbelieve any of them. The process of songwriting (like all creative work) is so diffuse and tricky to pin down that an artist would probably be hard pressed themselves to identify the sources of their inspiration.
So, for me, the baby-farm lyrics aren't conclusive proof of anything, and could be interpreted many ways. That goes for all the lyrical fragments. But I still do believe that some part of this lyrical-musical working-out is addressing and/or thinking about Paul.
My reasoning for this is in no way scientific and doesn't count as "proof" in any traditional sense. However it does align strongly with the intuitive sense I get from JP's songwriting, where certain lyrical and musical themes recur and seem to be expressing "the secret code" of 'Days We Left Behind'. This is by its very nature unprovable, residing in the realm of artistic/emotional truth rather than facts and figures.
The case for my belief rests on just one word from the fragments' lyrics:
Was I just dreaming, or was it only
Yesterday
The song "Yesterday" undoubtedly held significance for JP, both positive and negative. Here's a good post summarising the history. Lots of people have noticed John's use of the word in songs that are, or may be, addressing Paul. The most obvious one, in that we know it's addressed to Paul, is "How Do You Sleep", from the 1971 album Imagine.
The only thing you done was Yesterday
And since you're gone you're just another day
A less-frequently observed unhappy Yesterday reference occurs on the album before, in the song "God":
The dream is over
What can I say?
The dream is over
Yesterday
Paul's (possible) response to the above was the song "Tomorrow" from 1971's Wild Life. Yesterday is over, time for Tomorrow...
John later included the word in "I Know (I Know)", a song written in 1972 and released on the 1973 album Mind Games. The song contains clear musical and lyrical references to the Beatles in general and Paul in particular:
Today, I love you more than yesterday
Right now, I love you more right now
As the word was used to communicate with Paul negatively, now it's possibly being used to communicate with him positively.
It's also perfectly possible that "yesterday" in the "Real Life" fragment is just a coincidence and doesn't mean the lyric has anything to do with Paul. On the surface, it's being used as a shorthand to mean "the past" as presumably the person John is addressing wasn't in his arms literally the previous day. So it can be easily "explained away", and if some piece of information came to light that proved the demos were about someone/thing other than Paul, I won't mind.
But in the absence of such evidence so far, I still "believe in Yesterday", because it makes the most sense to me from an artistic and emotional truth point of view.
is there any reason to think that "Dig a Pony" isn't about Paul? every reference in it seems to point at least tangentially to him. but perhaps i'm too mclennon-brained, or i'm misunderstanding something. (the mainstream analysis seems to be more like it's mocking the Rolling Stones or about drugs, or 'just nonsense.' I find it difficult to believe the 'just nonsense' angle.)
Hi there! First of all, it's important to remember that "mainstream" assertions of what a song is about are usually just as speculative as anything we come up with in mclennonland. The only person who can know what a song is really about is the songwriter, and unless they say what it's about, everything else is speculation. (And even then, songwriters are not necessarily honest about inspiration - looking at you, Paul). Speculation isn't necessarily wrong and can be informed by contextual information, but it can't be definitive.
The only thing John said about 'Dig a Pony' was that it was a "nonsense" song that didn't mean anything, which could certainly be true, but I think he sometimes hid behind the "nonsense" label when he didn't want to get into songs' meanings (I speculate about that tendency in my "Hey Bulldog" analysis). The mainstream theories that it references drugs, or Jagger/The Stones, could have something to them, but it's no more certain than a Paul interpretation.
The chorus "All I want is you / Everything has got to be just like you want it to" sounds like it could be addressing Paul. For that reason, it also could plausibly be addressing Yoko - John sure did have a type! Although the tone of the address sounds more like it's addressing someone who's not currently "with" the singer. YMMV.
The line "You can imitate everyone you know" sounds more like Paul, with his demonstrated ability to do impressions. And "you can penetrate anyplace you go" is, ehh, suggestive. But because these lyrics are so mysterious, someone could easily parse them as being about someone or something else.
My suspicion is that the seemingly "nonsense" lyrics actually made sense to at least one other person, and that person could be Paul. At the same time, I'm not particularly wedded to the theory as I recognise that it's impossible to know for sure. So I can't definitively answer what it's about, but more importantly, neither can the "mainstream" interpreters. We're all just vibing out here :)
We have a special treat for you all! Instead of our usual articles, for the next two weeks we will share our thoughts on Paul's new album The Boys of Dungeon Lane. This week, we discuss Side A. What do winding journeys along the road, operas, phallic fungi, and the passage of time all have in common? Find out in our review!
Sorry, could you share the letter that Brian sent Nat after his father died? Iâve never read that! (So I can understand why thereâs a good chance he was having lot of sex) THANKSđŤśđť
Here! (Also got another ask about this too btwđ). Yeah so. To quote Brian "I'm real hot for sex." After only 8 days without. I believe I got this out of Debbie Geller's book but found this in January so idk for sure.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
â Live Streamingâ Interactive Chatâ Private Showsâ HD Qualityâ Free Actions
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
As You Lie There
I was an obsessive young man, and I'm an obsessive old man. If I fall for you I want you to obsess about me too.
Lost Horizon
We live in time we lose people and things that meant a lot to us. Knowing that ought to shape what we do.
Days We Left Behind
I'm feeling a lot better about a lot of things, but it's been a hard road getting here.
Ripples in a Pond
I can't quite give full vent in public (possibly also in private) to my insecurities but I'm really glad you're here Nancy.
Mountain Top
It can be really nice and fun to do mind altering drugs together.
Down South
What I had with George before I met John was real and important. I love you George.
We Two
I miss you John. Down South has me all in my feelings about poetry.
Come Inside
I've already said I'm not going to say the secrets out loud, and that you should listen to my music. Listen!
Never Know
I miss you John. I miss being your number one. And despite my previous protestations on this album I'm still never completely certain what I meant to you.
Home to Us
When I speak positively about Liverpool, it doesn't mean it wasn't hard. And when Ringo speaks negatively about Liverpool, it doesn't mean it wasn't his home.
Life Can Be Hard
Life can be hard. But I don't like to think about that. And honestly that approach has served me pretty well.
First Star of the Night
Linda's spirit watches over our family and gives me a lot of comfort. I'm sad she's gone.
Salesman Saint
The past weaves into the future. I forgive my Dad for some things I don't want to think about, but I can't think of anything I need to forgive my Mum for.
Momma Gets By
The similarities between my mother's death and Linda's death still disturb me. The shit they put up with is honestly pretty upsetting. But I know, in a way that can only be conveyed in music, what it is to love someone that way.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
â Live Streamingâ Interactive Chatâ Private Showsâ HD Qualityâ Free Actions
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
From Mark Lewisohn's Tune In:
"Was Woolton fete the first time John met Paul? A riddle in two paragraphs:
In certain private company, Paul sometimes reveals that he hadnât only seen John on buses before the Woolton fete, but theyâd also exchanged a few words. Paul says he was working as a paperboy (on his bike, delivering the Echo to local houses in the evenings) when he once talked to John outside the newsagentâs shop. John never mentioned it, and Paul has chosen, consistently for decades, never to say it publicly. He was a paperboy after the McCartneys relocated to Forthlin Road in summer 1956, when he turned 14. Paul is shy about giving away the shopâs identity to anyone whoâd print it, but one local family who knew him think it was âAbbas.â
From beatlesliverpoollocations.blogspot.com:
The unnamed family mentioned in Mark Lewisohnâs notes are the Hodgsons. In 1956 Charles (senior) and his wife Annie were living at 111 Stamfordham Drive, Allerton with their two sons, Reginald, 26 and Charles, 14. Peter Hodgson, Reginald's son, has told me how his Uncle Charlie got to know the 14 years old Paul McCartney when he was working as a paper boy.
Peter Hodgson: In or around 2010 I told Mark [Lewisohn] that (Paul had worked at) the shops at the Cenotaph, right by my Dadâs [...]  We now know that sometime in the past, Paul has revealed the actual first meeting between himself and John and where that meeting took place. I think someone close to Paul has let the cat out of the bag to Mark and (Lewisohn) has wanted to know the name and location of Abbas in 1956. At this time and in the subsequent years, the locals will still have referred to the shop as Abbas when mentioning it, hence it was still known as Abbas by my Dad and brother...many decades later. This is where the confusion started as to the shopâs location as Mark was relying on documentation only, whereas I was relying on first hand witnesses who actually lived literally yards away. I got it straight from Macca, face to face, he agreed and nodded when I mentioned Abbas so when I told Mark many years later he went searching and could only find an Abba in Aigburth. Whatâs interesting is that at some point Mark actually asked Paul the name of the newsagentâs he delivered for in Allerton. Paul refused to answer him. An unusual refusal for such a seemingly trivial question.
[Peter was pleased with what my own research had uncovered, for personal family reasons as much as for the benefit of Beatleâs history. (He said to me): You finding W.W. Abba at 85 Woolton Road vindicated me to Mark, as itâs impossible for me, my Dad or Uncle Charlie to have been making it up].
(Scene from the Fuh You music video. The location of the newsagent, W.W. Abba at Woolton Road, is on the left, which is shown as Paul sings, "on the night that I met you...". The Liverpool local who found the newsagent did his research much earlier than the release of this video. He was shocked when he saw it.)
The thing that interests me most about this account is what is reveals about ML's working methods, which seems to prioritise documentary sources over oral accounts. This is a perfectly reasonable approach that most historians would take, as oral recollections can be confusing and distorted by normal memory failure, agendas etc. But this account does seem to display a certain lack of imagination on his part. It would make sense, in a scenario such as this, to retain both the oral and the documentary evidence, even if they contradict each other, and present them in the text, acknowledging the contradiction and letting the reader decide what seems most likely. That way, any further supporting evidence for either position that may arise will already have all the relevant information to build on. It may seem like a trivial point but he did many oral interviews with others and used it to inform his research, so it would've made sense to do the same here, even if it was just a quick conversation.