Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality✓ Free Actions
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
August 22nd, 1972 (Fillmore East, New York): During the rehearsals for the One-to-One charity concert, John (with Elephant’s Memory) finds his way through a muddled jam of The Righteous Brothers’ ‘Unchained Melody’ which slips into Conway Twitty’s ‘It’s Only Make Believe’. (Note: See also.)
JOHN: My love, my darling / I hunger for your crutch / So slowly / My darling / When I hold you in my arms / Oh babe…
People see us everywhere / They think you really care / But myself I can’t deceive / I know it’s only make-believe / Yeah yeah yeah… / My one and only prayer / Is that someday you’ll care / My hopes my dreams come true / My one and only you / No one will ever know / How much I love you so / But it’s only make-believe…
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality✓ Free Actions
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
recently read Glyn John’s book Sound Man and i’m posting all the interesting excerpts about the beatles here before I return the book to the library!
“The only slightly strange thing to me was that instead of politely melting into the background as they started to work, Yoko remained sitting on the same chair as John, sometimes answering for him when he was addressed by one of the others. He seemed quite happy with this, so everyone realizing that this was to be the way of things, proceeded as best they could. I had never witnessed anything quite like it and felt very uncomfortable, so heaven knows how the others felt. It was almost like having a fifth member in the band all of a sudden.
After they had finally run through the first song a couple of times, Paul turned to me and asked what I thought they should do for an intro. I nearly fell over in shock. I thought I had been employed to just engineer and here I am in the first hour of rehearsals being asked for my input into the arrangement. I responded as quickly and confidently as I could and suggested a way of playing the intro, which they liked, and we were off. I was amazed at how quickly and easily I was accepted, each guy individually making an attempt to put me at ease and make me feel part of the team. It was only then that I realized that George Martin was not to be involved. I assumed that was because it was a live recording and did not require the normal studio production associated with their records.”
pg 123
“Whenever we took a break we would continue to discuss the how, where, and why of the show. Paul had the idea to take a cruise ship full of Beatles fans to an ancient open-air amphitheater somewhere in Tunisia and put the show on there. This did not go down terribly well with the others, particularly Ringo, whose main concern seemed to be what the food would be like.
On the second day, things came to a head among the band. The entire crew left the room in great haste to allow them some privacy to sort out their differences.
I have often thought that being in a band can be likened to being in a marriage. Members spend their lives cooped up with one another for weeks on end, sharing some very strange and sometimes extremely boring times together, magnifying the differences between the personalities that are bound to exist between any group of humans, that have nothing to do with the creative mix that they share as a unit.
Equally, there invariably comes a time when one or another in a band becomes frustrated with the status quo and wants to take a different musical path and set sail on his own.
I have a very clear memory of sitting outside in the bleak surroundings of the soundstage at Twickenham on that cold gray afternoon with Denis, the line producer for the film, both of us praying that the elation of being employed for a project with the most successful artist in the world was not about to come to a grinding halt after only two days.
It is not my place to discuss any detail of what happened, but it is common knowledge that George left the band and was persuaded to return a couple of days later.”
pg. 124
“The band had formed Apple Electronics in 1967, for the purpose of designing and building innovative consumer electronics. It was headed up by Yanni Alexis Mardas, whom Lennon had nicknamed Magic Alex and I knew as Alex the Greek. I had come across this guy before with the Stones on their 1967 tour of Europe. He turned up at a gig and sold Mick on the idea of building a light show for use on the tour, the likes of which had never been seen. Having been paid for the components, he reappeared a couple of weeks later with what could only be described as very basic disco lighting. Each guitar amp onstage had small lamps attached to it that would change color and intensity with the level and frequeney of the sound it emitted. I came to the conclusion that at best he suffered from delusions and at worst he was a complete fraud. He sure could talk the talk, and a couple-“
pg. 126
“years earlier had convinced The Beatles that he was an electronics genius. In fact, according to his ex-flatmate, Marianne Faithfull's first husband and art gallery owner John Dunbar, he was nothing more than a TV repairman.
Brian Jones had met Alex shortly after he arrived in England from Greece in 1965 and introduced him to John Lennon who had been impressed with his "Nothing Box," on display in Dunbar's gal-lery, which turned out to be exactly that, a small box with random blinking lights that John would supposedly sit and stare at while under the influence of LSD. It was at John Dunbar's gallery that he met Yoko, as she was also an exhibitor there.
Alex took me out to dinner in London a few weeks after the Stones tour had finished, to pitch me his ideas. Among many claims that he made to me that evening was that he reckoned he could build a domestic robot that would clean the house and answer the door, knowing who was friend or foe. He had convinced George that he could build the most innovative studio yet, claiming he could design and build a 72-track tape machine. At this point in time we were only up to eight tracks. The only product that I can recall to surface from Apple Electronics was a transistor radio that looked like an apple.
I turned up at Savile Row dreading what I was going to find there.
Particularly as it was going to be down to me to make it work. My fears were not unfounded. It was apparent that Alex knew little or nothing about the recording process. The console looked like something out of a 1930s Buck Rogers science fiction movie. Above it on the wall were eight loudspeakers that were about the size and thickness of a large ham and cheese sandwich. I had previously hinted to George that I had little or no faith in Alex and was put very sharply in my place.”
pg 127
“So when I all but burst into laughter at what I was confronted with as I walked into the control room, he accused me of being biased, having made up my mind before even trying it out. In any event, it soon became obvious to all concerned, and much to George's chagrin, that they had been ripped off and that the whole setup was as much of a joke as I had originally assumed it would be.
George Martin came to the rescue and arranged for us to borrow equipment from Abbey Road, which was delivered and installed by the wonderful Dave Harries[…]
We carried on in much the same manner as we had started. I set the band up in the round with a small PA and they continued to rehearse the songs, playing and singing live. […] After a couple of days, Billy Preston swung by to say hi and was immediately told to sit down at the electric piano and join in. What a bonus that turned out to be. He was an old pal of the band from their days at the Star-Club in Hamburg and they were all really pleased to see him. Apart from his genius as a musician he was great to have around and definitely contributed to the ever-improving mood of the sessions.”
pg 128
“I was having dinner with Klein in London one night in 1968 when he announced that he was going to get The Beatles. I told him he was bonkers, but here we were a year later, him waving hello to me with the grin of a Cheshire cat as John ushered him into the office for what may have been their first meeting.
After exactly a month, on the 3lst of January, we finished at Savile Row with a proper performance of all the songs as we had discussed and went our separate ways.”
pg 129
“When it came time to leave, I felt it would be hypocritical of me to go without mentioning the article in the press and John's extraordinary venom aimed at me over the Let It Be sessions. So, as we got to the front door to leave, I turned and, in as pleasant a way possible, asked him if he could explain himself, since he had appeared to be so pleased to see me and yet had been extraordinarily unpleasant in the interview.
He turned to me and told me that he had been equally vicious about Paul during the same period and that Paul had got it right when he had declared that the only person John was hurting with his vitriolic behavior was himself. It was not exactly an apology, more like an explanation. This outpouring of negativity had taken place during John's "primal scream" period in Los Angeles, when apparently he came off the rails for a while. We parted company with a hug and a look of relief from Mick that I had not embarrassed him, having gone against my word to behave myself.
That was to be the last time I saw him. I am really glad that my last memory of John is such a pleasant one.”
pg 216
a little bonus section i liked :)
“Many people over the years have asked me what drug I was on when constructing the opening sequence. This only goes to show what an extraordinary misguided idea so many people have with regard to the effects of drugs on popular music, as most find it incomprehensible to believe that I was completely straight and in fact have never taken drugs of any sort. Other than the odd aspirin.”
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality✓ Free Actions
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
I've been on a real McCartney II kick recently and I'm just astonished by how much of a McLennon album it is? And, even more so, the fact that I haven't seen many people talking about it that way (save for @bodhbdearg, whose McLennonlens series is great—go check it out).
So anyway, I wanted to correct some wrongs and share my McLennon gospel with the masses. Without further ado, here's my semi-in depth analysis of this album through a McLennon Lens, if bodhbdearg will permit me to use the phrase!
"Coming Up"
This was a song John thought was personally directed at him, and it's not hard to see why. Even ignoring the reference to Paul's Beatle persona in the music video, it seems like a direct conversation with a certain someone, a personal message of hope and reconnection—something easily on par with the likes of "(Just Like) Starting Over."
There are a lot of lyrics in this song that tip me off to it being about John, but nothing convinces me quite as well as the third and fourth verse:
You want some peace and understanding
So everybody can be free
I know that we can get together
We can make it, stick with me
[...]
You want a better kind of future
One that everyone can share
You're not alone, we all could use it
Stick around, we're nearly there
Like?? There is no doubt in my mind that this is about John and his political activism. All he was saying for this entire decade was to "give peace a chance," and in his only explicitly autobiographical work, "Two Virgins" (posthumously published in Skywriting By Word of Mouth), he emphasizes that the difference between him and others of his political leanings was that he could talk to people whereas his contemporaries refused to take part in any sort of dialogue—in other words, John had an "understanding" that his fellow activists simply lacked.
Now all of that might be a bit on the nose, but come on. "You want a better kind of future/One that everyone can share/You're not alone"? It's such an obvious callback to "Imagine," particularly the famous lines "You may say I'm a dreamer/But I'm not the only one." Paul's reinforcing that notion here, albeit nine years later, confirming to John that there are others out there who want to bring change just like him—that Paul is one of them, too.
This makes his plea for the continuation of their friendship multi-faceted, showing that Paul respects John on both a personal, professional, and political level. It brings to mind the March for Our Lives protest Paul took part in back in 2018, largely spurred on by John's death from gun violence. Though obviously this came about under quite different circumstances, we can still see today how John's vision for a greater future lies at the heart of Paul's own political messaging, something he's slightly hinting at here. And there's also the professional angle as well: reportedly John and Paul had plans to get together and have a jam session during the new year (1981). They were on the precipice of musical as well as a personal reunion before it was all cut tragically short.
Which brings us back to the bigger picture: forget music, forget politics; this is also incredibly personal at its core. There's no hint of legislative worries or lyrical dilemmas when Paul entreats John to believe that he'll "help [him] with [his] problem" of not having "a love [that will] last forever," nor when he urges John to "stick around" for what he believes could be a friendship that "will never fade away" if they just work at it. It shows that no matter what, Paul wants them to still be in each other's corners, which is such a radical and welcome shift away from all the ex-Beatles' attitudes (save perhaps forgiving Ringo) following the dissolution of the band.
"Temporary Secretary"
OK, so this one is a bit of a stretch. Admittedly there's nothing in this song that could point to it being autobiographical, unless you want to take the narrator's semi-professional womanizing as some manifestation of Paul's "hunting of the female hordes." But in a way, that vaguely self-telling story which is otherwise complete gibberish feels like something right up John's alley.
The very first words of the song are "Mr. Marks," who's supposed to help Paul figure out the whole temporary secretary sitch. The name doesn't come from nowhere, as Paul later recalled it as being a nod to Alfred Marks of the Alfred Marks Bureau: "He had the same name as a comedian on the radio when I was growing up. So it was just the funny paradox of seeing adverts for the Alfred Marks Bureau, the idea of some comedian having a bureau was just funny." This is quite similar to John's use of satire and confusion/conflation in his nonsense books like In His Own Write and A Spaniard in the Works, both of which Paul read and loved, where he namedropped such notables as Princess Margaret ("Priceless Margarine") and Clyde Barrow ("Clive Burrow"). The names being just off what they're supposed to be is a hallmark of his work, whether it's for famous people or not (in one story of his, a housewife is referred to as having once been a "beauty queer"), and it is possible, though maybe a bit far-fetched, to think that John might have had some influence in this area.
And then there's just the premise of the song itself. Paul chose it precisely because it was zany, certainly within the realm of possibility but for all intents and purposes more farcical than realistic. This is precisely what John did in his works, too. He distorts reality just enough to make it seem fictitious while still being able to ground it in some sense of truth. So does Paul guide this hypothetical scenario into slightly bonkers territory with his descriptions of his prospective secretary's possible past careers:
She can be a belly dancer
I don't need a true romancer
She can be a diplomat
But I don't need a girl like that
She can be a neurosurgeon
If she's doin' nothing urgent
After all, what's a diplomat or a neurosurgeon doing being a secretary—and a temporary one at that? Maybe Paul is just predicting the future state of the job market. More likely, he's moving the ridiculous level up to 11, just as John would've done.
"On the Way"
Harking back to the album opener's sentiment of reconciliation, "On the Way" depicts the narrator's relationship with its intended audience—or possibly Paul's relationship with John—during its rougher periods, which Paul and John would've just been coming out of following a bad telephone argument over Apple Corps in the late 70s. Specifically, Paul discusses all the things he's said about this person—again, possibly John—in public just to hurt them, even though he didn't mean half of what he said:
Though I said some things to hurt you
Well, it was only out of fear
Wouldn't want to see you crying
So I hope you don't mind the things I say
Considering they both started the decade sending blow after blow at one another through their music and in the press, this tracks with the trajectory of their relationship in the early 70s, something which was briefly patched during the Lost Weekend only to be completely destroyed again following the aforementioned business dispute.
However, this could also throw some of Paul's jabs at John into a new light. I'm sure he meant every word of what he said on "Too Many People," at least at the time, but in some ways maybe it was also an attempt to scare John straight, over-exaggerating the severity of the things Paul disagreed with as a way to wake John up. "Don't let them tell you what you wanna be" could have just as well been aimed at the people John was preaching to as well as to John himself, imploring him to get out from underneath Yoko's thumb; in the next line, he accuses John of "holding back/This is crazy, and baby, it's not like me," just like how it's never been like John to be dominated so thoroughly by someone else before—save, perhaps, Paul.
But we're getting off-track here. Back to 1980.
Well, you know I'll always love you
But it would have been a lie
If I said that I could please you
Every moment that I try
If there's one word that's been used over and over again to describe John's personality, it's mercurial. He was infamously wishy washy, feeling something one moment before completely pivoting the next. One can only imagine how difficult this made navigating a personal relationship with the man, and being seen as the only person who could "get" to John, Paul's role as his pacifier for many years must have only added to this strain.
Paul would've been exposed to this side of John countless times during their long, personal history as they grew from boys to men, leaving the country for the very first time together only to see the world at one another's sides. "Well, we've been traveling for a long time," Paul sings, "and we finally finished here"—a reference both to the state of their relationship since their first meeting at the Woolton Fete, somewhat à la "Two of Us" and its "road that stretches out ahead;" and the fact that they were separated by a body of ocean, two boys who once constantly spent their nights "top to tail" now living on opposite sides of the pond. In recalling the days of their youthful intimacy, Paul isn't sugarcoating things—he mentions the good times just as much as the bad—but he's also trying to use it as emotional leverage to bring back some of their closeness, even if it's just in an emotional and not a physical sense. The plea he started in "Coming Up" returns full-force.
"Waterfalls"
John might have previously slammed Paul's solo output as being nothing more than "granny music" (which thank god he did, because that gave us the masterpiece that is "Silly Love Songs"), but Paul is not ashamed of that fact in the slightest. Indeed, he centers his romanticism as being one of the most important parts of his life on the next song, "Waterfalls," almost like he's daring John to disagree with him:
And I need love
Yeah, I need love
Like a second needs an hour
Like a raindrop needs a shower
Yeah, I need love
Every minute of the day
It's a powerful statement of vulnerability, one that's in direct contrast with John's unsentimental façade, and almost like he fears he might be driving John away with it, Paul quickly brings him back into the loop again by adding: "And it wouldn't be the same/If you ever should decide to go away." Paul might have all this love inside of him, and he might give it to many people—including his wife and children—but nothing, Paul says, will ever be the same as his relationship with John. It's an eery and somewhat foreboding admission in the wake of subsequent events.
And we can tell this is more likely to be about John than any other object of his affection because, much like the track before it, there's a marked distance between the narrator and his intended audience. He's not there to keep his lover out of trouble, so he has to advise them remotely not to go "jumping waterfalls" and to "please keep to the lake" instead. Meanwhile he has Linda and the kids right beside him at all times; this kind of warning shouldn't be necessary through song. (Which is precisely what Paul claims the song is in Lyrics. I can definitely understand that angle for the verses—I can imagine the kiddos particularly digging the one about polar bears—but the chorus plods into such mature, vulnerable territory that it doesn’t seem aimed at his kids at all, opening the possibility of there being multiple—and decidedly un-infantile—inspirations.)
This song finds Paul at his most unconfident, his most unassured, reminding the listener that while things were on the mend for him and John during this period, it was nowhere near perfect between them, though it might have been had they been given more time. As it stands, this was what the state of things was at the time of Paul putting out this album, with "Coming Up" being less reality and more hopeful fantasy—and it remains the state of things between Paul and John to this day.
"Nobody Knows"
We pick up the pace—and the mood—on the next track where Paul marvels at the fact that he's been able to hide some large secret for so long. Hmmm, I wonder what that secret might be...
For the most part, this song is pretty self-explanatory, though the fact that keeping things a secret is just "the way [Paul] like[s] it" is certainly something. Coming off of The Boys of Dungeon Lane, where Paul has been incredibly evasive about the lyrical inspiration behind the track "We Two"—one countless fans and reviewers have realized is most likely about John—we can still find Paul being incredibly reticent about discussing his relationship with his closest friend, often recycling the same safe anecdotes to the media rather than really interrogating their dynamic. That's certainly his prerogative, but it's interesting to see him outline it so starkly on this track, almost teasing the viewer as if to say I have secrets but I won't tell you what they are—which, hey, more power to him.
What might be the most telling part of the song, for me, is its final verse, which speaks less to the Lennon-McCartney relationship as a whole as it does its state during the strained decade which they'd just left behind:
Baby, nobody knows
And that includes you, honey (nobody knows)
I'll pay your rent
I'll do you right (nobody knows)
Most every night
But still there's nobody knows
Not only is there a lack of understanding between Paul and the public here—presumably in that he and John have been making amends, whereas the press still peddles this antagonistic narrative—but also between Paul and John as well. This certainly makes sense, as following John's death Paul had to seek constant validation from friends and associates—including Yoko—to be certain that he and John had ever even been friendly with each other. It's not unlikely to think that such doubt existed before John's passing, such as when Paul went to visit him at the Dakota and was brusquely turned away.
I'm going to skip the instrumentals (and the very short "Summer's Day Song") because I'm not nearly music-savvy enough to make any comments on them, except to regurgitate bodhdearg's fantastic assertion that the title "Front Parlour" is a reference to Paul and John's songwriting days on Forthlin Road, and head straight into the next verbal track, which is the bizarre and enchanting
"Bogey Music"
Similarly to "On the Way," we're blasted back to the past on this track where Paul does his best attempt at the famous Elvis warble. Its weird vocal distortions and echo add a decidedly techno and experimental flavor to what would've otherwise been a rather nostalgic song, which almost baits John into a sense of security through its evocation of the rock 'n' roll craze that brought them together back in 1957:
Bogey music, bogey music
Well, when the younger bogeys
Hear that bogey sound
Every little bogey
Got to bogey down
It also might allude to the early days of the Beatles immediately after being signed with Brian Epstein. In particular, it seems to mention the earliest point of contention between Paul and John during the band's professional stage: whether or not they should clean their act up.
All you little bogeys
I want you to sing along
Clean your bogey act up
And learn the bogey song
Ultimately, Paul rallied behind Brian, John capitulated, and the rest is history.
But, just like on "Waterfalls," Paul takes this potentially alienating recollection and quickly steers into more reassuring territory:
Without bogey music
Life is incomplete
You know, it is... suckers
If there's one thing John and Paul have made blatant throughout the years—if there's one thing Paul is making blatant through this album—it's that to one another, they represent rock 'n' roll. They each came to appreciate the genre independently, but ever since that day 69 years ago the two ideas—a life in music, or just music in general; and Lennon-McCartney—have forever been intertwined, both in the men's minds and in public consciousness. If Paul says life is "incomplete... without bogey music," then he's essentially saying that life is incomplete without John. Which the future would prove to be the case.
"Darkroom"
At first glance, it appears that this is just about the dim conditions used for developing photographs—something Paul himself would've been very familiar with, having a photographer for a wife. However, from the opening line we're plunged into a world of mystery and secrecy, one that feels decidedly illicit and sexy if only for the song's arrangement, which doesn't have anything to do with photography whatsoever.
Got a place
We can go
Lights are low
Let me show you to my darkroom
If there's one thing a darkroom isn't, it's a place to hang out. What with the somewhat exacting conditions needed for photos to develop, you'd be better off spending your time elsewhere. And with all those negatives you need to carefully avoid, doing the sorts of activities that often follow "low[ering]" the "lights" would probably be tedious. Which knocks a literal darkroom out of the equation. So where could the narrator—or Paul—be meeting his lover? A hotel, perhaps?
This might sound like a stretch given that a dimly-lit place that's not an actual darkroom could be just about anything, but remember, this might not be just any song we're talking about. These songs are responses as much as they're declarations of outright feeling; there's some precedent that's been set up by the songs that come before it. Luckily for us, an early demo of "(Just Like) Starting Over" might point us in the direction of this room's identity:
Why don’t we… do it in the road?! (Laughs)
A little hotel where we used to screw
A little place down in Montauk
Now I'm not saying Paul had access to this particular demo of "Starting Over." On the contrary, this seems highly unlikely and he probably heard the song for the first time with the rest of us. But if we take "Starting Over" as being autobiographical on John's part, and it being about Paul—which not only seems likely given these and other lyrics, but also has been hinted at by May Pang—then we can assume that John and Paul spent time together in hotel rooms "screw[ing]," as John put it, during the last decade. And if John can draw from those memories in "Starting Over," even if it didn't make the final cut, then Paul certainly can on "Darkroom" as well.
For more info on the hotel story, I highly suggest you check out the linked post by @i-am-the-oyster!
"One of These Days"
Now we come to the end of our album, and boy, have we had quite the journey. From promises of a better future and rehashing their past disputes, to mentioning the past as far away as their Quarrymen days and as recent as their frequent (at least sexual) reunions in Montauk during the 70s, McCartney II is somewhat unprecedented in encompassing the full breadth of the McLennon relationship—and all before either of them knew it was shortly going to end.
It's only fitting to bring us back full circle to these aspirations for the future which, after all this reminiscing, are now remarkably more sober and levelheaded, lacking the punch of "Coming Up" but none of its wistfulness. In particular, Paul sings
One of these days
When we both are at our ease
When you've got time to please yourself
See what's right and see what's there
And breathe fresh air, ever after
It's there, it's round
It's to be found
By you, by me
It's all we ever wanted to see
There's no immediacy in it; none of the urgency of "Coming Up." But that's because Paul doesn't need it anymore. After everything he and John have been through—after everything he's remembered over the course of this album—Paul realizes that, to borrow words off The Boys of Dungeon Lane (and one of the songs that isn't even about John, anyway), "they're going to make it through; they're going to make it alright."
And what's his reasoning for believing that? Because they're Paul and John, for crying out loud. Because they're John and Paul. Because they're Lennon-McCartney, or McCartney-Lennon. It's what they've done before, and it's what they'll continue doing until the very end.
Of course, neither of them realized that the end was quite near. McCartney II, released on 16 May 1980, came only 206 days before John's brutal assassination on 8 December in front of his New York City home. But during that time, it managed to invigorate John—and, more than that, it really touched him. When John first heard "Coming Up" on the radio, he yelled, "Fuck a pig! That's Paul!" He called the song "a good piece of work," and it even inspired him to get back into the studio and write more songs again. Just as "Bogey Music" spells out, Paul is music for John, and John will always be music for Paul—and without bogey music, life is incomplete.
A while back, I made a series of posts about the archival history of the (in)famous early demos by John of what was then "Real Life" and eventually became the songs "I'm Stepping Out" and "Real Love." I didn't say much at the time about what/who these demos might be addressing, because I wanted to get the recording history straight in my head before getting into speculation.
I've thought a lot about these demos since then. Many people in the fandom are certain they are addressing Paul, others are certain they're not, others are agnostic. Today I'm asking that question myself, looking at the demos' history, lyrical themes, and my own sense based on immersion in JP's music.
A quick summary of the historical background:
The piece of audio called the "Real Life demo" that you'll find cycling around Tumblr and YouTube is usually presented as one demo recorded by John on one occasion. However, it is actually several fragments of the same basic musical/lyrical idea, recorded at several (undated) points between the late 70s and 1980.
The fragment with the "and now a baby and another on the way, la la la la farm" lyrics is usually dated to summer 1980 (either before or after Bermuda) but that dating, like all the dating of the fragments, is not 100% certain.
Here on Tumblr, the entire piece of audio is often cited as being from 1977. This is based on an old post which matched the semi-improvised lyrics with a newspaper story from February 1977 about Paul and Linda announcing their pregnancy. There may be something to that, but it's important to note that that post was going on the assumption that the audio of all the fragments represented one recording session on one date, which isn't the case.
So it's not certain at all that any part of the recording can be dated to 1977 based on newspaper reports - but it's not NOT certain either. Like with all these things, it's good to keep an open mind. In the absence of more concrete information, I usually date the fragments to "late 1970s-1980".
As a reminder, these are the lyrics that are speculated to be about/addressed to Paul:
Was I just dreamin', or was it only yesterday
I used to hold you in my arms
And now the baby, and another on the way [laugh]
Ba la la la la farm [laugh]
And, from another fragment:
If it don't feel right, don't do it
If it don't look right, look right through it
If it don't feel right, don't do it
Just call [him/'em] on the phone.
These come from the "last" demo fragments ("Last" in quotes because it's not known if the order these fragments were played on the Lost Lennon Tapes radio show is the order in which they were recorded, although the LLT does specifically date this fragment to summer 1980, fwiw. If you want to read a deep dive into how these demos are dated, go here)
Much metaphorical ink has been spilled on the meaning of these (seemingly) improvised lyrics. Is the reference to a baby and a farm talking about the February 1977 news story about Paul and Linda? Is it talking about Yoko supposedly trying to get pregnant in early 1980, and the farm the Lennons bought in upstate New York? Is it referring to May Pang? Is it just meaningless filler words?
Cases can be made for all of the above, and many more besides, I'm sure. I don't strongly believe or disbelieve any of them. The process of songwriting (like all creative work) is so diffuse and tricky to pin down that an artist would probably be hard pressed themselves to identify the sources of their inspiration.
So, for me, the baby-farm lyrics aren't conclusive proof of anything, and could be interpreted many ways. That goes for all the lyrical fragments. But I still do believe that some part of this lyrical-musical working-out is addressing and/or thinking about Paul.
My reasoning for this is in no way scientific and doesn't count as "proof" in any traditional sense. However it does align strongly with the intuitive sense I get from JP's songwriting, where certain lyrical and musical themes recur and seem to be expressing "the secret code" of 'Days We Left Behind'. This is by its very nature unprovable, residing in the realm of artistic/emotional truth rather than facts and figures.
The case for my belief rests on just one word from the fragments' lyrics:
Was I just dreaming, or was it only
Yesterday
The song "Yesterday" undoubtedly held significance for JP, both positive and negative. Here's a good post summarising the history. Lots of people have noticed John's use of the word in songs that are, or may be, addressing Paul. The most obvious one, in that we know it's addressed to Paul, is "How Do You Sleep", from the 1971 album Imagine.
The only thing you done was Yesterday
And since you're gone you're just another day
A less-frequently observed unhappy Yesterday reference occurs on the album before, in the song "God":
The dream is over
What can I say?
The dream is over
Yesterday
Paul's (possible) response to the above was the song "Tomorrow" from 1971's Wild Life. Yesterday is over, time for Tomorrow...
John later included the word in "I Know (I Know)", a song written in 1972 and released on the 1973 album Mind Games. The song contains clear musical and lyrical references to the Beatles in general and Paul in particular:
Today, I love you more than yesterday
Right now, I love you more right now
As the word was used to communicate with Paul negatively, now it's possibly being used to communicate with him positively.
It's also perfectly possible that "yesterday" in the "Real Life" fragment is just a coincidence and doesn't mean the lyric has anything to do with Paul. On the surface, it's being used as a shorthand to mean "the past" as presumably the person John is addressing wasn't in his arms literally the previous day. So it can be easily "explained away", and if some piece of information came to light that proved the demos were about someone/thing other than Paul, I won't mind.
But in the absence of such evidence so far, I still "believe in Yesterday", because it makes the most sense to me from an artistic and emotional truth point of view.
is there any reason to think that "Dig a Pony" isn't about Paul? every reference in it seems to point at least tangentially to him. but perhaps i'm too mclennon-brained, or i'm misunderstanding something. (the mainstream analysis seems to be more like it's mocking the Rolling Stones or about drugs, or 'just nonsense.' I find it difficult to believe the 'just nonsense' angle.)
Hi there! First of all, it's important to remember that "mainstream" assertions of what a song is about are usually just as speculative as anything we come up with in mclennonland. The only person who can know what a song is really about is the songwriter, and unless they say what it's about, everything else is speculation. (And even then, songwriters are not necessarily honest about inspiration - looking at you, Paul). Speculation isn't necessarily wrong and can be informed by contextual information, but it can't be definitive.
The only thing John said about 'Dig a Pony' was that it was a "nonsense" song that didn't mean anything, which could certainly be true, but I think he sometimes hid behind the "nonsense" label when he didn't want to get into songs' meanings (I speculate about that tendency in my "Hey Bulldog" analysis). The mainstream theories that it references drugs, or Jagger/The Stones, could have something to them, but it's no more certain than a Paul interpretation.
The chorus "All I want is you / Everything has got to be just like you want it to" sounds like it could be addressing Paul. For that reason, it also could plausibly be addressing Yoko - John sure did have a type! Although the tone of the address sounds more like it's addressing someone who's not currently "with" the singer. YMMV.
The line "You can imitate everyone you know" sounds more like Paul, with his demonstrated ability to do impressions. And "you can penetrate anyplace you go" is, ehh, suggestive. But because these lyrics are so mysterious, someone could easily parse them as being about someone or something else.
My suspicion is that the seemingly "nonsense" lyrics actually made sense to at least one other person, and that person could be Paul. At the same time, I'm not particularly wedded to the theory as I recognise that it's impossible to know for sure. So I can't definitively answer what it's about, but more importantly, neither can the "mainstream" interpreters. We're all just vibing out here :)
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality✓ Free Actions
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
We have a special treat for you all! Instead of our usual articles, for the next two weeks we will share our thoughts on Paul's new album The Boys of Dungeon Lane. This week, we discuss Side A. What do winding journeys along the road, operas, phallic fungi, and the passage of time all have in common? Find out in our review!