Maid of Blood's Corner

Caption:

[ (stitch with @/sorrel.hartley) What’s the most like “chronically online” take you’ve ever seen on the internet?

I have recieved a comment telling me that it was transphobic to be comfortable with my masculine body as a nonbinary person. Like, (frustrated noise). there is so much to unpack with that take but I’m gonna focus on tiktok and tumblr’s perception of nonbinary people and how damaging that is to the community.

This idea that all nonbinary people must, like you know be fucking mullet, big eyeliner, fucking skinny, white, afab. Do you like frogs, do you like mushrooms? Shut the fuck up. I sometimes feel like my pronouns are rarely accepted because its like if you don’t look in my bio you hear my voice and it’s like, oh- Makes me so angry.

Tiktok and tumblr basically set themselves up for failure when they created this perfect perception of what a nonbinary person looks like. And god forbid if you don’t fit into that box, guess you’re not valid. Me being amab does not make me any less nonbinary and you’d think thats a given but for some people its just, you know- Do you like frogs or mushrooms? I’ll kill you, what the fuck.]

Note: The issue isn't the people who fit the stereotypes, it's the stereotypes being used to determine who's "actually" nonbinary.

Today’s classpect is Sylph of Doom

Nothing of this is canon, only headcanons, shouldn’t be taken as the only truth

The Sylph of Doom. The one that let others create through Doom or let others create Doom

The Sylph. A Passive (+), female-alligened class which lets other create through [ASPECT] or let others create [ASPECT]

Doom: Futility, Rules, Restrictions, Fate, Sacrifice, and in some cases Death

——————————

Personality: They would be really careful people, never taking risks, but always pushing some buttons without wanting, maybe throwing a rock to someone really violent and letting death happen, but also could be someone that follows the rules really closely, making themselves really strict on the process, but also they would try to see most bright side of things when fate occurs, if anyone bullies a friend they would go defend their friend, indirectly putting an end to the bullying and making their friend happy in the process, also she would understand that letting some things go is the best way to heal 

——————————

Powers: A Sylph of Doom would be a TOP tier support, they would give the debuffs to the enemies and great buffs to the allies, they could also create stupidly specific rules to make the enemy more limited on their abilities, playing with them would be really easy and could be your winner card in a session! Someone I want in MY session definitely >:O)

——————————

Quadrants:

Sylph of Doom <3 Thief of Mind. I see this as the Sylph always helping the Thief to get out of trouble and the Thief always taking a using the logic to get away from trouble the Sylph, also, the Sylph would make the Thief know it’s limits and not making it make anything very stupid

Sylph of Doom <> Mage of Life. I see this as the Sylph being someone too restricting and the Mage showing it that some chaos is needed for the life, and it’s even healthy, but the Sylph also would help the Mage understand that rules are as necessary as chaos, basically complimenting each other

1. sarah Z drops a two hour long homestuck video, wherein she cites gio’s articles about hiveswap’s development

2. aysha @’s sarah z on twitter to inquire as to why she wasn’t contacted in the making of this video. gio replies with a mildly snippy tweet referencing the fact that whatpumpkin never responded to any of his attempts for contact in writing his own article

3. barely relevant but its literally always funny to me how people who are deep up the homestuck team’s ass think the fact that they are queer means that they are exempt from any criticism. girl. 

4. in a private patreon discord server aysha calls gio a stalker and says ‘go get this bitch’ and links to gio’s twitter. i feel like for reference here it’s really important to note that gio has like, around 500 twitter followers and is not exactly a massive presence.

5. meanwhile on mastodon it seems like kate is also engaging in some really good and functional adult behavior as well

This tweet doesn’t condemn being horny on main. It’s explicitly saying that most sex scenes are gratuitous and unneeded. There is literally no need for something like a teen drama to show in such detail the intricacies of sex to a target demographic of minors. And don’t give me the “Well it’s important to their lives” excuse, because that only applies to shows which seek to educate and not shows that perv on the bodies of its actors who are meant to be playing teenagers.

Firstly, if you made it to the internet without realizing that when somebody says “All of this thing is bad” and that there are always exceptions in those statements, congratulations! You have the same level of literacy as those men who hear “Men are trash” and then sob hysterically about how its totally not all men.

Secondly, this whole discourse is very much veiled in a lot of ace exclusionism. Sex isn’t a big part of relationships for most people, period. If you look at a romantic relationship and go “Well this is a sexual thing” then you’re not only being kinda shitty to asexual people, but you’re also exemplifying the very toxic mindset that if you aren’t having sex in a relationship then something must be wrong. Romance and romantic relationships, or hell even just physical intimacy in general is not an inherently sexual thing. You can hold hands and not thing about sex, you kiss and hug and not think about sex. You can cuddle and enjoy the physical act of touching without it being sexual.

Thirdly, you don’t have to show a sex scene to let the audience understand that characters have had sex. The fact you wanna show that in such graphic detail is entirely about horny. If the audience having the knowledge that these characters made it to the next stage of their arc is what’s really important, the implication is enough. Especially in situations where the target demographic is minors. Sorry you want to be horny with teen dramas, but there is a time and place.

This tweet doesn’t condemn being horny on main. It’s explicitly saying that most sex scenes are gratuitous and unneeded. There is literally no need for something like a teen drama to show in such detail the intricacies of sex to a target demographic of minors. And don’t give me the “Well it’s important to their lives” excuse, because that only applies to shows which seek to educate and not shows that perv on the bodies of its actors who are meant to be playing teenagers.

Firstly, if you made it to the internet without realizing that when somebody says "All of this thing is bad" and that there are always exceptions in those statements, congratulations! You have the same level of literacy as those men who hear "Men are trash" and then sob hysterically about how its totally not all men.

Secondly, this whole discourse is very much veiled in a lot of ace exclusionism. Sex isn't a big part of relationships for most people, period. If you look at a romantic relationship and go "Well this is a sexual thing" then you're not only being kinda shitty to asexual people, but you're also exemplifying the very toxic mindset that if you aren't having sex in a relationship then something must be wrong. Romance and romantic relationships, or hell even just physical intimacy in general is not an inherently sexual thing. You can hold hands and not thing about sex, you kiss and hug and not think about sex. You can cuddle and enjoy the physical act of touching without it being sexual.

Thirdly, you don't have to show a sex scene to let the audience understand that characters have had sex. The fact you wanna show that in such graphic detail is entirely about horny. If the audience having the knowledge that these characters made it to the next stage of their arc is what's really important, the implication is enough. Especially in situations where the target demographic is minors. Sorry you want to be horny with teen dramas, but there is a time and place.

This tweet doesn't condemn being horny on main. It's explicitly saying that most sex scenes are gratuitous and unneeded. There is literally no need for something like a teen drama to show in such detail the intricacies of sex to a target demographic of minors. And don't give me the "Well it's important to their lives" excuse, because that only applies to shows which seek to educate and not shows that perv on the bodies of its actors who are meant to be playing teenagers.