Stefan's Internet Hole

That’s a great question.  When were in the document and block-out phases of developing a Pillars/Deadfire level, one of my requirements for area designers was a screen grid placed over the map.  This was an important step to help everyone understand scale and to understand what the player would see at any given point on the map.

This isn’t a real block-out/mock-up, but for the sake of illustrating what I’m talking about, I put some vague screen guidelines over this map from Gamepressure.

When I look at this map, I’m looking for any sections of open ground that cannot see edges of physical features on a normal screen view, at which point the player may become disoriented.  I’m also looking for distinctive features that can help the player orient themselves: the two different tower ruins, the obelisk, the palm tree, the xaurip camp, the quicksand, the VTC camp, the edges of the oasis, and the entrance to the ruins themselves.

On interiors, we try to do the same thing, but also paying attention to things like differences in lighting, differences in prop decoration, and so on.  Dungeons can be very disorienting and we intentionally avoided using minimaps or guide arrows on the main game view.  This puts a heavier responsibility on us as designers to ensure that players can intuitively navigate through the space by using the physical features of that space.

Here is an example from Pillars 1.  I don’t do much area design these days, but on Pillars 1, I did the documentation layout (but not actual block in or area design) for six exterior maps.  This is Magran’s Fork, which was a “4x4″ -- a term we have used since Infinity Engine days to define the number of screens that a map take up.  For us, 1 screen = 1920x1080 pixels.  At some point, Pillars 1′s lead area designer, Bobby Null, came up with a % to follow that, e.g. 3x3x50%, which indicated that 50% of the screenspace was empty -- useful for dungeons with a lot of negative space.

This way of defining a map helps production and environment artists a lot when we’re scheduling work.  Anyway, here’s my map:

While there are a few spots that are simply “open ground” (or light forest), I placed landmarks throughout the map to help with orientation.  Note that at this point I was not designing content for the area, simply a physical layout.  Area designers created the content much, much later.  This process is atypical, as area designers usually define their own map layouts, but was necessary in this case because we had more environment art time than area designer time and I felt confident in my ability to do a solid wilderness area layout.

Here’s the actual map, again courtesy of Gamepressure:

While it is not 1:1, it’s quite close, and the artist added additional physical features to help further aid navigation.

The process isn’t foolproof, but it provides a solid foundation that allows for relatively easy navigation and re-traversal without requiring a mini-map, which was the goal.

As a side note, the Deadfire world map was not designed with the goal of making the player feel secure while exploring.  Exploring while sailing in Deadfire requires the player to spend a fair amount of time in open water with no landmarks at all to guide their way.  I intentionally developed and tweaked the layout of the map to induce a measure of insecurity and (mild!) anxiety when venturing out into open water.  If the player was navigating into open water without a specific destination in mind, I wanted them to feel some unease about what could happen.

a huki plush from mnog

edit: this little guy