it isn’t that straight women can’t be feminists. it is more that the vast majority of self proclaimed “feminists” simply don’t want what feminism entails. at least, not to me, lol. feminism’s goal is the abolition of gender. straight women who actively seek love from men generally do not want this as it would end heterosexual ideology. being a gender abolitionist is alienating to the primary benefactors of gender hierarchy; most of their male suitors wouldn’t like that they want to end the very framework that gives them social power and a sense of identity lol. they should never lead a feminist movement unless they are prepared to face the possibility that most men may not like them very much and their dating prospects may be diminished. they are incentivized to water down their commitments to feminism by seeking love from men. they don’t have to do it, but they do it anyways.
lesbians, asexuals and celibates should be at the forefront of any feminist movement. while any woman can be a male supremacist, lesbians, asexuals and celibates have greater potential to not gaf about appeasing any man ever. the primordial soup of a feminist revolution will always be with them first, i think. nothing precludes straight women from having the principals of the dyke, but today’s straight “feminists” are simply weak. that’s all really. cowardice and weakness. every revolutionary movement has to engage in strikes or resistance from the machine. refusing to have sex with men can be a tactic in conjunction with other forms of resistance and striking. look at how insane people are with regard to low birth rates. imagine if it was organized. even the slightest whiff of organization around refusing sex with men, such as 4B, made people rabid and scared. the world collapses if enough women just say no. and we radical feminists want that collapse.
tangentwithtanner
vaporwave
dailybridgerton
annaxmalina
theartofmadeline
romaincrisis
andulkaphoto
