Untitled

What could be more improve are having hands on projects, it would be more difficult for this type of class. But this method does help me better understand a topic or material. There were just enough group activities and the lessons felt organized. Not random information thrown at you. 

I can translate my writing process to other work outside of class with internships and resumes. I have’t yet used this since I’m not looking for extra circulars but I have started ideas to execute. But the time have used the writing process was for my UNI research paper. Usually I would skip the outline but decided to use one. It made the process less harder and less rushed. 

The most challenging semester was the rhetorical analysis, since creating a argument and staying on topic was difficult for me. I feel as though my writing has improve but the way I work has, if it makes since. The first assignment was easier since it was about me but still I feel as though it was my best one. I feel as though spending more time on it like I did with the first could help me improve. Leaving it at the last minute and rushing, doesn't work well for me. I need to create a timeline and stick to it. 

Humanities as major is just as beneficial as a STEM major for med school. More admissions look for humanities major since it says a lot about a person. And people in humanities tend to live happier lives in their specialty and their personal lives. No, the argument is similar to the original argument but does expand on their topic. 

It’s important to evaluate the source because having an uncrediable source leaves you having false information. And spreading that false information to your audience. The most important thing that I learned from the reading is that, that articles should provide citations. This knowledge changed how I read or think about an article because, I would know that the information is reliable because of its backed up information.  It also helps looking for other sources that present similar information. 

2.The counter argument for the article that while humanities can help you become more domestic and compassionate, it’s not going to benefit as much as a STEM major. 

The author didn't provide any direct quotes but would reference other studies and medical articles. The writer provides context before referencing. She uses. a study found or in 2009 study etc. Yes, because it back up their claim on why humanities is successful for undergraduates. I feel though that the article could be more effective if there were quotes. With my paper I did provide a direct quote but also reference the article like the writer did.

For my ap language and composition class, our teacher had us peer review but anonymously through a website. When I got back my assignment, people stated that they liked it but thought I was off topic. I decided to change it up and have my teacher review it, but he also said it was off topic. The most helpful was they were honest in their critiques but also didn’t elaborate on it. I would instead have it be face to face, so there would’t be any miscommunication. 

The author empathize more pathos with their personal experience of becoming a doctor and patient experience with doctors. And pathos was more successful in delivering the message