we're not kids anymore.
dirt enthusiast

Product Placement

Discoholic đŞŠ

if i look back, i am lost

shark vs the universe
h
Claire Keane
ojovivo
Mike Driver
will byers stan first human second
Keni
Misplaced Lens Cap
art blog(derogatory)
Three Goblin Art
I'd rather be in outer space đ¸
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year

romaâ
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
noise dept.
seen from Maldives
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Netherlands

seen from Netherlands
seen from Argentina
seen from Argentina

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States

seen from TĂźrkiye
@arielfabulous

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
This is the world capitalists want to return to.
happy 10y of yuri on ice or smth
Jews Are Not White. Jews Are Not Colonizers. Jews Are ... Jews.
And decades of DNA research confirm what history, archaeology, language, religion, and memory already told us.
The entire anti-Zionist framework rests on one central lie: that Jews are âwhite European colonizersâ who stole someone elseâs land.
Without this lie, the framework collapses.
So letâs collapse it.
*The Cohen Gene - A 3,000-Year-Old Receipt*
In 1997, geneticists studying Jewish men who identify as Cohanim - the hereditary priestly class - found a distinctive Y-chromosome pattern shared across widely separated Jewish communities.
Cohanim from Europe. Cohanim from North Africa. Cohanim from the Middle East.
Communities separated for centuries, living under different empires, speaking different languages, often with little or no contact - yet preserving the same priestly tradition and related paternal markers pointing back to ancient Middle Eastern ancestry.
Later studies refined this into what became known as the Cohen Modal Haplotype and related J1/J2 paternal lineages.
You do not get that from random converts in Poland.
You do not get that from âwhite Europeansâ inventing a fake past.
You get that from continuity.
A people in exile.
A family that refused to disappear.
*Every Jewish Community on Earth Clusters Together*
In 2010, Dr. Behar and colleagues published a major genome-wide study in Nature: âThe genome-wide structure of the Jewish peopleâ.
They compared Jewish diaspora communities against non-Jewish populations from across the world.
The result was exactly what Jewish history predicts: Jews from Iraq cluster with Jews from Europe. Jews from North Africa cluster with Jews from the Middle East. Jewish populations across the diaspora are genetically closer to one another than to the non-Jewish populations among whom they lived.
Ashkenazi Jews are not simply âPolishâ.
Mizrahi Jews are not simply âIraqi".
Sephardi Jews are not simply âSpanishâ.
Yemenite Jews are not simply âYemeniâ.
They are Jews.
A distinct people, dispersed across the world, but still genetically connected to one another and to the Middle East.
Ashkenazi Jews, in particular, consistently show Middle Eastern ancestry mixed with later European admixture - exactly what you would expect from an ancient Levantine people that spent centuries in Europe while remaining largely endogamous.
Jews are from Judea.
It is in the name.
It always was.
*The Disease Profile - A Fingerprint That Cannot Be Forged*
If Ashkenazi Jews were simply Europeans, they would look genetically like the European populations around them.
They do not.
Ashkenazi Jews carry certain inherited diseases at rates radically different from surrounding European populations: Tay-Sachs, Gaucher disease, Canavan disease, familial dysautonomia, Niemann-Pick, and others.
That is not what happens when a population simply blends into Europe.
It is what happens when a small exiled people survives for centuries while marrying mostly within itself.
Geneticists have estimated that the Ashkenazi population passed through an extreme founder event - a very small ancestral population that later expanded dramatically.
Not hundreds of thousands of random Europeans.
A small, endogamous Jewish population.
A tribe.
A nation in exile that refused to dissolve.
*âBut Ashkenazi Jews Look White!â*
Skin color is not ancestry.
Appearance is not origin.
A small number of genes influence pigmentation. Those traits can shift over generations through climate, geography, and selection. They are the paint job, not the engine.
Ashkenazi Jews spent centuries in Europe. Many became lighter-skinned.
That did not make them European in origin.
The same way the Romani did not stop having South Asian origins because they lived in Europe.
The same way Armenians did not become French because some lived in France.
The same way Jews did not stop being Middle Eastern because they survived in Europe.
*The Khazar Lie*
The claim that Ashkenazi Jews are âreally Khazar convertsâ has been used for decades to sever Jews from Judea.
It is politically useful.
It is not serious science.
In 2013, Behar and colleagues published a direct response: âNo Evidence from Genome-Wide Data of a Khazar Origin for the Ashkenazi Jewsâ.
The title says almost everything.
The Khazar theory survives online because it gives antisemites what they need: a way to say the Jews are fake, Jewish history is fake, and the Jewish connection to Israel is fake.
But the genome-wide data does not say that.
*Now Letâs Talk About Palestinian DNA*
The claim is usually framed like this:
âPalestinians are the indigenous people. Jews are foreignâ.
But the DNA tells a much more complicated story - and a much less convenient one.
Serious studies do not show a pure, unchanged Palestinian people existing in the land from antiquity until today.
They too show what history shows: a mixed regional population shaped by conquest, migration, Arabization, conversion, intermarriage, Egyptian and North African input, Arabian tribal input, and broader Levantine ancestry.
That is the history of the region.
The Levant has always been a crossroads. Empires passed through it. Armies settled in it. Tribes migrated into it. Populations converted, mixed, changed language, changed religion, and changed identity.
*Arabs Are From Arabia. It Is in the Name.*
The Arab conquest of the Levant began in the 7th century.
Before that, the population of the region was not âPalestinian Arabâ. It included Jews, Samaritans, Aramaic-speaking peoples, Greek-speaking Christians, local pagans, and others.
After the Arab conquest came Arabization.
Local populations gradually adopted Arabic language, Arab identity, and Islam. Some intermarried with Arabian tribes and conquerors. Some converted. Some changed identity over time.
Palestinian Y-chromosome studies (Nebel et al. 2000, 2001) show 30-40% haplogroup J1 - with specific sub-clades (J1-L858) directly linked to Arabian tribal expansion after the 7th century. That's not "ancient Levantine." That's Arabia. Literally.
Jews are from Judea. The "Palestinian" Arabs are from Arabia.
*âLevantine DNAâ Does Not Mean âFrom Israelâ*
This is the sleight of hand almost nobody notices.
When geneticists say Palestinians have âLevantine ancestry,â activists translate that into: â'Palestinians' are indigenous to 'Palestine'".
But that is not what âLevantineâ means.
The Levant is a broad region. It includes modern Israel, Jordan, Lebanon, Syria, parts of Turkey, and surrounding areas.
Having Levantine ancestry does not automatically mean your ancestors came specifically from Jerusalem, Hebron, Jericho, the Galilee, or Judea.
*Palestinians Are Not One Unchanged Ancient People - They Are a Crossroads Population*
Palestinian genetics reflects the history of the land itself: layers of conquest, migration, settlement, conversion, and intermarriage.
Different Palestinian communities show different patterns.
Bedouin populations often show stronger Arabian affinities.
Gaza has historical Egyptian, North African, and sub-Saharan African input.
Northern populations may show stronger links to Syrian and Lebanese populations.
Coastal populations reflect broader Mediterranean history.
That is not what a single pure, unchanged indigenous population looks like.
It is what a crossroads population looks like.
It is history.
And it destroys the simplistic propaganda line that Jews are foreign Europeans while Palestinians are the sole native people of the land.
*âPalestinians Are the Real Jewsâ - The Most Cynical Lie*
Some activists now claim that Palestinians are actually the descendants of ancient Israelites who never left.
This argument collapses on contact.
The Samaritans make the point clear. They are a tiny surviving Israelite-related community that preserved continuous identity, practice, and connection to the land for thousands of years.
They are not interchangeable with modern Palestinian Arabs.
*The Bottom Line*
For 2,000 years, the world told Jews they did not belong in Europe.
âGo back where you came from.â
So they did.
And now the same world says they do not belong there either.
But they do - because Jews are from Judea.
The DNA says what history says.
What archaeology says.
What language says.
What Jewish prayer says.
What Jewish memory says.
What the name itself says.
A Middle Eastern people with an ancient, continuous, documented connection to the Land of Israel.
The DNA confirms what history already showed.
- Special thanks to Dr. @lhilitte who contributed this scientific review.
@destinationXIX
God, can you imagine someone from Finland (or wherever) heading to a Midwestern state fair and eating every variety of fried thing imaginable?
I can, and arguably I must.
I always think that sport events, especially international ones, are primarily about fun and cultural exchange and hanging out together; it gets lost sometimes when people pay too much attention to keeping scores, but joy and building bridges should be more important. So glad this seems to be happening right now!
Oooh, they introduced Scotland and Haiti to tailgating in Foxboro!! You just TRY and stop a New England sports fan from tailgating at Gillette!!
Kilts at Red Sox games!! While they did not understand the game of baseball they had a whale of a time anyway and did soccer chants the whole time! đ¤

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
The Thirteen Principles of Bagel Faith
Recently a non-Jewish friend asked for my opinions about bagels. Thus have I endeavored below to record the fundamental truths of my religion. Other Jews with differing regional and culinary minhags are welcome to make their own post.
BEST BAGEL FLAVORS: (in no particular order) sesame, poppyseed, onion, garlic, egg. Consider the toppings you're choosing as well.
THE EVERYTHING BAGEL: Like pumpkin spice, a creative flavor somewhat overexposed. A reliable choice if you fear the bagel is mediocre, as the spice combination may mask other flaws.
CINNAMON RAISIN/BLUEBERRY/SWEET BAGELS: Foolish. Cinnamon raisin bread already exists, why sully a bagel with it?
'RAINBOW' BAGELS: Marketing trick.
CREAM CHEESE FLAVORS: Plain, scallion, or vegetable only. Lox spreads are inevitably a mistake, because if the fish were good quality, they wouldn't waste it on a mix-in. Strawberry cream cheese is for children. Other flavors are for apostates and heretics.
DEPTH OF THE 'SCHMEAR': Not thicker than the height of one bagel half, or the length of your thumbnail.
LOX: Of course, if it's fresh. If the deli calls it "Nova" or "Gravlox", you're in good hands. (Whitefish: yes. Herring: better on crackers.)
CAPERS: Yes, if assembling the works (lox, tomato, red onion...)
TO TOAST OR NOT TO TOAST? Contextual. Toasting a freshly-baked bagel is a sin. Toasting a stale or sub-par bagel is a necessity.
SUPERMARKET BAGELS: Pointless. Just buy a loaf of bread instead.
SUPERMARKET CREAM CHEESE: Perfectly reasonable, but if you're catering an event you will save the stress of broken plastic knives if you buy whipped instead of block.
NEW YORK BAGELS: You can find excellent bagels outside of New York and you can certainly have disappointing bagels in New York, but the best bagels in NYC are better than anywhere else. Sorry.
MONTREAL BAGELS: A separate food group to be evaluated on its own terms, as deep-dish pizza is to thin-crust margherita. When in Montreal, I did not enjoy mine but that was an error of perspective, not of the bagel. I hope to visit again someday and correct this.
Bonus: a good bialy is much harder to find, but better than a bagel.
is anyone else annoyed that "ai" encompasses both chatgpt and tools we train to do repetitive tedious work for us. and by the ripple effect of articles like "scientists develop ai to detect cancer early" that make people argue for the merit of chatgpt or become anti-medicine. and by the general state of the world and society
i have a suggestion
Bisexuals. Everybody wants us, but no one "wants" us. Hey, lesbians! What did we ever do to you, besides lead you on and break your heart?
Hannah Einbinder: Everything Must Go (2024) dir. Sandy Honig
I love that there's often look of an absolute despair on Rumi's face when you draw her. It fits her so well.
Thank you!!
I'm a huge fan of her kind of deer-in-the-headlights stare too. Actually I love all three of her Rumi Emotions TM: Bewildered himbo; sulky princess; awkward goofball

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
hate when men complain about how theyre not allowed to be vulnerable and people will be like "and who set that system up?" as a gotcha moment. stop acting like patriarchy was funded by calling in Every Man Ever in a room and letting them all singularly decide if they wanted it. patriarchy hurts everyone in different ways, they're allowed to complain and you shutting them down and telling them to stop complaining are doing exactly what toxic masculinity wants you to enforce
âAnd who set that system up?â
Thatâs one question to ask, sure.
But when a little boy is being told by his mother to suck it up or else heâll never be a real man?
Thatâs a woman placing that systemâs constraints upon her son. She didnât set it up any more than her son did, or her father did. But she is being the enforcer of the system.
We need to stop talking about patriarchal systems as though the current men who live under it made it, and we also need to stop talking about patriarchal systems as though they are ever only enforced by men.
And, as OP pointed out. By doing the, âand who set the system up?â at a man expressing that heâs constrained in certain ways by the patriarchy, youâre dodging the opportunity to deconstruct toxic masculinity (a crucial element of the system) and are instead enforcing that over him.
The reality is that men are hurting and that the whole culture responds to them by saying, âPlease do not tell us what you feel.â I have always been a fan of the Sylvia cartoon where two women sit, one looking into a crystal ball as the other woman says, âHe never talks about his feelings.â And the woman who can see the future says, âAt two P.M. all over the world men will begin to talk about their feelingsâand women all over the world will be sorry.â If we cannot heal what we cannot feel, by supporting patriarchal culture that socializes men to deny feelings, we doom them to live in states of emotional numbness. We construct a culture where male pain can have no voice, where male hurt cannot be named or healed. It is not just men who do not take their pain seriously. Most women do not want to deal with male pain if it interferes with the satisfaction of female desire. When feminist movement led to menâs liberation, including male exploration of âfeelings,â some women mocked male emotional expression with the same disgust and contempt as sexist men. Despite all the expressed feminist longing for men of feeling, when men worked to get in touch with feelings, no one really wanted to reward them. In feminist circles men who wanted to change were often labeled narcissistic or needy. Individual men who expressed feelings were often seen as attention seekers, patriarchal manipulators trying to steal the stage with their drama. When I was in my twenties, I would go to couples therapy, and my partner of more than ten years would explain how I asked him to talk about his feelings and when he did, I would freak out. He was right. It was hard for me to face that I did not want to hear about his feelings when they were painful or negative, that I did not want my image of the strong man truly challenged by learning of his weaknesses and vulnerabilities. Here I was, an enlightened feminist woman who did not want to hear my man speak his pain because it revealed his emotional vulnerability. It stands to reason, then, that the masses of women committed to the sexist principle that men who express their feelings are weak really do not want to hear men speak, especially if what they say is that they hurt, that they feel unloved. Many women cannot hear male pain about love because it sounds like an indictment of female failure. Since sexist norms have taught us that loving is our task whether in our role as mothers or lovers or friends, if men say they are not loved, then we are at fault; we are to blame.
from The Will to Change: Men, Masculinity, and Love by bell hooks
When a man earnestly tries to verbalize the immense pain and suffering he experiences under patriarchy, and your response is a witty quip that shifts the conversation away from vulnerability towards mockery and blames him for the existence of the system both of you were born into without choosing, you are acting as a patriarch would like you to act: man up, shut up.
(Also, before anyone gets mad at hooks, the above quoted section comes right before she discusses the fear of violent men and the difficulty of women and men, in confessing how much they fear the men in their lives, referencing her own family's experience with her violent and abusive father. She is not ignoring or ignorant of (cis) male violence when she talks about love and loving men.)
Alan Turing and Ada of Lovelace did not invent computer science for the girls and the gays to claim they can't do math
fact: in the witch hat atelier setting, they use the term 'clockmark' as to delineate time
observation 1: to the best of my memory there is not a single point in the entire manga where an actual clock is present and visible
observation 2: their medieval-analogous society does not seem to have the scale of precise machining that you'd need for mechanical clocks to be a household object
observation 3: significant amounts of technological innovation in this setting seems to be, very understandably, contraption-oriented
conclusion: precise timekeeping is something that has historically been possible only via magical clocks up to this point
theory: the principle signs and sigils that are used to track time are the same ones that are used to alter or distort it, so it's all forbidden. 'clockmark' is a linguistic holdover from pre-pact but almost nobody in this setting actually knows what a clock is
AU where the women in straight porn just grunt and say stuff like "take that big pussy, bitch" while the men scream and moan and convulse and arch their backs while shouting "Oh my god! You're wrecking my dick!"
So... I found this and now it keeps coming to mind. You hear about "life-changing writing advice" all the time and usually its really notâbut honestly this is it man.
I'm going to try it.
I love the lawyer metaphor, because whenever I see âJohn knew that...â in prose writing I immediately think âhow? How does he know it?â Interrogate your witnesses. Cross-examine them. Make them explain their reasoning. It pays dividends.
All of this, but also feels/felt. My editor has forbidden me from using those and itâs forced me to stretch my skills.
This is your "show not tell" advice explained!
Editor here.
First, let me preface this with something very important: you can treat all of this advice as SECOND-DRAFT ADVICE. It is so much easier to rewrite this kind of stuff once you have words on the page. Telling yourself the first draft is totally appropriate and acceptable.
What weâre talking about here are FILTER WORDS (and to some degree verbs of being). Yes, âthoughtâ words are included. But so are âheard, saw, looked, tasted, smelledâ etc.âmost words having to do with the senses.
This isnât black and white advice; sometimes youâll use these words and thatâs okay. Theyâre not WRONG. Theyâre just weaker. And theyâre weaker because they create distance between the reader and the experience of the character.*
If you want your reader to feel like theyâre experiencing the story right alongside the character, you want to cut down on filter words.
*This is particularly important with first person and close third POVs. The reader always knows whose eyes theyâre seeing through and thoughts theyâre privy to. So you donât need to tell them âI saw X.â Or âI heard X.â Or âI thought Y.â You can just jump into the action/observation as itâs happening.
This is also where you want to pay attention to verbs of being.
âIt was rainy.â Versus: âThe rain pounded against the roof.â Or âThe rain howled like an injured animal.â Or âThe rain tapped against the window like an anxious lover.â All of these are inviting the reader deeper into the experience of the story by using stronger verbs and similes. And, at the same time, they stir feelings (instead of TELLING feelings). And feelings keep your reader engaged. Engaged readers keep turning pages; engaged readers become FANS.
This is also where
you want to pay attention
to verbs of being.
Beep boop! I look for accidental haiku posts. Sometimes I mess up.
The most valuable advice that Author Ex gave me through the years that we wrote together was this: the problem with all these filter words is that they create distance in the POV.
That means that when you read a line like
John saw that the curtains were open.
It immediately takes you OUT of the character's perspective and instead tells you what they experience as a secondhand observation.
You don't have to get fancy or purple with how you rephrase things like this. Not everything needs a ton of breathing room.
You wanna know what's perfectly impactful while keeping a tight POV?
The curtains were open.
Simple as that.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming