𝑅𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜𝑚

But will only happen if the creator actually doesn't want Iodore to be trash jerk who's only role is to get in the way of the side so called "couple" instead of coincidering what rought might be best FOR A CHARACTER LIKE IODORE AND NOT WHAT ROUGHT FOR HIM WOULD BE MORE "FITTING" FOR OTHER CHARACTERS (*cough* *cough* guestella *cough* *cough*) AND THAT PART OF THE FANDOM (aka the guestella x Kayden shippers).

But will only happen if the creator actually doesn't want Iodore to be trash jerk who's only role is to get in the way of the side so called "couple" instead of coincidering what rought might be best FOR A CHARACTER LIKE IODORE AND NOT WHAT ROUGHT FOR HIM WOULD BE MORE "FITTING" FOR OTHER CHARACTERS (*cough* *cough* guestella *cough* *cough*) AND THAT PART OF THE FANDOM (aka the guestella x Kayden shippers).

"It turns out, he wasn't. In recent months, YouTube has secretly used artificial intelligence (AI) to tweak people's videos without letting them know or asking permission. Wrinkles in shirts seem more defined. Skin is sharper in some places and smoother in others. Pay close attention to ears, and you may notice them warp. These changes are small, barely visible without a side-by-side comparison. Yet some disturbed YouTubers say it gives their content a subtle and unwelcome AI-generated feeling.

2. Why this crosses a line

Ownership: Your video is your work. Your face is your image. When YouTube silently rewrites it, they are asserting that they—not you—own how you appear on their platform.

Trust: Creators like Rick Beato and Rhett Shull rely on authenticity. If the platform itself tampers with that, it erodes the bond between creator and audience.

Consent: On your phone, you can toggle filters. On YouTube, you aren’t asked. That’s the difference between a tool you control and a platform that controls you.

Reality creep: These changes seem tiny, but they normalize the idea that media is always pre-processed. Once you accept that, the very expectation of “realness” starts to vanish.

3. Why YouTube thinks they can do this

Most people won’t notice.

Those who do notice won’t leave; there’s no real competition at YouTube’s scale.

With bigger global crises, this feels too trivial to fight. They know apathy and exhaustion keep most people quiet.

4. The deeper problem This isn’t about whether a shirt wrinkle looks sharper. It’s about power. YouTube doesn’t see itself as a neutral distributor of your work. It sees itself as the author of the experience, with full rights to “optimize” your content however it likes. Creators are just raw material. That’s why they didn’t ask: asking implies you could say no.

5. What can be done

Raise awareness. The only reason this surfaced was because creators with big audiences noticed. Keep amplifying it.

Demand control. A mandatory opt-out is the minimum. YouTube must not alter identity without consent.

Diversify. Explore Nebula, PeerTube, even Patreon-hosted video. Every bit of independence reduces monopoly leverage.

Frame the stakes. This isn’t “just a filter.” It’s a question of who owns your image, your work, your voice. If we concede that to the platform, we’ll lose the last trace of authenticity online.

Today we've got @s4turn-ly's beautiful airport piece with our favorite boys!!