Got me feeling like poprocks strawberry bubblegum

Is it top/bottom discourse or is it a valid literary critique and analysis that carefully considers the nuances of characterization and makes an approximate guess regarding how one character would like to treat or be treated in an intimate setting based on their trauma and how they have previously handled engaging with others???

It's always hard reading about the violence committed to steal America, but the buffalo is always like... That's some inhuman shit. Everyone is burning in hell for that one. Wdym there were thirty to sixty MILLION buffalo in 1800, and by 1900 there were only 300 left. THREE HUNDRED. Do you know, can you fathom the amount of purposeful cruelty required to kill NINETY NINE PERCENT of a population of an animal, just to spite and murder the living Native people who existed and thrived with them? All this, for White Power and Entitlement?? Sickening.

I think it's insane that even in the most leftist and "progressive" spaces the idea of equating morality with looks is alive and present and no one fucking bats an eye at it. like racists and mysoginysts are always portrayed as fat and hairy and generally unkept, as a contrast to the morally good and attractive leftists of course; people will have no problem being genuinely fucking awful about someone's appearance if they're deemed to be a "bad person". and the worst part is you point all of this out and people act like you're reading too much into things like no dude you gotta start using your brain more

hilarious to me that queen desire’s death, which becomes a key motivation for the trilogy’s main antagonist, happens entirely off screen 😭 nooooo one in buckkeep gaf