batman vs Jason Todd morals debat
Jason has a right to be mad he was fourteen and Batman was supposed to protect him and he didn't and that is going to be painful But no one should expect Batman to kill. As shown is official work if he had killed the joker he would have become unstable mentally, Batmans whole thing is that he believes people can change, shown in how he sends them to Arkham instead of prison, he genuinely believes these people can be better.
And for Jason it's not okay for people to stay he needs to change, he kills to protect if he changed for someone else he would be forced to live with the possibility of letting offenders reoffend, he does not want those people to be able to hurt others There is no right or wrong in this situation per say,many people fiercely defend Batmans actions but we can't ignore mistakes, he isn't a greatest father in the cannon universe no matter how much (let's be honest) we pretend he is, many people say Batman shouldn't be forced to change his ideals, or morals why not the same for Jason?
Jason isn't a cruel or evil person he is a victim of circumstance, and people hurting him and if you remember Jason was killed of due to the results of a ONLINE POLL how absolutely fucked up is that? So I'm the end there is no villain is this situation they both just need to fix this mass communication even if they don't agree with each other they should learn to except the others boundaries
