Rani | They/them, it/its, dre/drem/dris | Gray-aro ace | Witch | All posts okay to reblog unless marked otherwise | Please check the FAQ/Before You Ask (link here) before sending in an ask | Likes/follows from ask-an-andalite
With the increase in interest in radio collars and bird bands, I would like to bring to light one creator who makes such a thing that are wearable for nonhuman identifying people. : Bird Brain Leatherwork. Additionally, the business is independent and queer owned, run by a single artist and leatherworker. Her items are handmade, and by their appearance, look sturdy and well made.
These items are made with the BDSM/kink, petplay, furry, and therian communities in mind. She makes a variety of leather items such as collars and cuffs (as well as other items such as patches and LARP gear), but the following are items which specifically fit the topic of radio collars and bird bands.
Tracker Wild Critter Collar
A collar designed to give the appearance of a wildlife monitoring collar. Customizable and able to include species and ID numbers. Also includes a pocket for a GPS tracker, so your handler or researcher can keep track of you.
The Bird Band Wild Critter Cuff
Reminiscent of wildlife birdbands used for ecological research and monitoring. (Or bands used on "domesticated"/pet bird species as well.) Much like the Tracker collar, the Bird Band cuff also includes a pocket for a GPS tracker.
The Falconer Wild Bird Anklets
These cuffs are meant to resemble the anklets placed on falconry birds, with a large eyelet for proper jess (or other rope) connections.
Ear Tag Wild Critter Tag
An ear tag like those used in ecological research or ranch identification, able to be customized with your own words and symbols. Also includes a pocket for a GPS tracker, and different mounting options for small ears or fursuits. (There are other creators who have made similar Ear Tag style gear using lighter materials that may be easier to wear, if wearing the tag in the physical ear is important to the individual.)
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
ā Live Streamingā Interactive Chatā Private Showsā HD Qualityā Free Actions
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
I know this has been said before but a lot of you are pissing me off so I'm going to say it again.
Being alterhuman does not mean you have some ~special ability~ to interact with wild animals.
DO NOT go touching/chasing/ generally messing with wildlife. You aren't special and you could harm those animals, or be harmed by them. Even small things like bugs can kill you. You aren't immune to rabies.
If you scare wild animals by chasing them for species euphoria or whatever, you can genuinly kill them. Birders have a term for when it happens to birds, its called a Dread Flight. When you unnecessarily scare a wild animal, you are causing it to waste energy it needs to survive. Wildlife can't afford to waste energy. You're enjoyment is NEVER worth disturbing wildlife.
You do not have the training to rescue wild animals just because you're alterhuman. If you don't have the actual training to resue wildlife and you genuinely find an animal in need of help, CALL A FUCKING WILDLIFE REHABILITATION CENTER!!!! It isn't that hard to find the number for your local center and they'll tell you what to do, if anything, and help you if necessary.
I'm so sick of seeing alterhumans online think they can interact with wildife willy nilly just because they're alterhuman. Please fucking stop.
Iām going to use a personal example thatās not in context to wildlife but still in context to how folks treat theriform animals. Itās also specific to animals in the alterhuman community because I mainly see this with other animals, not so much nonhumans in general. Nonetheless, I hope itāll put something into perspective.
I am a horse. Iāve ridden other horses before, albeit as a guest at a ranch within my area. For the times Iāve visited my kind and interacted with them, Iāve done so under clear instruction from those who regularly take care of them, train them and work with them.
At no point have I ever gone out of my way to interact with my kind under the assumption that Iām engaging with them from one species member to another. Nor have I engaged with them under the assumption thatā because I too am a horseā I know what Iām doing. This is because I understand mindfulness is of utmost importance. Riding is a privilege, not a right. So is engaging with your local wildlife. Your behavior makes all the difference, and those consequences are often irreversible. Besides, OP already listed some pretty good reasons on why this matters.
I know folks like to get up close and personal with animals. Usually, itās to pet them, take pictures or act out to get a reaction out of them if they feel emboldened enough. In my case, they wonāt hesitate to do so without the animals, the trail boss or any other staff who work with these animals in mind, knowing damn well they donāt know these animals or their behaviors. Sometimes, these folks turn out okay but get a scolding. Sometimes, they go into full Karen Mode because the staff did their job by addressing their guestsā behavior. Iāve seen group members get kicked out because they had the bright idea of trying to sneak inside in the stables nearby. These are individual cases from the ranch near me and the trail rides Iāve been on.
Back when I went on trail rides, I didnāt make any sudden or overly touchy movements while being paired up with a horse. Iād also watch my volume once I was in proximity with my riding companion. Yes, Iām an animal like them but Iām still responsible for my own behavior. Inappropriate behavior could bring immense distress or harm the horse and even myself. The chances of an accident happening is never a guaranteed zero. Moreover, other horses arenāt going to assume Iām socializing with them as another horse. Theyāre going to assume Iām posing some kind of a threat to them or refusing to back off and act accordingly, which is something that many folksā in AND outside of this communityā need to keep in mind. Entitlement to an animalās space or existence is an issue that a lot of folks have, even if thatās not your intention! To you, it may not come off as entitlement because youāre doing something that brings you some kind of euphoria. Even so, it doesnāt change the fact that youāre using another animalās existence as an excuse to gratify yourself. Thatās not okay.
I understand wanting to express your animality. I understand wanting to be recognized among your kind or among other animals in general. I get it, but you cannot jeopardize the wellbeing of your local wildlife and any other animals for your validation.
Overfamiliarity doesnāt just happen between humans. It can happen between you and a theriform animal simply because you too are an animal and feel like thatās enough of a reason to act the way you do around them. Reconsider the next time you see that squirrel on the sidewalk or bird on a tree branch. Your actions donāt exist in a vacuum.
"Moreover, other horses arenāt going to assume Iām socializing with them as another horse."
Building off this point, you do not want your theriform conspecifics to view you as an animal like them. You may think you do, but you don't.
You do not want a bull to be territorial with you the way it is with theriform bulls. You do not want a horse to be food aggressive towards you. You do not want a cat to slap you (cat scratch fever, hello). You do not want a dog to hump you. You do not want a parrot to mate-bond with you.
You need to keep in mind that theriform animals view you as human, for the sake of your own safety and theirs.
After developing my horse otherlink, and coming to see myself as a horse, my relationship with them changed. But their relationship with me did not. And that's why I've been able to maintain a friendship with a draft horse without getting injured - because she doesn't see me as a strange two-legged horse, she sees me as a little human who's nice to her, that she doesn't need to compete with, and who stops petting her when she gets pushy they way she does with theriform horses
But to summarize: The new website is up! Artist, panelist, and staff applications are open right now and can be found here. Those forms auto-close on June 30th at 11:59pm (US East). This year's mascot vote is also open, and can be found on the same page. The mascot vote only lasts a week, so get your votes in!
The email newsletter is also being retired in favor of RSS, with more details available on the news page.
I know this has been said before but a lot of you are pissing me off so I'm going to say it again.
Being alterhuman does not mean you have some ~special ability~ to interact with wild animals.
DO NOT go touching/chasing/ generally messing with wildlife. You aren't special and you could harm those animals, or be harmed by them. Even small things like bugs can kill you. You aren't immune to rabies.
If you scare wild animals by chasing them for species euphoria or whatever, you can genuinly kill them. Birders have a term for when it happens to birds, its called a Dread Flight. When you unnecessarily scare a wild animal, you are causing it to waste energy it needs to survive. Wildlife can't afford to waste energy. You're enjoyment is NEVER worth disturbing wildlife.
You do not have the training to rescue wild animals just because you're alterhuman. If you don't have the actual training to resue wildlife and you genuinely find an animal in need of help, CALL A FUCKING WILDLIFE REHABILITATION CENTER!!!! It isn't that hard to find the number for your local center and they'll tell you what to do, if anything, and help you if necessary.
I'm so sick of seeing alterhumans online think they can interact with wildife willy nilly just because they're alterhuman. Please fucking stop.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
ā Live Streamingā Interactive Chatā Private Showsā HD Qualityā Free Actions
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Hii, this is actually a question, if Iām a night fury, does it count as fictionkin???
Well if youāre not THE night fury Toothless, then thereās a word for being a fictional species but not a fictional character and itās called theriomythic - Mod W
I hope you don't mind me raising a hand here, but - that's not quite the distinction typically made between those things, to the best of my knowledge. Theriomythic, being a subtype of therian, means an animalistic identity, as opposed to a sapient one - as does fictherian, which I think may be the term you were actually thinking of? Basically:
Theriomythic = someone who identifies as a mythical animal, such as an animalistic dragon or gryphon (this term's old enough I don't have a specific coining post, but here's a discussion on it for interest's sake)
Fictherian/fictotherian = someone who identifies as a fictional animal, such as a nexu from Star Wars (coining post)
Fictionkin still covers fictherians as well, and some prefer to just use the term fictionkin (or just the term therian, for that matter)! It's a subset, not an either-or. It's also worth noting that fictionkin does not necessarily mean identifying as a specific character - that's far and away the most commonly seen kind of fictionkin experience, so it can definitely look that way sometimes, but it includes anyone who identifies as a fictional character or species. Someone who identifies as, say, a draenei from World of Warcraft, but not a specific character who appears onscreen, is still fictionkin (and fictherian wouldn't really fit there, since draenei are sapient people).
Basically - fictionkin and fictherian would both be accurate here; I guess theriomythic also would be, since dragons are mythical creatures, but I feel like that's not going to be an especially helpful term for most night furies? It'd kind of be up to the individual to decide what term(s) are most useful for them.
whats the fictionkin thing of like i aint a character from this media....but that one area from that media? nono i was born there. im supposed to live there. not here. thats my house bro
I mean, there's nothing saying you can't - after all, most fictionkin are fictionkin before they're exposed to their source; for most it's not that they become fictionkin when they see the movie/book/whatever, but that they realize their pre-existing experiences match up with it - but I guess my question would be, what's pointing you toward it if you haven't seen the source media? How would you know whether or not you're Na'vi if you've never actually looked into them? (This assuming you haven't gone and, like, read all the artbooks and played the game(s) and whatever, because I assume if you haven't watched the movies you haven't done those things either.)
Basically - yes, of course it's possible for you to be Na'vikin without having seen the movies, but I think my first recommendation for figuring out whether or not that's the case would be to go watch at least the first movie, and/or play Frontiers of Pandora, and see how it feels. (The sequels, especially Fire & Ash, don't focus nearly as much on learning about the Na'vi and their culture because they expect you to be at least baseline familiar with them from the first movie.) That's kind of going to be step one for researching the kintype to see if it actually matches up with your experiences or not.
"On Being a Mule of the World: Reflections on Race, Gender, and Species Transition" is the latest nonfiction essay from ANIMAL by @liondrakes āļø
"'Mare' doesn't hold the same meaning to me as it does to most people. Usually, folks think of a female horse when they think of the term. That much is true from a technical standpoint, but sex isn't the reason why I consider myself as a mare. For me, it is the social implications of the term that make me feel comfortable with using it. I'm not an equestrian, but I know there's no shortage of horse owners, riders, trainers, etc. who treat fillies and mares as if they're from an entirely different planet than colts and stallions. Despite being a construct of human society, misogyny is capable of affecting any species one can think of. Oftentimes, mares are portrayed as bitchy, irritable, aggressive and harder to manage than stallions. Although I'm aggravated by this mindset, I also see myself in mares because of it."
Read the full essay on our website:
Most* lifelong singlets will never know what it's like to be literally told you are not real. Not just "oh this aspect of you isn't real" but a literal "You are not real. You do not exist and you never will."
Most lifelong singlets do not know the suffering that comes from people saying "I think you're [this other person] instead."
And this is not me saying that people denying *parts* of singlets (your disability, race, sex, gender identity, orientation, etc) isn't traumatic and horrible. It is. You don't deserve to have ANY part of you denied.
But to have someone genuinely think you are nothing. Genuinely, unironically think you *entirely* don't exist. That you are merely roleplay or imagination. That there is only one person in the body, and that it's *not you.*
That is something lifelong singlets usually do not experience.
I don't get how plurals can do that to other plurals. I don't get how you can say "Actually you don't exist. You are literally fake" when that's exactly how singlets treat you. And I don't understand how you can call that "discourse" instead of what it actually is - cruelty beyond measures. Erasure beyond measures.
I will not and cannot EVER be around someone who simply humors me as a "concept" or a "game" rather than an actual fucking existing being. Never.
-Marco (she/he), a headmate in a endotrauma system with diagnosed DID.
*There is massive solidarity to be found with singlet schizospecs who are being abusively told "you aren't real!" as an attempt to trigger derealization hallucinations. Same for singlets who are accused of being bots or faking their identity/sockpuppeting online.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
ā Live Streamingā Interactive Chatā Private Showsā HD Qualityā Free Actions
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
I grew up on transformative work. The media's done, the show's over, and I will jump over to fan content. With my worldview and upbringing, alterrealities and multiverses are par the course. I've never seen canon as the One Truth.
It's just the one that got captured and put on the big screen, in major text, or in a huge stage play. Any form of published media, really. They are also for dramatics, focusing on the big moments, the impactful moments. Even the slice-of-life sort can be a bit like that. They transform themselves as well, or they couldn't even agree with themselves. Plot holes, hello?
"Canon" feels oddly heavy for a fictionfolk. A sort of rulebook, things to abide by, expectations to follow. Sometimes it's a chain in the form of guidance. After all, how are we to discover ourselves without some hint and clue? And isn't it convenient that it's all laid out in the form of "canon" events?
Probably ties a bit back to other alterhuman that have an earthen counterpart. You got something to work with, a template, more of a hint on where you can find more about yourself or your identity. But just like the issue with canon-compliant fictionfolk, there is a possibility that you come away, binding your own foot.
They really don't need to be put on a pedestal.
Identity is a fluid thing; it is also something that we have to discover and grow into. We came from culture, tradition, and history, and they gave us something to work with; they shouldn't be the frame that boxes us forever.
Either way, back to us. None of us are "canon compliant"; canon is just a suggestion, really. We are our own people, our experiences are unique to us, we are living, and we grow.
I had to figure out that my Naruto (hearttype) was from a timeline where he never grew up with Konoha. He was part of a nomadic Uzushio village-on-the-move. Even if at one point I had looked for ramen as if it's expected that I should like it. I don't hate it, and maybe my Naruto just didn't have that history with ramen. Granted, some fans like to headcanon that the Uzumaki really likes ramen, and I enjoyed that headcanon myself. Still, it's not my experience with my hearttype.
Stellus, the dream dragons' vaguelink, was never anywhere near the battlefield of Runeterra. But before finding Stellus, we had first looked to Aurelion Sol. There were awkward bits of moments where we thought we had to embrace the haughty draconic superiority ASol exudes on screen, but we didn't feel like that.
I'm skipping over Pokemon (paraarchetrope, vague-simile) and Digimon (vaguelink); the worlds themselves already have allowance for many universes and their many possibilities and divergencies. Heck, even singular universes have variations.
Lady is a greyscale rainicorn amongst many other rainbow colored rainicorns; the Celestial Duo's story came with so many possibilities, and had come here after the event of their show's first season. They even have multiple canons of their own that come in different formats. We don't really know what's up with Daisuki, but Digimon, enough said.
Does make things messy, however, especially when some of us do engage with our own source fan content on a regular basis. But hey, quite used to that we are, fumbling about in the dark, trying everything and then creating some, figuring out ourselves along the way.
I love the topic of canon among fictionfolk. Canon is a suggestion is a great way of putting it. The experience of being ācanon-compliantā is very rare for me, but that isnāt limited to my personal experiences as fiction.
This is the case for one of my hearttypes as well.
Ghost in the Shell has no ācanonā. Although some fans see Shirow Masamuneās original manga as the core interpretation of this world, many more artists have built upon the world of Ghost in the Shell. Thereās not a single continuity thatās alike in nature apart from their focus on The Major and Section 9. Unlike other source worlds like Earth-616 in the Marvel Universe or Earth Prime in the D.C. Universe, thereās not a single version of The Majorās world that acts as the ātrueā world or timeline.
Then, thereās me. Iām a world-hopper. I experience *gateway travel where, instead of getting visitors from other worlds, Iām the one being subconsciously pulled into worlds outside of my own. Iāve overseen worlds I donāt belong to a few times, and Iāve seen many versions of Section 9. Some that have been put to paper in this world, some that werenāt. Although my heartedness is geared towards one specific Motoko, Iām still compelled to follow other Motokos and the state of their worlds.
Just as Earth isn't the central part of our solar system as many people once thought, worlds introduced as āthe true canon" aren't as central as one might assume. It's a different circumstance if that specific history is relevant to one's fictionhood; at the same time, we as a community aren't beholden to only one interpretation of ourselves, our vaguetypes, our hearttypes, our hearthomes, etc. I experience a sort of kinship and personal understanding towards Motoko Kusanagi, but I only feel this way towards one specific Motoko: The Major/Motoko as seen in Mamoru Oshiiās interpretation of Ghost in the Shell. Even then, one could say her canon diverges after leaving Batouās hideout and before the events of Ghost in the Shell 2: Innocence.
Although I also experience some kinship towards The Major as seen in Oshiiās 2004 sequel, The Major/Motoko I feel most connected with and often visit lives a more roguish life. Hopping from shell-to-shell, and oftentimes not even having a shell to begin with, sheās exploring both her world and the Net as she sees fit. Not once has she used her abilities to turn back and aid her colleagues in Section 9, which may strike some folks as āout of characterā but whatās deemed as āOOCā is a concept based within a perceived ācanonā. This Major/Motoko is still introspective as always, but sheās also learning to be more hedonistic which I think is deserved given her prior circumstances. On top of traveling to and fro, The Major/Motoko Iām closest to communicates and connects with her offspring in the Net rather than Batou or other members of Section 9, post-merging. Amidst her gallivanting, thereās room in her life for others, just not in the way some folks would expect given what they know from established worlds.
Then, thereās The Net. The Net is not a hearttype. Our connection is a plural one, but thereās not a single word (at least, in relation to plurality) that captures the kind of relationship I have with the Net. This relationship is best contextualized in its world, which isnāt the same world as my hearttype. Rather, This Net is a lot closer to Amenomibashira (Ame-no-mihashira) as seen in Shirow Masamuneās first manga for Ghost in the Shell. It feeds on information. Moreover, itās something of a hub for all walks of life. Itās not a part of me, just as it was not a part of Motoko. I am a part of it. Yet, I am not merged with The Net as Motoko was because our technology is incompatible.
The Net is a multifaceted database thatās completely digital in our shared space. It often presents as a tree, whether symbolically or literally. However, The Net Iām connected to is a lot less organic-looking. Every ābranchā looks pixelated like something out of a PC-98 game. (How fitting considering a couple of my sources actually had games on that platform.) On the other hand, I am a mech. I am magitech, to be specific. I literally consist of magical energy in the place of cybernetics or computer technology. Itās like night and day between us.
Iām using Masamuneās depiction of the net for reference since its convenience, albeit not entirely accurate to the Net I know.
Even the means in which I communicate with The Net isnāt the same as Motokoās means. I donāt traverse The Net. I donāt experience The Net as another form. The Net is interconnected with space and time far more than I am, so I feel like labeling it as a fellow world-hopper would be presumptuous at best and downright insulting to its system at worst. As I said before, thereās no words for what our relationship is like: only feeling. For a lack of better words, The Net can scan its surroundings to understand my current situation. It can also read the patterns and changes in my emotions. If it feels hard-pressed to tell me something, itāll communicate to me using an interface and project it for me to see and read.
That said, I donāt consider The Net I know to be ācanon-divergentā. It doesnāt feel one way or another about that label. From what I understand, The Net is a fully sentient ecosystem whose presentation changes depending on who or what is connected with it. I think the same can be said of many, many people who mightāve experienced something similar to our relationship.
ā[The Net] is the core system of the universe that channelers in every era, culture, and race of people have traditionally accessed. Beyond the trunk of the ātreeā, there should be no existence but the closer one gets to the end of the branches, the more growth one finds⦠and the branches are continually touching, separating, entangling, and bearing fruit,ā Project 2501 in Ghost Coast from Ghost in the Shell (1989-91) by Shirow Masamune.
Back to the topic of canon. I apply Project 2501ās assessment of The Net to canon as a concept. In theory, canon is thought to end at a single, immutable story introduced by an author or artist. This doesnāt have to be the case necessarily. Canon can grow like the branches of a tree. Our relationships with these worlds, whether we view them as fiction or not, are completely individual. Even if we share opinions on certain things regarding these worlds, our experiences or relationships with them arenāt interchangeable. The same can be said in context to how these worlds exist.
Not every fictional world is introduced to us in a similar fashion as Ghost in the Shell. Sometimes thereās a single, immutable canon put forth, and itās expected of us to accept it as is. Yet, even that ācanonā cannot escape the inevitability of growth. Whether itās someone with different recollections of said world, from an alternate version of it, or simply writing fanfiction and exploring new ideas around it, that canon is going to change one way or another. It can be expanded. It can be recreated. It can exist independently from how itās been introduced to us. We may not contextualize it as such, but thereās always been a variance to ācanonā among people.
Although I think ācanonā can be an interesting thing to analyze alongside our fictionhood, whether or not this concept holds relevance to our personal experiences is entirely subjective. In most cases, I build my own sense of ācanonā. In other cases, Iām indifferent to it because it has no influence over how I view myself or the experiences Iāve had in fictional worlds. If anything, the most engagement I get out of ācanonā is commenting on it and at most, itās done for two reasons: 1. analysis is my favorite way of engaging with fiction and 2. archetropy (I am a fourth-wall breaker). Otherwise, ācanonā is exactly as you say: a suggestion.
*I donāt specify plurality in this case because rather than travel to anotherās headspace, Iām put in a narrator-esque position where Iām completely disembodied from the world itself but I bear witness to its events and make note of them if I see fit. If I follow one person for too long, I involuntarily start to feel what they feel and experience a leak of their conscience into my own. Thatās when I step back. More āmetaā or spiritually sensitive people in these worlds can sense my presence, but by no means am I ever seen or heard. Only felt.
Happy Summer Solstice! Submissions for our very first themed issue are OPEN here at ANIMAL! Read more about our selected theme, how to submit, and what makes our themed issues different from our rolling submissions on our website. We are very excited to announce this project and hope to see you in our inbox soon! š¾
Now accepting submissions for our inaugural themed issue
Therianthropy scares us a bit, considering the majority of therians, therianāadjacent packmates (alters) & packmates in general do not believe in past lives.
Whereas therian & adjacent communities seem to require believing in such to be a therian? Makes us wonder whether or not we are allowed into these spaces or have misunderstood.
The vast majority of us are our theriotype. We've always been that.
A majority of therians do believe their theriotypes stem from a past life, but that's not part of the definition of therianthropy and never has been. The only requirement is that you identify as an animal on some level - reincarnation is the why, not the what.
The goal of this survey is to gather information of on incidences of species-based misgendering within the Alterhuman community.
Please do
Introducing a survey on Species-Based Misgendering, hosted by Duranos of The River System.
Ā Ā Ā Species-Based Misgendering: the assumption of one's gender and/or pronouns based on the expectations of one's species, stemming from biases, when the expected gender does not match the individual's gender.Ā
Ā Ā Ā Gendered Expectation: the expectation set for a species' gender, whether this bias comes from a cultural or folkoric background, establishment in a media, a linguistic framework, etc.
The survey is open both to the identities underneath the alterhuman umbrella, as well as nonhuman/human+ folks within plural conglomerates.
While this survey is primarily looking for responses from those who have been misgendered based on their species,Ā those who have not experienced species-based misgendering are welcome to complete the survey as well. Interpretation of what counts as species-based misgendering is open to interpretation by each individual, and there are long-form fillable responses throughout the survey to accommodate this.
The survey is set to close on July 31st, 2026.
I welcome folks to share the link to the survey wherever you are active in the alterhuman community.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
ā Live Streamingā Interactive Chatā Private Showsā HD Qualityā Free Actions
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
I don't fw "endo neutral" mfs btw. You can't be neutral on someone's existence. How the fuck are you neutral on if someone exists or not. That's not how that works. You either think they exist or you don't it's really fucking simple.
i think a lot of folks can relate when i say that it took so long to fully accept my alterhumanity because of the fear i was somehow a fraud-- faking this experience because my then-current identity felt... incomplete. no parts of my alterhumanity fit neatly in boxes. i can't tie any one identity to any one origin. i can't say with certainty whether they're voluntary or involuntary. i don't even fully know if my 'types are kintypes, hearttypes, etc. i'm sure there are plenty of microlabels that i can stack up to fit my experience into neat boxes, but for me that's more alienating than just. not labeling it at all.
that being said, i'm going to try to describe my identity's origin in this post, as thoroughly as i can manage. and if even one being comes across this post and feels that their identity is a little more real, i've done what i am setting out to do.
my first (and second, and third, etc.) encounters with alterhumanity
i grew up on youtube. i became a furry after watching a dance competition in 6th grade, and i hid my first fursona from everyone. i've always been a bit private.
so, it isn't surprising when i found myself watching anthony padilla's "i spent a day with" episodes on otherkin and therianthropy. my thoughts didn't go much beyond "people like that exist, that's cool" because surely if i was one of them i would know that by now.
i did some more research, if you can call it that, by watching more youtube videos by therians and otherkin. i had the thought that if i was one, i'd be a cat. i've always wanted to be a cat. but of course, i thought i would know already if i was.
the order of events gets a little blurry from here on. i bought a choker and pretended it was a collar. i got my hands on a half-mask and wore it secretly, in my room. i listened to "grow wings" and "change forms" subliminals. i made ears and tails and paws out of foam and fur and pretended it was for halloween. i watched and posted tiktoks, and cleared my search history. i read tumblr blogs, and cleared my search history. i briefly tried tulpamancy-- or that's what it was called at the time. i found daemonism. i tired quadrobics. i jumped on the trampoline to pretend i was flying. i remembered, and forgot, and remembered, and forgot.
alterhumanity was there in the bad parts too. gender dysphoria? i'm a tree. feeling invisible? well, i have wings and they don't. can't talk? try growling. try curling up like a cat and wait for the feeling to pass. the character of sophie foster got me through covid, because my experiences were hers. my pain was easier to handle when i could become something, or someone, else.
and so it went. i kept dipping my toes into alterhumanity, only to pull them right back out. my first venture into actually labeling myself didn't happen until 2024, at least 5 years after i first was introduced to the community. i tried out voidpunk, because it fit a little bit with the "coping" part of my alterhumanity. but it still didn't feel quite right.
months after that, finally, i accepted myself. i used the term otherflicker to describe my varied feeling of connection (which i later discovered is quite normal among otherkin. they just don't label it, instead saying things like "main" or "strongest" 'types). i now use the term cambikin to describe the same experience. but i'm not going to get caught up on taking you through all the labels i've ever prescribed myself here. this is about origin. i'll take it one 'type at a time.
i am a cat, and i think i always have been.
a domestic cat, probably with a tortoiseshell coat, if i had to be specific. i remember pretending to be one growing up, licking my arms because that's what cats do, crawling around on the floor and rubbing my face on furniture. even now, i still act like one around my parents-- laying in my mom's lap and waiting for head scratches, or making weird noises when i don't want to talk. i think this identity is very behavior-based, and it mostly comes from fascination and mimicry. i've never had a pet cat, but i would watch documentaries about their behavior. i wanted to come back as one in my next life. they were me, and i was them, though i didn't use those words. in this way, i guess it is a psychological identity, except for that bit about lives. i don't think i've ever fully believed in reincarnation. i believe in the universe, i guess. i believe my atoms were once stardust and then a million other things before i got here. and i do think some of my atoms are going to be a cat (i guess that's a bit physical, too).
"i am a tree" <- the name of my playlist before i knew i was a tree
the cat is probably the simplest of my identities to explain. it follows the very common story of "i've been like this since forever". my coastal redwood identity is not like that. i practically worshiped a specific redwood tree in elementary school. on tumblr i would curiously search for plantkin and feel a deep ache in my chest. i called myself a tree when i realized i was nonbinary because trees don't have human genders. they're neutral, solid, reliable. my brief period of tulpamancy included an oddly introspective moment where i reached into the back of my head and asked what's your name? my brain whispered one word, the only word i don't think i willed it to say during that time: tree. ...at this moment, it's hard to imagine i ever wasn't a coastal redwood. they're such an integral part of me. a hearthome and a hearttype and a phytantype all in one. a mix of psychological and spiritual, voluntary and involuntary, a coping strategy and something integral to myself. something like, i chose to be the tree i always was.
i'm an odd dragon.
and well, that's the beauty in draconity. there is no dragon that isn't odd. but what i mean is that i'm more wild. i'm more dragon therian than dragonkin. which is odd, because my only explanation for this identity is through the wings of fire series i obsessed over growing up, in which the dragons are definitely more intelligent. so i hesitate to call this 'type fully psychological because i cannot explain it. unique to most of my other identities, i've learned the most about being a dragon through shifts and meditation. i have fur instead of scales, four legs, two wings, and deer-like patterns and antlers. i live in the forest-- alone, most likely-- and sleep in caves and trees and by the rivers. my behavior is a little catlike, but fully dragon: i snap my teeth and growl and fly high high over the forests. if i had to give it a spiritual explanation, it would be something like... a parallel life. or a life from long, long ago before earth as we know it. but i can't say it was entirely involuntary-- i just wanted to have something, when i first accepted my alterhumanity. and a dragon seemed to fit.
i have been through many changes as a winged person.
i think this identity started when i gave my characters wings, right when it was all getting bad. 2021-2022 might've been the worst my mental health has ever been. towards the beginning, i was spiraling. towards the end, recovering (although one could question my methods of doing so). somewhere in there, i became all-too aware of being ignored. i felt invisible. like nobody could really see me. so as any normal human person would do (joke), i started to imagine that i had wings on my back. big, beautiful black wings. and nobody else could see them because nobody else can see me. but that didn't matter because i had wings. i was more than what they thought of me. i got really into poetry and the universe and being part of all of it. the wings were a symbol of spite, persistence, acceptance. ...then i started reading wingfics, after the worst of all that angst. i read about "avians" and preening and perching and all their customs. and it felt like me. so, i may have started with just the black wings, but it soon morphed into being an avianthrope-- a humanoid bird-like person. my wings change pattern from parrot to starling to fairywren because sometimes identity is a little voluntary and there's no one bird you have to be and that's okay. i have feathers on my arms and in my hair. i perch on things, i give people things, i would preen if i had the opportunity. i'm a male in that i like looking pretty. this identity was pretty much entirely a way to cope but it has become so much more than that.
i chose to be a fictionflickerer since before i knew what that was
i get too into stories sometimes. not in the obsessive way but in that i forget myself. i become the character. but that's an oversimplification. take my first memory of a fictionflicker, before i knew what that meant: sophie foster from keeper of the lost cities. a middle grade series that is still not finished as i am writing this. i read it in lockdown and had to remind myself that i was real every time i left my room-- experiencing shifts every time i sat down to read another chapter. but it was more than that, it was a conscious connection as much as parts were unconscious. i would think, how would sophie approach this? if sophie can do it, so can i. sophie went through the same thing. we are so similar that i am her. so yes, there was a voluntary reach. and there has been with my two flickers since then as well. a mix of oh god i am them and i choose to lean into this.
birds and birds and birds
i'm bird ambihearted. some but not all species. and it is due to being an avianthrope but it also isn't. it's also because i associate certain penguin species with my cultures, because i had three precious budgies for years, because parrots fly over my home and crows hang out on the sidewalks and birds are all around me. and i am so very attached.
in the eyes of a non-traditional daemian
when i first got into daemonism i didn't know it was considered alterhumanity, but it makes so much sense. my daemon is not very thought-out, one could say. i've never done any form finding, she's always a binturong, even her name is just dae. but she helps me move when i can't get myself to, she keeps me a little company. she brings me a little comfort. and through her, i am a binturong as well: subtle shifts, phantom limbs, the usual experience i have as a therian. but i'm not a binturong therian. dae is simply a binturong, and dae is simply me. as i am her. so i am a binturong. and as far as i know, daemonism is usually a thought exercise or a self-care practice but to me it is a lot messier. and that is fine.
we are all different and that is what alterhumanity is about, isn't it? we talk because that is worth talking about. and there is no requirements to saying you're a dragon, or a tree, or anything at all because alterhumanity is inclusivity. i hope you found value in my ramblings