✨️✨️Your goddess, your only angel🦋😇 ✨️✨️ She/her | 23 💘Be kind, be blessed 🌻💖 This is where I blog about manifesting my dream life and achieving all my goals. Feel free to hang around here, it's cozy and really warm😊💕
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality✓ Free Actions
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
you’re unable to drop your old story and that’s why you struggle with manifesting shifting.
so i know it’s been a long while since i posted a long little shifting help post but that’s because i been doing what i want! however, to this day i still get dms and comments asking why people aren’t shifting even though they’ve been using the law of assumption for x amount of months.
and it’s my personal belief that one of the biggest reasons is because while you’re using the law of assumption, you’re not using it to create your new reality but to cling to your old story.
you still haven’t moved past it. you still carry resentment. whether that be toward yourself for “failing,” toward time, toward other shifters who’ve gotten their results or led you “astray.” even toward shifting itself because it hasn’t happened in the way you’ve wanted it to yet.
you can’t make your new story click because underneath them are the assumptions: “i’ve been trying forever.” “i’m still here.” “why isn’t it working?” “i always end up waking up here.”
that is your story. that is what you’re actually identifying with. and every time you repeat it, you’re just giving it a stronger hold.
you try to start over and overwrite it, but the second something doesn’t go your way, you immediately return to the old story because it’s familiar to you. because it feels like home.
and your new story feels unnatural because you haven’t let yourself live there yet. you haven’t taken the time to heal the damage your old story dealt. it’s like placing brick over mold, thinking that simply covering it will take away the stench.
it doesn’t.
and before somebody says “but i’m saturating my mind with my new story x amount of times a day!” i’m not talking about repetition. i’m talking about identity.
who are you when you’re not affirming?
are you someone who micromanages your thoughts? always anxious about thinking the right things? always searching for a new method or direction? can never live in your present state for long without reverting back to something negative?
if so, it’s probably because you haven’t forgiven yourself yet.
a lot of you are trying to control every thought because you don’t trust yourself anymore. you think if you loosen your grip for even a second you’ll undo all your progress. but ask yourself why.
it’s because you’re still identifying with the version of you that “didn’t know better.” the version that spiraled. the version that thought drinking a gallon of water would be the key. the version that thought moving an inch could ruin everything.
you haven’t realized that person doesn’t need to be protected anymore.
that’s why you keep trying to control everything. control feels safe because if you’re always watching yourself, maybe you’ll never become that version of you again.
but conscious creation isn’t about controlling yourself every second of every day. it’s about trusting the identity you’ve chosen enough that you can free your thoughts. even if they’re negative. because you know, deep down, that they don’t matter.
so forgive yourself. that’s it.
forgive yourself for not knowing what you know now. forgive yourself for the months or years you spent feeling stuck. forgive yourself for every time you doubted yourself.
stop treating yourself like a lost cause.
stop trying to fight your old story and simply let it be old.
your past is not evidence. stop living like it is. choose the version of you that you know yourself to be. you don’t owe your old story loyalty just because you’ve spent a long time living it.
manifestation is instant because time doesn’t exist
the true explanation of the common term thrown around in the loa community
if you find yourself saying “but how does time not exist?” or “why don’t i have my desires?” then this post is for you
i believe almost everyone here has been confused by the common term “time does not exist”, or “manifestation is instant”. if it was instant, why didn’t i have my desires already?
time does not exist because there is no past or future. it is what you are aligning yourself with that you are experiencing.
let me go further in depth: when you are “remembering” the past, you are visualizing a moment that you associate in the past, and label it a “memory”. it is scientifically proven each time we remember something further from the present, we never remember it entirely accurate. we may add or miss details that may or may not have ever happened.
when you think about the future, you are visualizing something that has not happened yet. let’s say you have a concert tomorrow. you feel excited, you envision yourself walking or taking the bus/train to your designated area. you imagine how the music will sound, or maybe potential interactions you will have with your friends or the people around you. most importantly, you are happy in this moment, one that has not happened.
the key thing that happens with both remembering the past and envisioning the future, is that it stems from imagination. you are imagining a moment and deciding that this is what happened, or what will happen. and what is the #1 thing talked about in law of assumption? how our imagination dictates our life.
by now, i’m sure you’ve gotten my point. if not, I’ll simplify it: time does not exist, because we merely visualize a moment and label it a memory of the past, or an expectation of the future. we deem this to be true, and it is reflected into our 3D. this means that the only thing that truly exists, is now. it is the present.
so we know only the present is real, then how do we tie this back to how manifestation is instant?
if the only moment happening is the present, the moment we say “i have my desire”, it is done. we do not visualize this happening in a day, or a week, but now, because that is the only moment in time that we truly live in.
we don’t focus in what “time” has passed, because again, it does not exist. there is no delay. instead, it is an identity shift that we go through; it is the shift from aligning your inner man from being someone who identifies with the old story, into your dream self. the manifestation itself does not take time to materialize. the only reason you are still in the old story, is because you are further identifying your 3D with a moment you visualize and assign with a past memory.
your undesired past does not exist if you don’t want it to. a future filled with anxiety and fear does not exist if you don’t want it either. it always starts with the mind, and what you are imagining yourself in.
so yes, manifestation is instant. you already have everything you want!!
time doesn't exist the way we think it does. the past is just a memory you're imagining. the future is just a scene you're playing in your head. both of them are imagination. and imagination is exactly how you create your reality. so when people say manifestation is instant — they mean the moment you decide you have your desire in this present moment, it is done. not in a week. not after enough time passes. now. the only reason it feels delayed is because you keep going back to the old story in your mind and calling it real. drop the old story. live in the now where your desire already exists. that's it. 🌙✨
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality✓ Free Actions
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
How Many Things Can You Manifest at the Same Time?🦄
Oh, the classic question: “Can I really manifest more than one thing at once?” As if the universe is sitting there with a tiny clipboard, checking whether you are allowed to want love, money, peace, a home, good grades, travel, and a dream career all in the same breath. Of course you can. There is no rule that says your desires must line up one by one and wait their turn like they are standing in a queue at the bank.
A lot of people already do this in everyday life without even realizing it. Someone can know they are good at cooking and also know they are good at mathematics. Those are two completely different things, yet both assumptions can exist in the same person at the same time without clashing. The same thing applies to manifestation. Your desire for an SP, your desire for money, your desire for a beautiful home, your academic success, your peace of mind, your travel experiences, and everything else can all exist together. Nothing overlaps, nothing cancels out, and nothing becomes “too much” for you.
This is why the Law of Assumption is so powerful. It is all about what you assume to be true about yourself and your life. So instead of assuming that you can only manifest one thing at a time, assume that you are the kind of person who naturally receives multiple blessings at once. Make it normal for yourself. Make it feel simple. Make it feel like your life is always unfolding in your favor in more than one area at the same time.
Techniques like affirmations, scripting, visualizing, or any other method are just tools. They are not the power itself. Their job is to help you enter the state of being the person who already has what they want. So use them in a way that feels natural and useful for you. If affirming “I have everything I desire” feels simple and calming, then use that. If imagining yourself already living in your dream home while also being in a loving relationship and financially secure feels natural, then that is enough. You do not need to force anything.
I also have a personal way of looking at this. I made the assumption that many good things can happen in the same day, so I naturally started expecting multiple desires to unfold together. That made everything feel lighter. Instead of obsessing over whether one desire would block another, I simply accepted that life can bring me several wins at once. That mindset helped me stay relaxed, and from that relaxed state, things started feeling easier to receive.
That is the beauty of the Law of Assumption: you can mold it into your own way so it feels simple and natural instead of forced. You do not have to make manifestation complicated. You do not have to separate your desires into tiny categories and worry about which one is “more important.” You can assume that your SP is already yours, that your finances are improving, that your home is perfect for you, that your studies are going well, that your peace is protected, and that your travel dreams are unfolding too.
The real practice is to live in the end state of being complete with your desire. Feel what it is like to be someone who already has love, stability, success, comfort, freedom, and joy. You are with your SP, you are financially secure, you are working toward your dream career, you are living in the home you want, you are doing well academically, and you are enjoying peace, travel, and everything else that matters to you. You do not need to choose only one version of happiness.
What do you do if you cannot focus on the assumption of being complete with everything you want? Practice is the answer. Give yourself time, do not rush, and relax for a while. Practice is what has helped me manifest multiple things at the same time so effortlessly. Practice how it feels to be loved by your SP. Practice how it feels to be academically successful. Practice how it feels to be financially secure. Practice how it feels to live in your dream home. Feel it and assume it from the state of being. Accept it and say, “Yes, I am with my SP, I am financially secure, I am the highest scorer academically, and I am living in my dream home.” Assume that feeling. I believe practice is important.
And honestly, now I do not focus on the number of things I want anymore. When I desire something, I often make one simple assumption: it is all done, it is all mine, and everything I want is already here. That is enough for me. That is the mindset that keeps things easy, natural, and believable. So yes, you absolutely can manifest multiple things at the same time. In fact, you can assume that this is exactly how your life works.
How Many Things Can You Manifest at the Same Time?🦄
Oh, the classic question: “Can I really manifest more than one thing at once?” As if the universe is sitting there with a tiny clipboard, checking whether you are allowed to want love, money, peace, a home, good grades, travel, and a dream career all in the same breath. Of course you can. There is no rule that says your desires must line up one by one and wait their turn like they are standing in a queue at the bank.
A lot of people already do this in everyday life without even realizing it. Someone can know they are good at cooking and also know they are good at mathematics. Those are two completely different things, yet both assumptions can exist in the same person at the same time without clashing. The same thing applies to manifestation. Your desire for an SP, your desire for money, your desire for a beautiful home, your academic success, your peace of mind, your travel experiences, and everything else can all exist together. Nothing overlaps, nothing cancels out, and nothing becomes “too much” for you.
This is why the Law of Assumption is so powerful. It is all about what you assume to be true about yourself and your life. So instead of assuming that you can only manifest one thing at a time, assume that you are the kind of person who naturally receives multiple blessings at once. Make it normal for yourself. Make it feel simple. Make it feel like your life is always unfolding in your favor in more than one area at the same time.
Techniques like affirmations, scripting, visualizing, or any other method are just tools. They are not the power itself. Their job is to help you enter the state of being the person who already has what they want. So use them in a way that feels natural and useful for you. If affirming “I have everything I desire” feels simple and calming, then use that. If imagining yourself already living in your dream home while also being in a loving relationship and financially secure feels natural, then that is enough. You do not need to force anything.
I also have a personal way of looking at this. I made the assumption that many good things can happen in the same day, so I naturally started expecting multiple desires to unfold together. That made everything feel lighter. Instead of obsessing over whether one desire would block another, I simply accepted that life can bring me several wins at once. That mindset helped me stay relaxed, and from that relaxed state, things started feeling easier to receive.
That is the beauty of the Law of Assumption: you can mold it into your own way so it feels simple and natural instead of forced. You do not have to make manifestation complicated. You do not have to separate your desires into tiny categories and worry about which one is “more important.” You can assume that your SP is already yours, that your finances are improving, that your home is perfect for you, that your studies are going well, that your peace is protected, and that your travel dreams are unfolding too.
The real practice is to live in the end state of being complete with your desire. Feel what it is like to be someone who already has love, stability, success, comfort, freedom, and joy. You are with your SP, you are financially secure, you are working toward your dream career, you are living in the home you want, you are doing well academically, and you are enjoying peace, travel, and everything else that matters to you. You do not need to choose only one version of happiness.
What do you do if you cannot focus on the assumption of being complete with everything you want? Practice is the answer. Give yourself time, do not rush, and relax for a while. Practice is what has helped me manifest multiple things at the same time so effortlessly. Practice how it feels to be loved by your SP. Practice how it feels to be academically successful. Practice how it feels to be financially secure. Practice how it feels to live in your dream home. Feel it and assume it from the state of being. Accept it and say, “Yes, I am with my SP, I am financially secure, I am the highest scorer academically, and I am living in my dream home.” Assume that feeling. I believe practice is important.
And honestly, now I do not focus on the number of things I want anymore. When I desire something, I often make one simple assumption: it is all done, it is all mine, and everything I want is already here. That is enough for me. That is the mindset that keeps things easy, natural, and believable. So yes, you absolutely can manifest multiple things at the same time. In fact, you can assume that this is exactly how your life works.
We are so privileged to know the Law of Assumption. Not everyone understands that reality begins within. Once you truly get that, everything becomes so much simpler.
So stop wasting your time wondering when it will happen. Your desire isn't somewhere far away waiting to arrive. It's already within you. Your only job is the mental work.
Assume it. Accept it. Persist in it.
That's it.
You don't have to force, chase, or keep searching for the next technique. Just stay loyal to your assumption until it feels natural. Reality has no choice but to reflect the state you consistently occupy.
This is truly a game changer. The simpler you keep it, the easier it becomes.
ik crazy ahh title, but this is something that has worked for me.
name your 'subconscious' something. something personal/weird whatever. and treat it like your best friend. your subconscious listens to EVERYTHING. it's there to be helping you. (cuz it's lit you but okay) so just talk to it like
"[name] omg i'm so happy we're shifting tonight. i know you're gonna help cuz you're in charge tonight"
"[name] we're going to get into the void. I'M SOOO HAPPY YOU'LL HELP ME!!"
idk why it worked, but it helped me manifest a lot.
2. name your doubts. whenever a doubt pops up, think of it as a separate entity. think of it as a dumb bitch karen who's here to irritate you. name it and CUSS the fuck out of it.
"oh we're never going to be able to-" shut up karen. why don't you let the important people handle it
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality✓ Free Actions
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
This is the question that’s always asked & tbh i still struggle with it but you need to understand that you can feel emotions while manifesting. You don’t have to be happy 24/7. Even if you’re crying, you can still keep your thoughts aligned to your manifestation.
“But when i’m having a mental breakdown, i can’t control my thoughts”
It’s okay! you’re human. It’s okay to not control your thoughts once in a while. Only dominant thoughts manifest so if 20% of your thoughts are bad, you’ll still have 80% good ones <3
it’s okay to feel things and to be sad but don’t get stuck there
My main tip is to work on your self concept, confidence & mental health before working on something else.
Reminder: It’s okay to take a break once in a while.
“Can I affirm in my native language?” “Should I affirm in English?” “Can I use the word ‘don’t’ while affirming?” “Can I say ‘not’ while affirming?” “How many times should I affirm?” “Should I affirm 10 times? 100 times? 10,000 times?” “Can I mix languages?” “Should my affirmations be in the present tense, past tense, future tense, or even Jupiter tense?”
Take a deep breath.
Do you see how many rules have been created around something that is supposed to be simple?
The Law of Assumption is called the Law of Assumption, not Examination. It has never cared whether you speak English, Chinese, German, Japanese, Spanish, or any other language, even an extraterrestrial one. It has never asked you to pass an English exam before you can assume something. Language is simply a way for you to communicate with yourself. Your language can also be nothing at all, like silence, while still feeling the state of being. If you want to whisper or affirm, use whatever helps you enter the state of being complete with your desire. Your assumption is what matters, not the language you use to affirm.
One of the biggest fears I see is people worrying about words like “don’t,” “can’t,” or “not.” They become scared that using one “wrong” word will somehow ruin everything. It’s just a word, not a monster or anything scary. If you keep fearing simple words just because other people, or YouTubers with big dramatic thumbnails, tell you “don’t use that,” you are giving the word more power than it deserves. When you understand the Law of Assumption, you understand that your assumption is what creates your experience. You can make your own assumptions and choose what is helpful for you. Maybe other people assume that certain words ruin their state, but that does not mean your state will be ruined. This is your Law of Assumption.
Countless people have countless assumptions, and their thinking and rules may not be your thinking and rules. So make the law useful to you without creating fear and constantly focusing on what you are doing wrong. If you keep doing that, you are consciously choosing misery because you are focusing on failure instead of changing your state and assuming the fulfillment of your desire. Simple.
Think about that for a second. If assumptions are personal, why would one single word have universal power over everyone? The meaning you give your words matters far more than imaginary rules. If a sentence feels natural and helps you accept your desired state, then use it.
The same thing happens with repetition. “How many times should I affirm?” There isn’t a magical number. I already talked about this in one of my past posts, “The Affirmation Fever in the Law of Assumption Community.” You can check that out. The purpose of affirming is not to hit a number. The purpose is to help you settle into your assumption.
Affirmations are just one of many tools designed to help you enter the state of being. Simple. Like many other techniques and methods, affirmations are only a tool. Keep them that way. Don’t create so much pressure around external things. If you practice assuming, which is the real core of the Law, you gradually become so familiar with assumption that you begin to see how much drama is created by the community. I posted a blog called “The Law Was Fine Until We Got Involved.”
I also see people worrying about mixing languages. “Can I affirm in English and then switch to my native language?” Of course you can, if that is how your mind naturally works. Many bilingual and multilingual people think in more than one language every single day without even noticing it. Why would the Law suddenly become confused? The Law is about your assumption, not your vocabulary or strict grammar rules. Assumption is the law. Your assumption. Make assumptions that feel easy and helpful to you. If you think English works best for you, then do it. If you affirm in your native language, then do that. The main goal is to be in the state of being. So focus on and practice the assuming state.
This is why I encourage you to stop collecting affirmation rules from every corner of the internet. Ask yourself a simpler question: Does this assumption feel natural to me? Does it help me embody my desired state? If the answer is yes, then you have already found what works for you.
The Law doesn’t speak English. It doesn’t speak Mexican, Italian, French, or Korean either. It speaks your assumption, the feeling of completeness with your desire. Other people may call it frequency. So stop worrying about perfect wording, perfect grammar, perfect numbers, or perfect techniques. Use the language that feels like home to you. Make your assumptions simple. Make them personal. And most importantly, make them yours. Then practice the assumption.
(long rant, sorry!!) It's crazy that, in order to believe MJ was guilty, you have to either be completely misinformed, or to believe in most insane batshit things. 1: that Michael had time travelling powers to abuse a boy in 1991/1992 inside a train station that didnt exist until 1994, and abuse the same boy on a Disney park in 1988 before it even existed in 1992. 2, that Michael had telepathic abilities to abuse a boy that was thousands and miles away from him on the fucking Grand Canyon with his family. 3, that Michael was simultaneously an evil mastermind genius capable of abusing hundres of boys and grooming billions of fans, and also the most incompetent pedophile in the whole world with no CSAM ever found anywhere, that would want his "former victims" to testify in his trial instead of, ya know, trying to silence them, that protected his nephew Taj when he was molested by another relative, and always keeping the children's family close, safe and well informed about everything they were doing, and even presenting his nephew to Wade and knowing they were dating lol like, where is the grooming/isolating boys from girls??? The families that accused him were the ones chasing him around and shoving their kids into his face. And also that he changes the tactic the alleged abuse/grooming everytime, to every accuser he's a different kind of predator that uses completely different forms of manipulation, all of this while never isolating any kid from their families. He was abusing little boys cuz he's a gay pedophile but hey, suddenly he was into girls as well because an adult woman that needs money is now accusing him LMAO or that it's completely normal for "real victims" to lie every single time, change testimony, rely on editing photos and videos to make their testimony look real, loving and adoring and defending their abusers until they have a financial struggle and suddenly realise oops actually MJ is the worst. Either way, in order to believe MJ was guilty you have to be dumb.
(also: wade robson's mom says in the LN horshit mockumentary that she was happy when Mike died because it means he would never hurt her son or any child anymore!!... but wait... Michael died in 2009... I thought her dumbass son only realized he was abused in 2013...? When did he tell his mom MJ "allegedly abused" him? Because it was not in 2009 lol. These guys are lying clowns. Also racist dehumanizers, MJ was an innocent human being, imagine being happy that he died!)
Correction: James Safechuck alleged he was anally raped hundreds of times in the upstairs loft of the Neverland Ranch Train Station from 1988-1989. He states this happened at the beginning of their “relationship”, not the end.
As we know from county records, the train station was not even approved for build until 1993, and it wasn’t even completed until late 1994. And, furthermore, he couldn’t have been abused inside of it until at least 1995, as Michael was living in NY with his wife Lisa Marie, on the other side of the country.
Which means this is a very real 6 year time discrepancy in his allegations. Of course, this was a huge deal and made headlines, and it wasn’t the estate that found this evidence—it was us, the fans.
Another correction: it wasn’t Wade Robson’s mother that said she was happy when Michael died. It was Stephanie Safechuck, James Safechuck’s mother. But your point still stands, as neither of these men claimed they knew they’d been abused at the time. So her story of dancing when he died makes no sense. Not to mention, both mothers have been caught liking Michael Jackson stuff on the internet since their son’s allegations broke.
Michael was nice enough to offer Stephanie a loan to buy a house with a much lower interest rate than she could have obtained elsewhere. She and her family then proceeded to not pay back the loan, and it wasn’t until I believe 1997 that MJ then eventually forgave their debt.
Stephanie and James also tell another lie in this movie, claiming the theater doors could be locked, which is not true. They are fire doors. There is another lie told by tabloids claiming the glass in the theater rooms was one-way glass, so no one could see them “having sex” inside it?? Yet in Michael’s live tv Oprah interview, we can clearly see the rooms and see that it is not one-way glass. Those rooms were designed to have hospital beds in them so terminally ill children could enjoy the theater like the rest of the kids that came to the ranch.
Also, couldn’t her dumbass just walk around the side to look into the room? Lmao
James spins tales of being abused at every well known area of Neverland Ranch, despite the fact numerous of these locations did not exist at the time of his alleged “honeymoon phase” of 1988-1989. Michael Jackson only secured the deed to the property in April 1988, and construction had not been fully underway until later for quite a lot of the property.
20 Things the Media Will Never Tell You About Michael Jackson's 2005 Trial
The 2005 criminal trial of Michael Jackson was one of the most infamous courtroom spectacles in American history. Cameras were banned inside, tabloids were camped outside, and the world had largely already made up its mind. But what the media often failed to report — and what twelve jurors did absorb after 73 days of testimony — was just how deeply flawed the accusers' case actually was. After deliberating for roughly 32 hours, those jurors came back not guilty on all 14 counts.
"There wasn't a shred of evidence that was able to show us or give us any doubt in voting [not] guilty," one juror told reporters. "It was pretty obvious there was no other way to vote other than not guilty."
So what exactly were they seeing that millions of TV viewers weren't? Here are 20 of the most suspicious, contradictory, or just plain baffling details from the prosecution's case.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Gavin Arvizo is the boy that accused Michael Jackson of abuse. Star Arvizo is that boy's brother. Janet Arvizo is the boys' mother. Michael Jackson met the Arvizos in 2000 after the 10-year-old cancer patient expressed a wish to meet the singer. Later that year, they cut contact. They met again when Martin Bashir requested Gavin Arvizo came on the documentary they were shooting. This was in late 2002 and early 2003. Bashir deceptively edited this interview, bringing Jackson under intense media scrutiny. This caused District Attorney Tom Sneddon to begin his investigation.
1. The Molestation Allegedly Happened at the Worst Possible Moment
The prosecution's own timeline stated that the alleged abuse occurred after the February 2003 broadcast of Martin Bashir's documentary Living with Michael Jackson — the very moment when Jackson was under more public scrutiny than at any point in his career. Defense attorney Thomas Mesereau hammered this point relentlessly: prosecutors were asking jurors to believe that Jackson, knowing the world was watching him, chose that moment specifically to begin molesting a child he'd already known for years. Jurors cited this timeline problem as one of their central reasons for acquitting. Jackson, painted as a calculated, cunning man who had kept the family in captivity, had chosen to strike while the eyes of the world were fixed on him. It simply didn't make logical sense.
2. The "Kidnapping" Conspiracy Charges Were Demolished by Receipts
The prosecution charged Jackson with conspiracy to hold the Arvizo family captive at Neverland Ranch. The theory was that after the documentary aired, Jackson's team imprisoned the family to keep them from speaking out. But here's the problem: during the weeks the family was supposedly being held against their will, records showed they were out on all-expenses-paid shopping sprees and spa treatments. According to BBC News, "one of the logs shows the entire family left the ranch and returned several hours later." The defense also pointed out that Janet Arvizo told the jury she had tried to escape by taking the family to an orthodontist — a trip that Jackson's team apparently just… let them go on.
Then, the defense called the family's orthodontist, Dr. Seamount, to the stand. Dr. Seamount testified that Janet Arvizo made absolutely no attempt to ask for help, seek refuge, or mention that she was being restrained during the dental visit. The conspiracy charge had thoroughly backfired due to the family's own behavior.
3. A Key Adult Magazine Didn't Exist Yet When the Arvizos Were at Neverland
The Arvizo brothers testified that Jackson had shown them pornographic magazines during their time at Neverland Ranch. During cross-examination, Star Arvizo was shown a copy of a specific adult magazine and repeatedly confirmed that it was the exact one Jackson had shown him and Gavin. There was just one small issue: the Arvizos had not visited Neverland since March 2003, and the magazine Star identified was dated August 2003, five months after they had last been there. It was not possible for Star Arvizo's claims to be true.
4. Janet Arvizo Admitted on the Stand That She Had Lied Under Oath Before — It Was a Dry Run for the Jackson Allegations
The mother of the accuser — the person whose testimony was the backbone of the charges — openly admitted during cross-examination that she had previously lied under oath in a prior sexual abuse lawsuit. Under California jury instructions, a witness "who is willfully false in one material part of his or her testimony is to be distrusted in others." Defense attorney Robert Sanger stated bluntly: "This is not because she's a battered woman. It's because she lies for gain."
The lawsuit she lied in was itself damning. In 1998, after a shoplifting incident at a J.C. Penney, the Arvizo family claimed that store security guards had beaten and sexually assaulted Janet. The specific lie Janet had told to win that case was attributing bruises caused by her then-husband to the J.C. Penney security guards instead. And critically, no claim of sexual assault appeared in their initial July 1999 legal filing — it was only added a year later when the complaint was amended. The original police report showed no evidence of injuries. The Arvizos ultimately received a $152,000 settlement. Thomas Mesereau argued to the jury that this was a pattern — the Arvizos had learned to manufacture sexual abuse allegations to extract money from institutions. The structural similarity between the J.C. Penney case and the Jackson case is impossible to dismiss. The woman had a proclivity to lie for gain.
5. Janet Arvizo Was Later Charged With Welfare Fraud — Right After the Trial
Just two months after Jackson was acquitted, Janet Arvizo was charged with five counts of welfare fraud and perjury by Los Angeles County. The charges stemmed from her fraudulently collecting about $18,782 in government benefits while failing to disclose that she had a $152,000 settlement sitting in her bank account from the J.C. Penney lawsuit. She pleaded no contest and agreed to pay over $8,600 in restitution. This information was not fully presented to the jury because Janet invoked her Fifth Amendment right to avoid self-incrimination during trial — which itself is a notable move for a prosecution witness. When the woman whose testimony was meant to establish that Jackson was holding her family hostage refuses to testify about her own actions for fear of criminal prosecution, there's a glaring credibility problem.
6. Janet Arvizo's Testimony Was Such a Disaster That Prosecutors Began Objecting to Their Own Witness
If the factual contradictions in Janet Arvizo's testimony weren't damaging enough, her five days on the stand produced something almost unprecedented: by the end of her testimony, prosecutors were objecting to their own witness. According to CNN News, Janet was so far off-script and so damaging for the prosecutors' case that her own legal team began trying to shut down what she was saying mid-testimony. The New York Times described her performance as "rambling, incoherent, and at times combative." She ignored courtroom protocol, always turning to face the jury directly when answering questions rather than addressing the attorneys. She cried, argued, and at various points scolded the people in the room.
One juror later said she believed Janet was a scam artist. Another juror — Juror No. 5 — described the single moment that crystallized everything: "I disliked it intensely when she snapped her fingers at us. That's when I thought, 'Don't snap your fingers at me, lady.'" The jury foreman Paul Rodriguez later compared Janet's emotionally erratic behavior directly to Jason Francia's credibility problems as two of the biggest reasons the prosecution's witnesses failed. In a trial already short on evidence, the prosecution's star witness managed to actively alienate the people who were supposed to believe her.
7. The Arvizos Had A History of Targeting Celebrities For Money
One of the more quietly devastating stretches of the defense case came when Jay Leno, Chris Tucker, and George Lopez all took the stand and described their experiences with the Arvizo family. The picture that emerged was consistent across three entirely independent, credible witnesses: a family that used Gavin's cancer diagnosis as emotional leverage to extract money and favors from celebrities, and whose behavior ranged from strange to openly aggressive.
Jay Leno testified that he began receiving voicemail messages from Gavin, then a ten-year-old cancer patient, as part of his practice of making calls to sick children. But something felt off. Leno said Gavin sounded "very adult" and "scripted" — not like a child calling his hero, but like someone following a playbook. Gavin repeatedly called Leno "his hero," which Leno said struck him as strange. He eventually had to ask a mutual acquaintance to get Gavin to stop calling altogether.
George Lopez's testimony was arguably even more damning. Lopez gave money and gifts to the family after being told they had no health insurance and desperately needed financial help for Gavin's treatment. But that claim was false — the family had good health insurance that covered all of Gavin's medical costs. The situation deteriorated when the Arvizos accused Lopez of stealing $300 from Gavin's wallet. Lopez testified that when the father asked what he should tell his son, Lopez responded: "Tell him his father's an extortionist." Lopez cut ties with the family entirely.
Chris Tucker, the defense's final witness, confirmed he too had given money and gifts to the Arvizos out of sympathy. But he told the jury the family had taken advantage of him — calling him their "brother" and expecting far more than he was willing to give. He said he had even warned Michael Jackson about the family directly, describing them to Jackson as "cunning." And Tucker's then-girlfriend, Azja Pryor, added a crucial detail: she testified that Janet Arvizo had been excited about the family's planned trip to Brazil — the very trip that prosecutors claimed Jackson's team was plotting as a forced deportation scheme to silence them. Three celebrities, zero corroboration for the prosecution's narrative.
8. The Alarm System Contradiction Caught Star in a Logical Trap
The prosecution argued that Jackson had a bedroom alarm system specifically designed to alert him when anyone approached, implying he used it to create privacy for abuse. Star corroborated this theory. But Mesereau pointed out the obvious: if the alarm reliably notified Jackson whenever anyone approached his bedroom, how exactly did Star sneak in twice to witness the alleged abuse? Star's explanation — that the stairway door being shut muffled the sound — was then directly tested by the defense, who filmed a demonstration at Neverland Ranch showing the alarm was clearly audible even with the door closed. The witness's story was factually disproved.
9. Star Also Had a Prior Sworn Statement Directly Contradict His Trial Testimony
During cross-examination, Mesereau confronted Star about a 2000 sworn statement he had made in connection with the J.C. Penney case in which he said his "mother and father never fought." At the Jackson trial, the family's central narrative was that David Arvizo had physically abused Janet and the children for 17 years. Star admitted on the stand that he had lied in that earlier sworn statement. Two major prosecution witnesses had admitted to perjury in prior lawsuits.
10. The Los Angeles Department of Child and Family Services Had Already Investigated — and Cleared Jackson
Before prosecutors ever indicted Jackson, California's own child welfare authorities conducted an investigation. From February 14 to February 27, 2003 — just weeks after the documentary aired — the Los Angeles Department of Child and Family Services interviewed the Arvizo family and investigated the allegations. Their confidential report, which later leaked to the media, concluded that accusations of illicit conduct were "unfounded." This is the state's own child protective agency, talking to the very family who would later become the prosecution's star witnesses, finding nothing credible enough to warrant action. District Attorney Tom Sneddon went forward anyway.
11. The FBI Investigated Jackson for Over a Decade and Found Nothing
The FBI's involvement with Michael Jackson began in 1992 and continued through 2005. 16 hard drives were seized and thoroughly searched. Over 600 pages of Bureau files were eventually compiled — 351 of which were released publicly under the Freedom of Information Act. Their conclusion? The FBI "found no evidence of criminal conduct on Jackson's part." After a decade of active investigation, with access to resources and capabilities far beyond local law enforcement, the FBI came up empty. Jackson's attorney Brian Oxman put it simply: "In all these pages, hundreds of pages, many many hours of investigations... there's not one scrap of evidence that Michael Jackson ever did anything wrong, committed any crime."
12. The Prosecution Had No Physical Evidence
Despite presenting approximately 700 exhibits and calling around 90 witnesses over 73 days, the prosecution had zero physical forensic evidence linking Jackson to any crime. No DNA, no medical findings corroborating abuse, nothing. And so, the prosecution based its case solely on testimony. The jury specifically said afterward that they "expected probably better evidence, something that was a little more convincing. And it just wasn't there."
13. The Prosecution Called Jackson's Ex-Wife to the Stand — And She Helped the Defense
In late April 2005, the prosecution called Debbie Rowe — Jackson's former wife and mother of two of his children — to the witness stand. Their strategy was specific. They believed Rowe would corroborate Janet Arvizo's claim that Jackson coerced people around him into making positive statements about him on video.
It did not go that way.
Instead of supporting the prosecution's narrative, Rowe was openly supportive of Jackson. She described his inner circle of business associates — Marc Schaffel, Dieter Wiesner, and Ronald Konitzer — as "opportunistic vultures" who were exploiting him. Her testimony helped the defense, not the prosecution. The situation deteriorated so badly for the prosecution's side that they actually moved to have Rowe dismissed mid-testimony — an almost unheard-of maneuver — claiming she was not providing the testimony they expected. Judge Melville refused and let her testimony stand. In a trial already full of prosecution witnesses who either crumbled under cross-examination or accidentally helped the defense, Debbie Rowe was arguably the most spectacular backfire of all — a witness the prosecution had subpoenaed and prepared, who walked out of the courtroom having done more damage to their case than to Jackson's.
14. Multiple Other Child Guests at Neverland Testified Nothing Improper Ever Happened
Macaulay Culkin, who had slept in Jackson's bedroom between the ages of 10 and 14 on numerous occasions, testified under oath that he never experienced or witnessed any inappropriate behavior. He called the allegations "absolutely ridiculous." Brett Barnes testified that he had stayed at Neverland Ranch and shared Jackson's two-story bedroom on multiple occasions, but insisted that Jackson never touched him inappropriately or did anything improper. Wade Robson, who had slept at Neverland Ranch more than 20 times as a child, testified (in 2005) that Jackson had never touched him. These were not fringe figures; they were people who had been closest to Jackson's world with the kind of access that would have made them potential victims if the prosecution's "pattern of behavior" theory was true.
15. The Prosecution's "Prior Bad Acts" Witnesses Had Financial Incentives to Cooperate
Former Neverland employee Jason Francia testified that Jackson had touched him inappropriately. But Mesereau established that Francia's mother, former housekeeper Blanca Francia, had sold her story to the tabloid show Hard Copy for money, and that both Francias had received compensation for media interviews. Notably, Jason Francia had told detectives in his very first 1993 interview that Jackson had not molested him. He later changed that account. Under cross-examination, Jason left what the jury foreman described as "too many little loopholes in his statements."
16. Former Security Guard Ralph Chacon's Testimony Was Not Impartial
In April 2005, former Neverland security guard Ralph Chacon testified that he had personally witnessed Jackson performing sex acts on Jordan Chandler in the early 1990s — the kind of eyewitness testimony that, if true, would have been explosive. What the prosecution glossed over was that Chacon was among a group of former employees who had previously sued Michael Jackson and lost. The defense argued these witnesses had deep financial and personal grudges against Jackson — making their dramatic, previously-unmentioned eyewitness claims conveniently timed and highly suspect.
17. Two Separate Grand Juries in 1993 Did Not Indict Jackson
When the 1993 Chandler allegations first emerged, DA Tom Sneddon presented evidence to not one but two separate grand juries. Neither returned an indictment. The criminal case was effectively dropped. It was only after Jackson settled the civil suit — something his own insurance company had the contractual right to do without Jackson's consent — that prosecutors and the media began treating the settlement as evidence of guilt. It was not. California law explicitly bars civil settlements from being used as evidence of guilt in criminal proceedings, and two different grand juries had already decided the underlying evidence was insufficient.
18. Tom Sneddon — The Prosecutor — Had Spent Over a Decade Trying to Put Jackson Behind Bars
Santa Barbara District Attorney Tom Sneddon led the prosecution in 2005. He had also led the investigation against Jackson in 1993. When that case fell apart, Jackson publicly mocked Sneddon in a song called "D.S." on his HIStory album. The defense moved to have Sneddon disqualified from the 2005 case, citing personal bias — and while that motion was denied, the concern was legitimate. Defense attorneys painted Sneddon as a man with a "personal vendetta." Sneddon called Chris Tucker, an African-American defense witness, "boy". After the acquittal, Sneddon made the jaw-dropping public statement that any other defendant "would have been convicted in less than two hours" — suggesting the jury was starstruck, rather than acknowledging any weakness in his own case. It's a remarkable thing for a prosecutor to say after a 73-day trial.
19. The Jury Went In Majority Not-Guilty on the Very First Vote
This may be the most understated fact of the entire trial. After 73 days of testimony — after the jury heard everything the prosecution had to offer — the very first informal vote among the 12 jurors was 9 to 3 in favor of acquittal. That means three-quarters of the jury, after absorbing months of witness testimony and 700 exhibits, came in already leaning toward not guilty. The three holdouts were eventually persuaded during deliberations. This was not a close call that went Jackson's way; it was a case in which the jury looked at the prosecution's evidence and found it wanting almost immediately.
20. Michael Jackson's Criminal Case Was One of the Weakest Ever Brought to Trial
The prosecution brought 10 original charges — later expanded to 14 — against the most famous entertainer on the planet, based almost entirely on the word of a family with a documented history of fraud, perjury, and fabricating abuse allegations for financial gain. Their star witness, the accuser's mother, had already admitted to lying under oath in a prior civil case, would later plead no contest to welfare fraud, and invoked the Fifth Amendment to avoid incriminating herself on the stand. Their supporting witnesses included a former employee who had previously lost a lawsuit against Jackson, and a key eyewitness who identified an adult magazine that hadn't existed yet.
The alleged conspiracy charge — kidnapping a family at Neverland — was obliterated by the family's own voluntary comings and goings. The FBI, after more than a decade of active investigation across hundreds of pages of files, found zero evidence of any criminal conduct. California's own child welfare authorities had already cleared Jackson in a preliminary investigation before the indictment. And despite 73 days of trial, roughly 90 prosecution witnesses, and nearly 700 exhibits, not a single piece of physical forensic evidence tied Jackson to any crime. Compare that to virtually any other high-profile conviction and the contrast is stark. When the jury took its very first informal vote after all of that, nine of twelve jurors were already ready to acquit. The three holdouts didn't last long. In the end, the verdict wasn't close. It wasn't controversial inside the room. It was, by any objective measure, a prosecution that never had the goods.
The Takeaway
Andrew Cohen, a legal analyst for CBS, wrote, "You had to see the parade of witnesses, so many of them sleazy or creepy or just downright odd, who paraded in front of jurors for three long months.
You had to see what a punk the alleged victim seemed like on the witness stand and how shaky the core of his testimony was. You had to see how delusional his mother seemed and how much her testimony lacked in credibility. You had to see how futilely prosecutors tried to convince jurors that it is a crime for a famous person, a target, to undertake good public relations or swift damage control. You had to see the evidence that piled up to prove the accusing family had a history of setting up and then hitting celebrities for payoffs.
You had to see how defense attorneys ran rings around prosecutors. You had to count how many times prosecution witnesses testified to facts that helped Jackson. You had to note how often both prosecution and defense witnesses told jurors that they had not been interviewed by law enforcement officials prior to the start of the case.
And you had to notice how intently jurors were watching and listening to lead defense attorney Thomas Mesereau when he delivered his closing argument last week.
...
A jury acquitted Jackson of molestation because the evidence simply wasn't strong enough to support the felony convictions sought by prosecutors. He was acquitted because the witnesses against him were among the worst I have ever seen in a court."
What you have just read — the magazine that didn't exist yet, the mother who invoked the Fifth Amendment at her own side's trial, the three famous comedians who took the stand and described a family running a long con, the child welfare report that cleared Jackson before the ink was dry on the indictment — almost none of it reached the public in real time. While the trial was happening, television networks ran nightly segments built almost entirely around the prosecution's graphic, shocking allegations. Anchors delivered breathless monologues about alcohol and molestation and secret bedrooms. The defense's systematic dismantling of those same allegations — the timeline impossibilities, the magazine date, the lies under oath, Janet's devious history — was either buried in the final two minutes of a segment or skipped entirely. As media critic Charles Thomson later wrote, the coverage was "one of the most shameful episodes in journalistic history." Reporters dashed out of the courtroom to be first on air and missed entire stretches — at one point, even two weeks' worth — of testimony that gutted the prosecution's case. The story that sold was Michael Jackson the predator. The story that happened in that courtroom was something else entirely.
And the consequences of that failure are still with us. Millions of people who never thoroughly sat through a single day of that trial — who never heard Macaulay Culkin call the allegations "absolutely ridiculous" under oath, never learned that Star Arvizo identified a magazine that hadn't been printed yet, never saw Janet Arvizo admit to lying in a previous sexual abuse lawsuit — walked away from 2005 certain of Jackson's guilt. The verdict was treated by much of the press not as a legal outcome supported by the evidence, but as a celebrity getting away with something. In reality, nine of twelve jurors walked into deliberations already leaning toward acquittal. The case wasn't close. It completely collapsed. But that's not the version of history most people carry, because the media that got it wrong in 2005 never went back to correct the record.
And so...
"If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it."
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality✓ Free Actions
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
The "Thought Replacement" Method That Stops Spiraling Fast
First Things First... Stop Fighting Your Brain Can I tell you something that completely changed the way I approached manifestation? You are not failing because you have negative thoughts. You're struggling because you're giving those thoughts a permanent seat at the table.
I used to think I had to eliminate every negative thought before I could manifest anything. If I caught myself thinking, "What if they never come back?" I'd panic. Then I'd panic because I panicked. Then I'd affirm harder. Then I'd wonder if I was affirming correctly. It was honestly exhausting.
Looking back, I wasn't manifesting my SP. I was manifesting a headache. The truth is, your brain was never designed to produce only positive thoughts. It was designed to keep you alive. And sometimes, unfortunately, it thinks an unanswered text message is a life-threatening event.
Your Brain Loves Shortcuts
One of the most fascinating things about the brain is that it's incredibly efficient. It doesn't want to create brand-new thoughts every time something happens. Instead, it relies on existing neural pathways. These are networks of neurons that have become stronger through repetition.
Think of it like walking through a forest. The first time you walk somewhere, it's difficult because you're pushing through bushes and branches. But if you walk that same route every single day, eventually a clear path forms. The next time you need to get somewhere, your brain naturally chooses the easier path.
Your thoughts work exactly the same way. If you've spent years thinking: "I'm always rejected." "Nothing ever works out for me." "I always get left." Those pathways become well-paved highways. Your brain isn't choosing them because they're true. It's choosing them because they're familiar.
Why Spirals Happen So Quickly
Have you ever noticed how one tiny thing can suddenly turn into a full mental disaster movie? Your SP takes longer than usual to reply. Five minutes later you've somehow convinced yourself they're losing feelings. Ten minutes later you've imagined them meeting someone else.
Twenty minutes later you've planned your emotional recovery, adopted three cats, and moved to another country. How did we get here Psychologists call this catastrophizing. Catastrophizing is a cognitive distortion where the brain automatically jumps to the worst possible outcome without sufficient evidence.
Why? Because uncertainty makes the brain uncomfortable. And your brain would rather predict a negative outcome than admit it simply doesn't know what's happening. It's trying to protect you. It's just not very good at it.
So... What Is Thought Replacement?
Thought replacement isn't pretending your negative thoughts don't exist. It isn't forcing yourself to "be positive." And it definitely isn't arguing with every anxious thought your brain throws at you.
Thought replacement is intentionally interrupting an old mental pathway before it becomes a full spiral and gently directing your attention toward the identity you're trying to build instead.
Notice I said identity. Identity. Because manifestation isn't about convincing yourself of one perfect outcome. It's about becoming someone whose default assumptions are different.
Here's How It Actually Works
Let's say your brain says: "They haven't texted me because they're losing interest." Instead of following that thought for the next thirty minutes, pause. Ask yourself: "What identity is this thought coming from?" Usually the answer is something like: "The version of me that believes they're always abandoned." Now replace the identity, not just the sentence.
You could choose: "I'm someone who's consistently loved and prioritized." Or: "Our relationship is secure." Notice how different that feels. You're not trying to win an argument with your brain. You're teaching it a new direction.
Why This Works From a Neuroscience Perspective
Every time you interrupt an old thought pattern and return to a new assumption, you're doing something incredible. You're weakening one neural pathway while strengthening another. This process is possible because of neuroplasticity, which is the brain's ability to reorganize itself based on repeated experiences and repeated thoughts.
Think of your attention like water. Wherever it flows repeatedly, things grow. If every stressful situation waters the same old belief, that belief becomes stronger. If you consistently redirect your attention toward a healthier assumption, eventually that pathway becomes the one your brain reaches for automatically.
Just a brain doing what brains naturally do.
Let's Use a Real Example
Imagine you're manifesting money. You open your banking app and immediately think: "I'll never have enough." That thought has probably been repeated hundreds of times. Instead of accepting it as fact, interrupt it. Replace it with: "I'm becoming someone who always finds solutions." Or: "Money consistently supports me." Notice something important. The replacement doesn't have to feel emotionally exciting.
It just has to be repeated. The brain changes through repetition far more than occasional bursts of motivation. The same thing applies to an SP.
Instead of: "They're pulling away." Practice: "Our relationship is becoming stronger every day." Not because the 3D proved it. Because that's the identity you're conditioning your brain to recognize as normal.
A Little Secret Nobody Talks About
Thought replacement isn't about never spiraling again. It's about recovering faster. That's real progress. Months ago you may have spiraled for three days. Now maybe it's thirty minutes. Later it'll be five minutes. Eventually you'll catch yourself halfway through the first anxious thought and think, "Nice try, brain." That's growth.
One last thing before I go. Please stop expecting your brain to transform overnight. You've probably spent years rehearsing certain beliefs. Give yourself permission to build new ones the same way, through patience, consistency, and repetition.
The beautiful part is that your brain is changing every single day, whether you're aware of it or not. Why not give it something better to practice?
And if you'd like someone to help you identify your old patterns, create affirmations that actually target your root beliefs, and build a self-concept that feels natural instead of forced, I'd love to help. My 1:1 coaching and guides combines the Law of Assumption with neuroscience and psychology so you understand why each technique works, not just what to do.
You can message me here or on Instagram if you'd like to know more about coaching or current availability. I'd love to help you stop fighting your mind and start training it instead.
here’s pieces of advice in no particular order, packed into one post. some of you might’ve noticed a gap between this and my last post, and i just have one sentence to explain myself;
i manifested a shit ton of my desires.
to keep it short (not really, LMFAO): desired face changes, body changes, literally a new fucking family and escaping my abusive household + my new family house is exactly as i drew it, money, changing specific things about my school, meeting desired people, helping my partner financially, physically and mentally, material items (skincare, makeup, merch, electric guitar and drums, new clothing, laptop and new headphones, an entire room with a WALK IN CLOSET.), exact scenarios playing out how i wanted and so much more! i’ve been too busy experiencing all that and forgot about this blog.
— tell people about your desires as if they’re happening and / or already happened. seriously, what’s stopping you from doing that? since it’s already real, already materialized, why don’t you tell people about it? it doesn’t have to be family or friends, it could be strangers. if you think about it, they’re technically “manifesting” for you.
— TALK TO YOURSELF. build up your self concept. whatever time you have alone, instead of scrolling through reels or tiktok, just talk to yourself in the perspective of the you who has gotten their desire. make whatever scenarios you want, aswell. act as if you’re talking to a friend; and if you can, talk to your actual friends about it. mutuals, online, irl, whoever wants to help you with your manifestations, speak to them as if you have your desire. imo, this is a way better option of feeling the wish fulfilled. the rant doesn’t even have to make sense or be perfect either.
— similar to the last one, act as you would if you had your desires. AND I KNOOOW! before you throw your rotten tomatoes, i know this tip has been said many times but the issue is many of you give up due to it feeling “fake” or that you’re just lying to yourself, that’s NORMAL. that does not mean you haven’t manifested anything. imagine it like this—you’ve spent almost your entire life in a pool (believing in the 3D and believing in the fact your desires haven’t manifested), and now, you’ve gotten out of the pool and stood on the concrete. you’re not immediately dry, your ego, your mind, everything has remnants of doubt left. the killer of any method and tip is perfection. you do not have to perfectly believe in it, just stay consistent. start basic and go deeper. if you had your SP, what date spots would you suggest to them? if you had the money, how would you deal with it responsibly beyond receiving it and buying what you want? if you had the desired body and face, what makeup style or fashion choices would suit you best?
— you do not have to ignore the 3D. realize that you can feel unpleasant, angry or upset at the 3D and simultaneously have your desire. every time you “waver” or have a reaction, that isn’t a failure. your mindset didn’t get shot in the heart. rather, you get two choices.. do you let this echo take control over you, or do you grab it by it’s throat and tell it you’re still the one in charge?
— “logic” is manifestation. “unrealistic” is manifestation. “linear thinking” is manifestation. that is all something you’ve conditioned yourself to believe and actively manifest, ask yourself, what makes your doubts true? when you feel that whisper, those cold fingers gripping onto your shoulders, you believe them without any proof. do you know what that’s called? MANIFESTATION. and if you have any physical proof beyond a “feeling” or “logic”, then THAT STILL DOESNT MEAN JACK SHIT. you’re still in control. you can still manifest. you are a limitless being limiting yourself.
— literally interrupt your doubts. for me, i just scream “CANCEL TALK!” like twice or thrice and go on with my day.
that’s all that comes to mind, though i swear i had more. ANYWAYS!!! if the post is wonky, be it wording or tags or whatever the fuck, don’t mind it. i’m on web because i have the app deleted and i can’t be arsed to redownload..
while we’re on that, last tip, STOP OVERCONSUMING EVERYTHING. manifestation / shifting is so unbelievably complex and mysterious which guarentees everyone to have a different view, opinion, perspective. that’s natural. and though everyone’s way of manifesting and shifting is valid, you are harming yourself by consuming every single contradicting view. it ends up in confusing, inconsistency, lack of critical thinking and lack of YOU thinking for YOURSELF. you don’t explode if you scroll past a video regurgitating the same views you’ve heard before, it just ends up in you saying “oh, makes sense! i’ll apply this!” then trying it, letting the 3D / ego / doubts have power over you OR forgetting about it until the cycle repeats. BREAK THE CYCLE.
anyways, time for me to disappear again and enjoy my desires until i miss you guys.. mmmwah mwah !
kaledo-art
yousharknotpass
areudirty
annaxmalina
dailybridgerton
turnnoffyourmind
gummygunk
