Untitled

The sobering finding of an adoption study. We need to walk away from magical thinking and genetic fallacies, for example, the fallacy that biological parents automatically make better parents than adoptive parents. Another one is the fallacy that a woman automatically makes a better parent than a man. Once we liberate ourselves from these fallacies we can think more clearly. Once the dust settles, we can see that the critical question we should ask ourselves is do we want our society’s children to be raised by only one parent or two? Clearly, the optimal arrangement is 2 parents, a man and a woman. Longitudinal studies show that the biological children of two parent homes have better career and educational outcomes and commit less dysfunctional and criminal behaviour than the biological children of one parent homes. In short, they become more productive citizens who more often contribute wealth to society rather than be a drain to it. Read more: https://paulcarr.wordpress.com/2017/10/23/my-thoughts-on-paternal-surrenderpaternal-abortion/#adoption #magicthinking #geneticfallacy #biologicalparents #adoptiveparents #longitudinalstudies #williambradfordwilcox #nicholaszill #instituteforfamilystudies #USDepartmentofeducation #2parenthomes #singleparenthomes #physicalhealthimpairments #psychologicalimpairments #academicattainment #attachmentissues #emotionalattainment #positivelaw #monogamousmarriage #monogamy https://www.instagram.com/p/B5sdFrAB3VJ/?igshid=1ipc7ybqwsqyj

Both men and women want to be good parents. In the United States, in the modern era, a worryingly high percentage (24%) of fathers are living apart from some or all of their children according to a Pew Research Center analysis of 2011 to 2015 data from the National Survey of Family Growth . There appears to be a mismatch between what fathers want, which is to be with their children more, and what the reality for many of them is. A Pew Research survey from 2010 and 2011 found that 94% of women and 91% of men, aged 18 to 64, said that being a good parent was one of the most important things or very important in their lives. These are very similar results. Read more: https://paulcarr.wordpress.com/2017/10/23/my-thoughts-on-paternal-surrenderpaternal-abortion/#goodparents #pewresearchcenter #naturalsurveyoffamilygrowth #fathers #mothers #parenthood #paidwork #housework #childcare #nationalfatherhoodinitiative #equalitybeforethelaw #babymoseslaws #babymoseslaw #fertilitylevel #reproductivefreedom #globalism #naturaljustice #naturaljusticemeasures #bestinterestofthechild #monogamy #monogamousmarriage https://www.instagram.com/p/B5saLL5BKIk/?igshid=1cek3l5rct7n5

Gynocentrism versus misandry. When the Titanic sank in 1912, a higher percentage of women in third class were saved (46% or 67 out of 165 onboard) than men in first class (32.5% or 57 out of 175 onboard). In the face of crisis, men on the sinking Titanic allowed the women and children to be prioritized to be saved by the limited number of lifeboats. This I would characterize as gynocentrism. When human societies, especially small societies, are subject to great stress, when survival becomes the priority, gynocentrism becomes apparent. It is biologically hardwired and cannot be eliminated by means of culture or law. Read more: https://paulcarr.wordpress.com/2017/10/23/my-thoughts-on-paternal-surrenderpaternal-abortion/#gynocentrismversusmisandry #gynocentrism #misandry #sexualreproduction #anisogamy #gametes #titanic #demonizationofmen #FGM #femalegenitalmutilation #malecircumcision #USCongress #CDC #Centerfordiseasecontrol #genitalintegrity #humanrights #foreskin #circumcision #childrensrights https://www.instagram.com/p/B5sYeQ5BqgR/?igshid=13p1hn0js6ghj

Legal monogamy will prevent the transformation of gynocentrism into misandry. I propose that we remove marriage custom from the honour bound system of tradition and duty and subject it to clear and precise positive law that is aligned with the principles of natural justice. In other words, we update the institution of (monogamous) marriage from a cultural one into a legal one. Both men and women should be free to decide for themselves if they wish to parent. Currently, because of cultural expectations, only women have this privilege which, in fact, should be a human right, grounded in legal statute, enjoyed by both men and women. This apparent cultural bias against men, which we can call gynocentrism, is, in fact, rooted in evolutionary biology. It is ultimately a biological bias that manifests nowadays as a cultural bias. Read more: https://paulcarr.wordpress.com/2017/10/23/my-thoughts-on-paternal-surrenderpaternal-abortion/#gynocentrism #marriage #marriagecustom #monogamy #monogamousmarriage #misandry #gynocentrism #dnatest #europeanconventiononhumanrights #ECHR #roybaumeister #americanpsychologicalassociation #WAW #womenarewonderfuleffect #likeabilityofmen #likeabilityofwomen #juliancastro #transmen #transwomen #legalmonogamy #toxicity #toxicityofmisandry https://www.instagram.com/p/B5sXVR4hFwc/?igshid=1ahluh2uscsw9

Introduction. In this article, I make my case for applying clear and precise positive law, in alignment with the principles of natural justice, to the hitherto honour bound custom of monogamous marriage. I propose that we transform the cultural institution of marriage into a legal institution. I think a big factor behind the success of western civilization from the 14th century onwards has been the practice of the custom of monogamous marriage. Since the 1960s, the sexual liberation of women (something I welcome), as a result of the availability of the abortion pill, abortion and the removal of social sanctions against women who have had children out of wedlock, has negatively impacted upon the popularity of marriage. Fewer people marry. The marriage rate in the United States, for example, has never been lower today than since records began – less for 7 per 1000 people every year since 2009. It’s even worse in all other OECD countries, with the exception of Turkey and Lithuania. In my country, the Republic of Ireland, the marriage rate fell to 4.8 marriages per 1000 population in 2016, the same as the OECD average that year. It fell further to 4.6 marriages per 1000 population in 2017 and 4.3 marriages per 1000 in 2018, the lowest it has ever been with the exception of 1995 and 2011. It is projected to fall further to 4 marriages per 1000 population by 2030. As recently as 1980, it was 6.41 marriages per 1000 population and had peaked at 7.42 marriages per 1000 population in 1973. Read more: https://paulcarr.wordpress.com/2017/10/23/my-thoughts-on-paternal-surrenderpaternal-abortion/#introduction #monogamy #monogamousmarriage #marriage #sexualrevolution #OECD #sexualliberationofwomen #westerncivilization #marriagerate #childrenperwoman #fertilitylevel #familylaw #mandatorydnatest #abortiononrequest #abortion #paternalabortion #paternalsurrender #ministryforadoption #departmentforadoption #mandatoryjointcustody #nativepopulation #smallgovernment https://www.instagram.com/p/B5sMj9WhZeB/?igshid=1ukm0esus2k8f