Jules of Nature

Love Begins
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open

祝日 / Permanent Vacation
todays bird

tannertan36
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me

Andulka

Janaina Medeiros
DEAR READER
Show & Tell

blake kathryn
ojovivo
Sade Olutola

pixel skylines
art blog(derogatory)

JVL

oozey mess
will byers stan first human second
seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from Germany

seen from United States

seen from Greece

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Brazil

seen from Ireland
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Australia
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Singapore
seen from Ukraine
seen from Brazil
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Germany
@website-enjoyer

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
the apartment is fucking flooding again
hoxhaist mutual acquiredddd 😁
You do not need to see the failure of previous socialist movements as failures of socialism and Marxism. Marx did not become a nihilist due to the failure of the Paris Commune; he sought to analyze its failures and continued in the goal of revolution and the liberation of the proletariat using this failure as a stepping stone to learn and better our fight against capitalism. If you cannot maintain your beliefs in the face of previous failures and have to resort to revisionism, you aren't actually committed to Marxism.
You can perfectly analyze the failures of Cuba, USSR, China, and other socialist projects and what caused them to fail. To just close your eyes and plug your ears and say that actually socialism is winning and there is no need for analysis of these alleged socialist projects is anti-Marxist. China is currently the 2nd largest supporter of Israel economically. Cuba and the DPRK are dominated by foreign capital and are reliant upon it. Cuba even opened up its economy to private ownership by US citizens over a decade ago! The DPRK is sending soldiers to aid Russia's Inter-Imperialist war in Ukraine! For gods sakes you can and I know you can understand these as unacceptable for any socialist country to do. Look past these states and look towards seeking to organize revolution within your own country, stop glorifying and upholding these nations which have obviously failed to meet the standards which we should hold them to. Analyze these nations seek to understand their failures to move past them, join a communist party, organize your community, educate others and yourself.
Is revisionism the greatest symptom of this historical defeat of communism when Marxism has become an incredibly marginal doctrine? What could orthodox Marxism mean in a time when, in the West at least, class struggles have become more common around rent, debt, and citizenship than in the sphere of production? When they have become more fragmented and atomized unlike the mass struggles of an era where the organization of the factory system allowed industrial class struggle unionism to become a reality for thousands of people? I think that the crisis we've experienced is far more fundamental than the collapse of the Marxist-Leninism of the Comintern, which was always an unsteady coalition from the start (do we mean the Marxism and Leninism of Zinoviev, Trotsky, Stalin, Lukács, or Bordiga?) and quickly fragmented into multiple factions after World War II. We are now back to the very basic issues of socialism itself as something that emerged as a mass movement from democratic revolutions. We're at the question of how we can even have mass politics in a world that has been designed from top to bottom to prevent or recuperate them.
I agree with your objections to the state of "actually existing socialism" in the 21st century, it poses no ready made alternative to us, but at the same time the Marxist tradition itself is now a dinosaur. If we were to make the contributions of Marx or Lenin to history a living reality for ourselves, I think we need to work past this baggage and think originally about the concrete conditions of our concrete conjuncture and develop concepts to meet the needs of the moment. This doesn't have to mean reformism (imo, the more appropriate target of criticism when people criticize revision in general) and I think it's in fact essential for demonstrating the strategic emptiness and deluded utopianism of reformism today. You are right that people need to focus on the realities of the world around them, but I think today this means starting all over again. We are constructing the communist movement from the ground up, and we're going to have to start from the various partial and democratic struggles today (immigrant rights, police/prison abolition, indigenism, feminism, queer politics, etc) if we want to ever reach the point of a politically independent proletariat and communist party.
I may be misreading but I am not a Orthadox Marxist?
I agree that the communist movement must meet the needs of its current political conditions but this doesn't call for the abandonment of the analysis and tactics of previous Marxists. Of course, we must be able to understand that these tactics came from different material conditions but they can be used as a foundation for modern tactics. United and Popular fronts come to mind as examples. Dogmatic application of previous analysis is nearly as harmful as revisionism.
In modern times the APL has founded Red Youth Rising a mass organization set on organizing workplaces, communities, tenants, and educating and agitating against capitalism and fascism within the US. I think it's an excellent example of tactics of Marxism under the USA's current conditions
My hesitancy towards APL and similar organizations is that I think they see the unity of nominal Marxists as equivalent to forming a political party. I think this shows in their public materials and rhetoric, which focus heavily on demonstrating their basis in the canonical texts of Marxism rather than strategically analyzing how we're going to organize an independent working class. I wouldn't rule them out as constituent parts of a movement in the making, but I think sects like these can only be justified if they eventually dissolve into the general movement, which is the only force that can birth a communist political faction. I'm not so much criticizing you as an individual here as the way that our generation still hasn't had the kinds of collective experiences and independent organizational efforts necessary to internalize and rebirth Marxism
Cleptes alienus (Chrysididae)

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Starformed Ehalcodon, by Eris
A creature of immensity mounts the upper eyeline and radiates Godlight. Haunches dusted with Spindle glitter support a creature-shape sketched to being by the sentient background radiation of this plane, and wide, banded wings are edged to soar on stellar winds. Finally, irisdual light churning under qyr tx-glass skin is refracted to the metaspectrum of impossibility and spills out of body in cornu spirals.
your prognosis on russia's ability to maintain and expand its near sphere of influence? outside the slow crawl westward in ukraine it looks really pathetic.
hi! i know basically nothing about this topic tbh. but they still export a ton of fossil fuels right? lots to china, india, still a decent amount to central & western europe, single largest supplier of refined fuels to israel, big share of the turkish market, etc.. and they would have benefited in the fuel market from the yemeni and iranian blockades too right.
plus they're still the single largest exporter of wheat on the planet. a lot of countries rely fully on russian wheat imports, armenia and mongolia for some nearby examples. kazakh wheat imports from russia are expected to triple this year, azeri wheat imports are rising and their supply is shifting heavily from turkish and kazakh wheat to russian wheat. russian agricultural exports to uzbekistan and turkmenistan are increasing.
and i mean they export nuclear power plants! to china, india, bangladesh, iran, turkey, egypt, hungary… big, long term, state energy projects. again i dont know much about geopolitics or military stuff and these are just a few economic sectors. but energy and grain supply are classics for a reason. so it looks like a continuing sphere of influence to me
what is one thing you would rather be doing instead of being bored at work?
women !!
the materialist tgirl: god has given me these breasts

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
anyone want to send asks for when im inevitably bored at work tmrw
Nevertheless, the Russian revolution—precisely because of its proletarian character, in that particular sense of which I have spoken—is the prologue to the coming European revolution. Undoubtedly, this coming revolution can only be a proletarian revolution, and in an even more profound sense of the word: a proletarian, socialist revolution also in its content. This coming revolution will show to an even greater degree, on the one hand, that only stern battles, only civil wars, can free humanity from the yoke of capital, and, on the other hand, that only class-conscious proletarians can and will give leadership to the vast majority of the exploited.
We must not be deceived by the present grave-like stillness in Europe. Europe is pregnant with revolution. The monstrous horrors of the imperialist war, the suffering caused by the high cost of living everywhere engender a revolutionary mood; and the ruling classes, the bourgeoisie, and its servitors, the governments, are more and more moving into a blind alley from which they can never extricate themselves without tremendous upheavals.
— lenin, lecture on the 1905 revolution, january 1917
The higher the tide of the movement rose, the more vigorously and decisively did the reaction arm itself to fight the revolution. The Russian Revolution of 1905 confirmed the truth of what Karl Kautsky wrote in 1902 in his book Social Revolution (he was still, incidentally, a revolutionary Marxist and not, as at present, a champion of social-patriotism and opportunism). This is what he wrote:
"...The impending revolution ... will be less like a spontaneous uprising against the government and more like a protracted civil war."
That is how it was, and undoubtedly that is how it will be in the coming European revolution!
— lenin, lecture on the 1905 revolution, january 1917
a few months into my new job where there is always music playing and watermelon sugar by harry styles has become my mortal fucking enemy
my awesome and super viable strategy for overthrowing the us government that doesnt focus on uniting workers internationally and leading workers in advanced capitalist production, transportation, and social reproduction in using their overwhelming numbers and their relationships to the means of their work to expropriate the imperialist bourgeoisie by force. it just sounds like that would be really hard because i dont like those people. i just have vibes based nation building instead. yeah its awesome i just do protests but sometimes i get burned out :((( but then i remember all the reasons to uphold all the actually existing socialisms and resistance to imperialism and intersectional feminism and i lecture some people online and i feel better. and yes im a marxist. dont ask what my parents do for work. slay
i have been reading substacks and old communist books from a single tendency, recommended to me by a single activist clique, for two or three years. i am confident that everyone who disagrees with me is hitler

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Soviet illustration (1923) showing Trotsky, Lenin and Dzerzhinsky as horsemen towering over a capitalist.
The illustration was published on the cover of Red Pepper magazine with the caption 'On the threshold of 1923'. The illustration is based off Viktor Vasnetsov's 1898 painting depicting Dobrynya Nikitich, Ilya Muromets and Alyosha Popovich, three famous bogatyrs (knights) from East Slavic folklore.
Artist is named as 'P. Mina' (П. Мина), who designed many covers for Red Pepper during its short existence from 1923-26 (I wasn't able to find much else about Mina).
Via Propagandopolis
the kind Felix Dzerzhinsky would have done a lot worse