I want to be clear because I don't like my intentions being misunderstood either (autistic af): I don't have personal beef with you or something. I've seen some of your other posts and think they're neat, this one specifically just didn't land. My post wasn't about you as a person or your entire blog. I literally opened it with an explanation that it was the accumulation of posts like this—not me coming for you personally. I was talking about this post. Just this post.
I'm realizing now that maybe you intended this as something like "KDJ is actually strong too and he can hit back, he's not just a helpless victim being oppressed by YJH". And I get it, I can see it if that's what you were going for. But on first glance, without the context of your other meta, that's not how it looks. It reads just as "YJH is physically aggressive, KDJ beats him back, and YJH is his chew toy". And tbh the "chew toy" phrasing especially is doing a lot of damage imo. Even as a joke, it lands...mmm, it just doesn't really.
The phrase itself been sitting so wrong with me beyond just the dehumanizing language, and I think I finally figured out why. There's a difference between "using someone as a chew toy" and what KDJ actually did. Like, a chew toy implies intentionality and it implies you know there's a living thing on the other end and you're deliberately using it for your own amusement without caring about its wellbeing.
But Kim Dokja didn't know Yoo Joonghyuk was real.
For thirteen years, he was just reading a book. A story. Fiction. He wasn't "using" a person—he was reading about a character. However intense his attachment was, however much he projected onto that character, there was no malice because there was no person on the receiving end. You can't use someone who doesn't exist. And even then—even as just a reader—he didn't treat YJH like a chew toy. He worshipped him. The "I am Yoo Joonghyuk" was his go-to to survive his own childhood abuse. He built his entire sense of self around this character. That's not using someone, that's just clinging to a lifeline.
The moment he found out YJH was real? Guilt. He spent the rest of the novel trying to atone. He sacrificed himself over and over and quite literally tore himself apart to give YJH a happy ending. A person who genuinely saw YJH as a chew toy—something to just use and discard—wouldn't do that. They wouldn't feel guilt. They wouldn't spend years trying to make it right. They definitely wouldn't die multiple times for the person they supposedly "used".
So the "chew toy" framing isn't just dehumanizing which is already bad enough, it's just factually wrong about who KDJ is and what their relationship actually looks like. Even before he knew YJH was real, it wasn't that. And after he knew, even less so. Okay now back to the main thing, I'm sorry for rambling.
I know that's not what you meant, but a post has to stand on its own. Most people scrolling past aren't going to read your other meta to get the full context of your views, yk? They're going to see this and absorb it as whatever they see it as because it has way too many holes for interpretation and keep scrolling. And that's the fandom's pattern I'm super frustrated with—shorthand versions that replace the actual dynamic in people's heads.
You're allowed to have a post that doesn't land. Everyone does. But when someone points out why the word choice wasn't the best, the response imo shouldn't be "you're taking it out of context" or "I have other meta that explains it better" or just straight up explaining the novel to me like I don't know it. It's not about that yk? That post exists and it says what it says, and without the decoder ring, it can just read badly. I'm not saying you're a bad fan or a bad person or all your ORV takes are shit. I'm just saying this specific post was not it. So, I stand by what I said about the post, but it wasn't personal and I wasn't trying to be offensive. I genuinely think you've written good stuff, this just wasn't one of them.
And look, this whole situation is kind of stupid yah. The post was stupid. Me taking it this seriously is also kind of stupid. But I don't know, maybe it's still worth it. Because someone has to push back when the shorthand gets bad, even if it makes me look like an overreacting asshole. Anyway.