5 ways the hunger games adaptations messed up for no apparent reason
If anyone knows of a genuine excuse for what look like lazy and unnecessary examples of canon divergence, let me know (and feel free to add your own)
So we're told straight off this cat is ginger right? He's ginger in Catching Fire and both parts of Mockingjay, but in the first film we get...
Like... could they not find a single ginger cat to appear in a 5-second scene? I genuinely don't understand why this happened
4. Burdock Everdeen's death
The first film is the least faithful to the books, to its detriment, and while the lack of narration makes it difficult to accurately convey Katniss' memories, they didn't even really try here. We get a photo on the mantlepiece and a shot of some miners, that's it. There's no associative exposition, showing you that he taught her to hunt, that the jacket she wears was once his (as was the original bow).
When you consider the importance of objects imbued with memory to the series it seemed pretty lazy. And if they gloss over the fact that Burdock and Haymitch were best friends in sotr I might just have to throw hands with the screenwriters
3. The timeline of the double-homicide in tbosas
Having Lucy Gray write 'Pure as Driven Snow' prior to watching Coriolanus shoot Mayfair was a weak move. The timing is important. In the film, it makes her look like a naive teenage girl who doesn't know what he's capable of, in the book it makes her look like a ride-or-die who's fully aware and prepared to try and match his freak with her own.
Idk, the film already made it seem way more like she got fridged to serve the plot (when the ending to the book was much more ambiguous), don't take away her agency like that
2. The architecture of the Capitol
Yeah, I'm as much a fan of the early brutalist style as anyone, but making the Capitol look like Stalinist Russia is a convenient way to ignore the fact The Hunger Games is supposed to be a story of a uniquely American dictatorship.
The books very clearly describe candy-coloured skyscrapers, with important municipal buildings and the president's mansion made from white marble, do you see any candy-coloured skyscrapers here? Didn't think so. We're leaning heavily into Moscow-in-the-40s which is cool but a pretty major divergence from the source material.
And finally, because it was the single daftest decision in adapting tbosas and they're probably going to have to retcon this in sotr or change part of the ending...
The tribute interviews/the ballad of Lucy Gray Baird
Words cannot describe of infuriated I was when I watched this scene, because in sotr, when a young Haymitch stumbles upon clips from the early games, he sees Lucy Gray's performance at the tribute interviews, and we get this:
'The girl bows and extends her hand to a figure who's standing just out of the spotlight. A silhouette of a man. Upright, trim. A crown of curls. He waits a moment, as if deciding whether or not to join her. Then takes a step forward as the screen goes black.'
Haymitch identifies district 12's forgotten victor, he does the maths, and he figures out that Lenore Dove's in grave danger, because there was a reason president Snow seemed to know so much about the covey when they met in the library. But this revelation is only possible because he's seen the one piece of surviving media in the Capitol that links the two of them together.
I'm sure they'll figure out some other way to make it work, but the sheer poetry of the scene happening the exact same way in both tbosas and sotr, of it being the only real evidence of both Lucy Gray's existence and their love story, isn't something you can just replace. Why they decided to have Coriolanus watch the performance from the hospital rather than actually being there is completely beyond me.