I wanna try

Her anti-trans Crisis Centre in Edinburgh has the director of For Women Scotland on the Board of Directors. x

We can presume she's given more (financial) support off the record or in other ways.

Rowling consistently makes passive income on all Harry Potter products. Multiple sources have cited that Rowling earns anywhere between $50 million to a $100 million each year from royalties. Forbes estimated she earned $95 million in 2017 alone. x x x

It is a well-known fact that she earns net profit percentages on all her IP. Every time you buy any HP merch, from anywhere, she gets a cut. Every time you watch one of her films, even streaming or just on the tv, she gets a cut. Every time you visit Universal Studios or Harry Potter World, she gets a cut.

And she uses that money to do this. To strip trans rights at every opportunity.

Like, i get it, AI slop and "AI artists" pretending to be genuine is getting harder and harder to identify, but just accusing someone out of the blue and calling it a day doesn't make it any better.

The AI clowns shifted to styles that have less "tells" and the AI arts are becoming better. Yeah, it sucks ass.

They're also integrating them with memes, so you chuckle and share, like those knights with pink backgrounds, some cool frog and a funny one liner, so you get used to their aesthetic.

This is an art from the new coming set Final Fantasy for MtG. This is someone on Reddit accusing someone of using AI. From what i can tell, and i fucking hate AI, there is NO AI used on this image.

As far as i can tell and as far as any tool i've used, the Artist didn't use AI. which leads to the next one:

they accused the artist of this one of using Ai. the name of this artist is Nestor Ossandon.

He as already been FALSELY ACCUSED of using AI, because he drew a HAND THAT LOOKED A LITTLE WEIRD, which caused a statement from D&D Beyond, confirming that no AI has been used.

Not to repeat mysef, they're accusing the art above, that is by Nestor, to have used Ai.

REAL artists are not machines. And just like the AI slop, we are not perfect and we make mistakes. The hands we draw have wonky fingers sometimes. The folds we draw are weird. But we are REAL. We are real people. And hey, some of our "mistakes" sometimes are CHOICES. Artistic choices are a thing yo.

Missing clothes or any detail is not evidence of ai! Thats absurd. It means the artist forgot them or just didn't want to do it.

Modification to design is by no means sign of ai use! That's absurd. That's due to stylistic/design choices.

Strange hands or unaccurate folds/wrinkles in fabric are historically a complain of beginner artists because they're so hard to learn.

So you can't go looking for those details to try to identify ai anti-art, let alone ruin an artists based on that when all the imbeciles board the difamation train without a second thought (refer to the oldest definition of "imbecile")

Sorry, i can't let this one pass.

This is simply not true.

We don't accidentally draw structures that fade into the crowd and bodies hat morph into other bodies. Yeah, we may portray perspective with inaccuracy either by accident or purpose but art is made with intent, and the lack of intentionality is an AI trait.

This type of behavior on structures isn't an artist accidentally making a mess. An AI doesn't know when or where a perspective ends, so it decided to end it in the middle of a crowd.

Same on those hair ornaments. It KNOWS it was supposed to be there, but it doesn't have the intentionality of knowing what they were supposed to be. So it looks like a garbled mess.

A real artist may mess up the shape of those hair ornaments, but they know what they were supposed to look like.

On this one, the hair blends into the clothes, the flower become a frill, the skirt become a piece of hair and turns asymmetrical. there is no intentionality here.

This is a level of fuck up no human artist make. Because human artists know what they're doing. They make HUMAN mistakes. This is not a HUMAN mistake.

--> I am not shaming any of you for not being able to discern Ai art from human art. This wasn't the intent of this post. <--

What I'm saying is that identifying AI slop is a good skill to have, and if you're to ACCUSE someone of being AI, you MUST know what AI art is and how to identify it.

AI slop "artists" are, and i can't stress enough, pretending to be human. They're doing all they can to pretend to be regular artists, so they can sell prints, merch, and have tables at cons, that so far don't let them.

Accusing the RIGHT AI SLOP OF BEING AI IS A GOOD THING. Accusing the wrong person will fuck their lifehood.

May 2025 free you from all that weighs you down and no longer serves you, bringing a love that heals, uplifts, and transforms; a love that wrecks you in all the right ways. May every choice guide you closer to your truest self, to a life vast and extraordinary, full of wonder. May your heart find calm, your spirit rise, and beauty and possibility bloom in ways you never saw coming.

oh.

ohhhhhhhhh no

You guys, middle class doesnt mean "a stable enough rented roof over your head," it means "a house you bought, a nice car or two, the ability to support a family, and take days off and vacations every year with income to spare for retirement savings and rainy days." If all you have is a rented apartment without a roommate and a used car, you're lower class. That's lower class.

He wanders into a Megachurch on accident, thinking it was a mini mall, and hears an evangelist (who lives in a mansion) taking the Lord's name in Vain to guilt donations out of people. Then he gets arrested for rushing the stage and beating that guy with a whip.

A significant chunk of the movie is just his elaborate escape from prison, wherein he starts a riot upon learning how cruelly the prisoners are treated by a blasphemous carceral system.