THE REJECTED PROPHET

• if you're still posting about somebody and you blocked them, word getting back to them isn't "violating boundaries". Your boundaries can't be "let me speak badly about someone and they can't defend themselves and I can't face consequences."

If you're not using a block button for what it's for - tailoring your online experience and moving on with your life - then your block button means nothing. Nobody has to respect a block that isn't being respected the opposite way. You wanna continue being a dick? Then you don't get to be the victim there.

• If you post about discourse your dni no longer matters. like if you're a discourse blog and all you do is post discourse and reply to people who disagree with you - your posts don't get to be exempt from that. if you're saying "this group does X!" and someone from that group wants to correct you, they can. Because you involved them by mentioning them. Again, boundaries are not allowed to be 'nobody ever call me out or give me consequences.'

1.) I believe blocking has a purpose and if you will continue to shit talk somebody after you blocked them - you waived your rights. Idc if someone screenshots what you said or the other person caught wind and block-evaded - you don't get to play the victim if you're the perpetrator. A block button is not a save from accountability because you're too scared to be shitty to somebody's face.

2.) If you shit talk a group you don't get to dni them. You hate endogenics? Well they get to reply and correct you. Echo chambers are stupid, you don't get to claim a bunch of bs and stupid shit then protect yourself from being fact checked by others.

Both of these are basically: If you post about somebody else (especially in a nefarious way) you don't get to cite "boundaries" as the reason you can't be called out or responded to. That's not how it works. Either stop shit talking people/minorities or accept that others can shit talk you back.