arfarfarfarfarf

That's just too fucking bad, isn't it? ♥

I want you to cum. I want to force that orgasm onto you. I want you to feel it, and I want you to know that I made you feel that way. I might even want to make you do it over and over. Keep a little score to myself on how many times I can make someone cum before I'm spent.

First of all, to state the obvious, putting nonbinary into two gendered boxes is fucking bullshit. I am not a cat I do not enjoy your box.

And what I haven't seen discussed is how placing "afab nonbinary" people as transmisogyny exempt makes genuinely no fucking sense and really shows what this is really about.

The "logic" behind the two boxes is basically "oh all transmascs are men and therefore are treated as men by society so aren't affected by misogyny". This is untrue but at least can make some logical sense of it if you fully ignore how the world actually works. But then when you say that "afab nonbinary" people are also transmisogyny exempt...

What's the logic? Do you think that someone who naturally has female sex characteristics who dresses feminine but is still nonbinary isn't effected by misogyny and transphobia? Do you think that all nonbinary people born female are just "transmasc-lite" and should therefore be put in the same box.

And don't think I'm leaving intersex people out of this either. An intersex person who was assigned female at birth but went through a masculine puberty, then later in life chose to identify as nonbinary and present feminine would be put in the "afab nonbinary" box. In reality, because they went through masculine puberty they would likely be perceived as a trans woman and go through the struggles of one. This person would still be considered transmisogyny exempt by this rigid system.