Anarchisthobbyist

In 1992, he drugged a 23-year-old patient, a woman who had gone to him before and whose baby he delivered, and raped her. The victim, known as Candice/Candy, remembered the assault and that he was the one who did it, and she reported it to the police. Of course, everyone thought she was crazy. Whose side would you take: a respected small town doctor or a young single mother?

When the police took his blood, it didn't match the semen taken from her rape kit. She was adamant this was the man and asked for a re-test. A year later, they took blood again, this time with police observing. The blood didn't match the rape kit. The police closed the case.

Candice/Candy didn't let up and hired a private investigator who did an extremely illegal thing by breaking into Schneeberger's car, stealing some chapstick presumably used by Schneeberger, and testing the DNA. That DNA from the chapstick matched her rape kit.

Due to the illegal seizure, the positive results didn't mean shit, but Candice/Candy brought a civil case against Schneeberger. He agreed to another test, this time the entire thing was videotaped by police. Initially, they asked to take the sample from his fingers. He asked if it could be done from his arm instead, due to some disease that made his fingers swell.

During the video, the examiner tries multiple times to get a sample from his arm. While she's prepping the sample for testing, she looks obviously skeptical. Someone off camera asks her what's wrong. She remarks that, even though she had just taken this sample herself right now, the blood looks...old.

The sample was apparently too degraded for testing, presumably due to a mistake on the lab's part.

The case didn't move again until 1997....when Schneeberger's wife reported to police that her husband was sexually assaulting her daughter from a previous marriage. This had been apparently going on for several years. He would go into her room, give her injections and assault her.

They took a sample from him again, and videotaped it again. This time, they took multiple kinds of DNA samples: hair, blood (taken from his fingers!), saliva...and it all finally matched Candice/Candy's rape kit.

Insultingly, he was sentenced 6 years and got out on parole after 4. But how did he get away with making an entire town turn on a woman and call her crazy, all the while he was raping his stepdaughter in the same way he raped Candice/Candy?

To illustrate the lengths men go to cover up their violence against women, Schneeberger revealed during the trial that he had SURGICALLY INSERTED A PLASTIC TUBE INSIDE HIS ARM that had the blood of someone else inside. He made sure that examiners took blood from that arm in particular. The blood inside the tube had degraded over time, which was why the examiner had noticed it.

I pray that anyone mocking or celebrating the murder of Charlie Kirk lives the long, healthy life Charlie never got to live. I pray that they live long enough to recognize the spiritual cancer rotting them from the inside out. I pray that they live long enough to see the hatred and reject it, like Charlie did. I pray that they live long enough to beg and accept the forgiveness of Charlie's God. And I pray that they embrace Charlie in heaven someday as a friend and brother.

I pray the same for myself and for everyone else sickened by the slaughter of someone we admired.

Yes, I've seen all the quotes and clips taken out of context. ALL of them are out of context. If you understand the context and still want him dead, you want me dead too.

If men hear women expressing frustration with oppression and respond by running to the far right, that’s not a reasonable reaction at all, it’s a threat. It’s saying: agree with us gently or we’ll become worse. That’s simply coercion.

And comparing gender-based violence or systemic misogyny to “privileged whining” ignores the real, measurable harm women face globally and locally every day. You can care about Indigenous struggles and gendered oppression, intersectionality isn’t a competition.

Men of colour although they face racism can absolutely be misogynistic too? I come from an Asian household and we have our cultural misogynistic experience. Our tribes and many others were still patriarchal.

FGM is significantly common in Africa, Asia and Middle East.

Again if all men are oppressors that means here in America indigenous men are oppressing you so why not admit it? Why are you suddenly so scared to say it when it’s someone you legitimately can’t make an argument in your ideology?

If men hear women expressing frustration with oppression and respond by running to the far right, that’s not a reasonable reaction at all, it’s a threat. It’s saying: agree with us gently or we’ll become worse. That’s simply coercion.

And comparing gender-based violence or systemic misogyny to “privileged whining” ignores the real, measurable harm women face globally and locally every day. You can care about Indigenous struggles and gendered oppression, intersectionality isn’t a competition.

You won’t be hearing proposals along these lines from the MAGAsphere, which is seeking to exploit men’s troubles, not solve them.

MAGA opportunistically portrays the solution to men’s distress as a zero-sum game: in order to improve the status of American men, we have to “take back” from the usual suspects – women, our trading partners, the intellectual elites, environmentalists, the “deep state” and the historically disadvantaged. - Paul Krugman

The MAGA witch hunt will not help American men. Raising pay for females coded jobs will.

You realize being anti sex and anti liberation is part of the patriarchy right? By demanding women not be able to express their sexual fantasies you are shaming them with the very thing men do to keep them in line and from behaving as a normal human would. People are sexual. They have many fantasies and feelings regarding sex and historically women have been repressed using the same logic you use here.