the whole ethics of small artist business practices discussion is also really rough because a not insignificant amount of the people who end up making that their living are doing so because they are structurally barred from more standard and secure employment for various reasons. if you, like me, are far too disabled to survive via entry level positions in places like retail or food service and lack the qualifications to get a foot in the door for a desk job then your options are extremely limited. i was trying to make a living with art after i left school because it's one of the only ways you can make money if you have to spend most of your time in bed.
i am extremely lucky to have a robust enough support network of friends and family to know that whatever happens i will never be homeless, and even luckier to have friends hook me up with a work from home position i never in a million years would have been in consideration for without a referral. it's not lost on me that it is significantly easier for me to take a strong stance on this issue than it is for other people with similar circumstances through absolutely no merit of my own. but ultimately no matter how precarious your own situation is, being in a position where purchasing cheap foreign labor to sell goods at a significant markup is even an option is a pretty notable privilege! and not only that, but factory work itself can also be disabling. Disabled People and Foreign Factory Workers aren't two separate groups of underprivileged people with competing material interests and i just can't ever let myself think of it that way. it would be wrong.
disabled people outside of the imperial core aren't a gotcha to win an argument they're not a rhetorical tool they're not a thought experiment. a lot of them are in fact disabled because of what has been done to their environment in the name of global commerce. they're real people and any politics of disability that considers them irrelevant or disposable isn't good enough.
and so the question then becomes: if you are a disabled artist, if selling merch really has been the only way you've found to make ends meet, what are you supposed to do? i don't have a good answer because i'm literally just some lady with a blog and solving all the ethical contradictions of living as a disprivileged person in an incredibly privileged parts of the world is a bit above my paygrade. but it would also be wrong to pretend like this is not a real dilemma people have to contend with.
the line a lot of people use to justify small businesses' practices to themselves and others is "why are we holding independent artists to higher standards than big corporations?" but i do think this is a bad argument for a lot of reasons. if you reframe this question even a little bit, you'll realize what's being asked is "Why do we expect our peers to behave more ethically than entities that are structured to extract the maximum possible wealth from the world, and consider human lives to be a disposable commodity used towards that end?" I would hope the answer to This particular question is self evident.