The Murderbot Diaries is one of my favorite book series and Iâm absolutely LOVING the show, so I absolutely had to draw fanart. So excited for the finale!!

seen from Germany

seen from Slovakia

seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from Finland
seen from Canada
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States
seen from TĂŒrkiye
seen from Morocco
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Czechia

seen from United States

seen from Canada
seen from Canada

seen from TĂŒrkiye

seen from Canada
The Murderbot Diaries is one of my favorite book series and Iâm absolutely LOVING the show, so I absolutely had to draw fanart. So excited for the finale!!

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch âą No registration required âą HD streaming
Fitz Fitz Fitz
N Main Street, Witt, Illinois.
Why was it Buonarroti who wrote the Memoirs of the Conspiracy of the Equals and not Félix Le Peletier, even though Gracchus had explicitly asked him to do so? (Theories)
Warning: The following text discusses how FĂ©lix Le Peletier described Louis XVI, Marie-Antoinette, and Louis XVIII. These descriptions are historically hostile, exaggerated, or false, and in some cases insulting. They reflect Le Peletierâs own polemical style, not historical fact.
Before he died, Gracchus asked Le Peletier for several things: to take care of his family (and, to a lesser extent, he made the same request to Suzanne Le Peletier, the daughter of Michel Le Peletier and niece of Félix), and also to tell his story.
Le Peletier kept the first promise, as you can see here: https://www.tumblr.com/nesiacha/767963454663442432/letter-from-babeuf-to-f%C3%A9lix-le-peletier-5?source=share
He adopted Ămile, treating him as his own son, likely took care of the two other boys, Camille and CaĂŻus, and ensured that Gracchus Babeufâs widow had enough means to run a small business. He treated them all like his own family. However, he did not keep the second promise. This was not due to any distancing from the Babeuf familyâhe remained close to them until the end, and they shared the persecutions imposed by successive regimes without ever betraying one another.
I believe there were several reasons for this. First, even though the friendship between FĂ©lix Le Peletier and Babeuf was deepâso much so that Babeuf reportedly said after FĂ©lixâs death: âWhat is joy? I barely ever knew it.ââand even though they never betrayed each other, historian Jean-Marc Schiappa notes that Babeuf only asked FĂ©lix to write his story because Buonarroti and Charles Germain had been sentenced to deportation at the VendĂŽme trial. They would have been his first choice. Thus, when Buonarroti was eventually spared deportation, Le Peletier may have believed that he should be the one to write the Conspiracy of the Equalsâwhich he finally did in 1828.
Second: Buonarroti and Le Peletier presented their former âcomradesâ in very different ways. In his Histoire de la RĂ©volution et de la Restauration, Le Peletierâstrongly anti-Bourbon and fond of provocationâdescribed Louis XVI as a man of âextreme weakness,â âstingy, selfish, coarse, and ill-tempered,â âmechanically devout,â and even attributed to him vulgar and degrading behavior such as the fact that he allegedly humiliated certain people by "(...)farting in their faces", according to FĂ©lixâs own words . Marie-Antoinette is described as having an âirritable and despotic nature.â
His attacks on Louis XVIII were even harsher: he mocked the kingâs physical condition, saying he âascended the throne as an impotent man, almost crippled,â and devoted ten scathing pages to him as well as to a supposed mistress. He even claimed that Louis XVIIIâs young Savoyard wife took loversâamong them, according to him, a gardener from Petit-Montreuilâwhom the king supposedly had arrested after discovering the affair. Le Peletier ended with this bitter remark: âOne might excuse resentment or even vengeance in such a case from anyone able to enjoy such seductive prerogativesâif only one were not a nobody.â
As you may expect, his sources were extremely weakâalmost exclusively Le Moniteur. His hatred of the Bourbons was both ideological and personal: he blamed them for his brotherâs death, for the persecutions he himself suffered, and for the exile imposed on his political peers (temporary for some, fatal for others). His adopted son Ămile Babeuf nearly died after being condemned to deportation during the White Terror in the 1816 âAffaire des patriotes,â though the sentence was later annulled. CaĂŻus Babeuf died defending Paris in 1814.
Despite containing serious political reflections, his work is interesting for another reason: it contains virtually no reference to the doctrine of the 1796 conspirators, except for two brief remarks about land ownershipâcriticizing âthe deplorable and nearly incurable wounds caused by the concentration of land in the hands of a few,â and arguing that the âindispensable right of propertyâ must be balanced by âindemnity for the natural rights that such an indispensable right tramples.â
Concerning another historical figure, Le Peletier spoke of Lazare Carnot as âa name made great by virtue and talent.â This is unsurprising: Carnot had protected him during the repression of the Babouvistsâeven though he was one of the main architects of that repression. https://www.tumblr.com/aedislumen/789539824989339648/nesiacha-here-some-interesting-excerpts-i-found?source=share
Le Peletier also worked for Carnot during the Hundred Days and refused the LĂ©gion dâhonneur he offeredânot out of hostility toward Carnot, but because he despised Bonaparte.
Buonarroti would never have shared this positive view of Carnot, especially when writing the Conspiracy of the Equals. He was milder toward him than toward figures such as Barras, FrĂ©ron, Merlin de Thionville, Legendre, or Grisel, but the only passage referring to Carnot that I find on him is clear: " âAt that time, the steadfast friends of equality were deeply distressed by the depravity which, creeping even into the opinions of many revolutionaries, threatened to consign democratic doctrines to eternal oblivion. In general, the patriotsâmost of whom acted more out of impulse than reflectionâtook pride in the victory of VendĂ©miaire, regarded the appointment of Barras and Carnot to the Executive Directory as one of the fortunate events of the Revolution, and consoled themselves for their long misfortunes with the prospect of the positions and favors they flattered themselves with obtaining. It seemed as though they had forgotten the cause for which they had fought, and that, viewing with an indifferent eye the encroachment upon the rights of the peopleâan encroachment that had just been accomplishedâthey placed the salvation of the fatherland in the alleviation of their own hardships.â .
The opinion that Buonarroti (and Babeuf himself) held of Carnot never changed: https://www.tumblr.com/nesiacha/767944757763883008/babeuf-et-la-r%C3%A9publique-pers%C3%A9e?source=share
Even though Ămile Babeuf later worked for Carnot during the Hundred Daysâand Carnot may have softened his stance toward the BabouvistsâBuonarroti still saw him as one of the morally âcleanestâ among those responsible for the repression, but still responsible nonetheless. Interestingly, Hippolyte Carnot wrote that Buonarroti attended a few Saint-Simonian lectures where he was treated with respect, though he quickly distanced himselfâaccording to Hippolyteâs text On Saint-Simonism. These differences could only deepen existing ideological divides.
Another important point is that Le Peletierâs writings were far less documented than Buonarrotiâs.
This leads me to another hypothesis. In one of his letters, knowing he was going to die, Babeuf wrote about his wife:
âWhen my body returns to the earth, nothing will remain of me but a large number of projects, notes, and drafts of revolutionary writings⊠My wife will be able to gather them all⊠When persecution subsides⊠you will then be able to search these scraps and present them to the disciples of Equality⊠for the benefit of my memory.â
In his farewell letter, he entrusted several documents to her, and she took great care of them. Contrary to what Babeuf sometimes pretended to protect her, she was far more politically involved than people claimed. Beyond helping him print pamphlets, she was cunning, politically astute, and deeply involved in clandestine activities. Her political views must have aligned closely with his (and likely influenced his as well).
She may therefore have believed that Buonarroti was the most suitable person to write the history of the conspiracyâperhaps even granting him access to certain documents (likely through correspondence), allowing him to refine his account as a participant of the first rank. Everything suggests she preferred Buonarrotiâs perspective over that of Le Peletier, friendships notwithstanding.
Le Peletierâs strong dislike of Robespierreâas I explained here https://www.tumblr.com/nesiacha/795923031920885760/the-tumultuous-relationship-between-maximilien?source=share âwhile Buonarroti greatly admired him (as did Gracchus), is only a secondary factor in my view.
P.S.: In the Conspiracy of the Equals, Buonarroti deliberately protected those who were still alive at the time of publication, since France was then ruled by Charles X. This is why the roles of figures like Marie-Anne and Ămile Babeuf are minimized, as well as those of several other conspirators.
This also suggests that if Marie-Anne preferred Buonarrotiâs account to that of FĂ©lix Le Peletier, she must have disapproved even more of her sonâs memoirs, which were entirely inaccurate.
To learn more about the relationships between Ămile Babeuf, his parents, FĂ©lix Le Peletier, and Buonarroti; his political involvement as a child of the French Revolution; the persecutions he suffered under Bonaparte and Louis XVIII; his position during the 100 days when he worked for Carnot and his later reactionary turn that cost him the political trust of his parentsâ friends. , see here: https://www.tumblr.com/nesiacha/797365648777953280/the-beginning-of-the-revolutionary-period?source=share
Kaladin asking Witt what a dog is in Rhythm of War is soooo funny considering heâs the most Dog Shaped character of all time

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch âą No registration required âą HD streaming
Check it out
Witt took care of that other guy a little too handily, like he's had some experience covering up crimes...
LMAO! The air quotes!
Aaahhh!!! Detective Luna!
I'm here for all of the hair jokes!
Poor Cap thinking Kelly is pregnant.
Uh, Stella, talking to your dad about a criminal is not rash. When did Sadie become the responsible one?
Ooh, an old-fashioned stand-off!
Awe, Augie was so sweet there! But also, that's an alarming amount of trauma for two teenagers.
Poor Cap (continued). His rangers and his wife have been lying to him, and the Jackal is back.
Love the callback to Stella and Augie chatting while lying down. Especially loved Augie's "August Walker." A few more years and he can add "Texas Ranger" to that introduction!
That final shot of the all the rangers at the crime scene... beautiful and heartbreaking.
Wonderful Precure Episode 22 Review - Dog Training
This episode mainly revolves around dog training and how to bond with dogs. It really reminded me of Dog Signal as itâs an anime that revolves around dog training. Other than that, itâs mainly a feel-good low stakes episode where the Precures do cute things.