Lou (me): „Why do you tag those so randomly just use the same tags as we did before-„
Er (our idiot alter): „louis darling i click whatever pops in its not that deep”
-lou
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Saudi Arabia

seen from China

seen from United States
seen from China
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from China

seen from Armenia
seen from Russia

seen from India

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from France
seen from United States

seen from Ecuador
seen from Paraguay

seen from Germany
Lou (me): „Why do you tag those so randomly just use the same tags as we did before-„
Er (our idiot alter): „louis darling i click whatever pops in its not that deep”
-lou

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Throwback to the times when I thought I was faking disorders and now I don’t even have to scroll through plural tags to find fellow endo systems (it makes me so happy xhshs)
-lou
Hello.
So, we’re pro-radqueer. And we wanted to include this in our intro post. However, I feel like mentioning it would only force us to explain „why”, every time one of our friends sees it. So, writing this in advance, I guess.
Firstly, most of the identities we’ve encountered in the rq community were not harmful at all - quite the opposite, actually. The community seemed to be very kind and accepting, which are, for us, very appreciated traits.
What I haven’t found in the radqueer community so far are pro-contact pedophiles // pro-contact zoophiles. And I’m aware that those are also a part of radqueers, but that shouldn’t give others permission to spread hate about the community as a whole.
We ourselves used to identify one of our alters as trans intersex, before we found out that innosexual is a thing. Both of them fit our experience, so why wouldn’t it be valid? Why would one label be considered „bad” and the other „good”? It’s just a way of describing something.
As beings who have used rq labels in the past and might again in the future; what we want is to know we’re not alone. That we’re not alone in experiencing these things. We want a community, somewhere. A community that doesn’t judge what we identify as. And maybe, just maybe, what we want, is to have that small label, so we don’t feel so excluded.
For us, saying that [for example] trans autistic people are invalid, because „NO, BELIEVE ME, YOU DON’T WANT THAT.” is the same as saying that trans women are invalid because „NO, BELIEVE ME, BEING A WOMAN IS SO AWFUL, AND YOU WANTING THAT IS SO DISRESPECTFUL FOR ME AS A REAL WOMAN-„ No. If you wouldn’t say it to a trans woman, don’t say it to a transID person. And, if it’s still not obvious, I would like to announce to any trans plurals - you’re 100% welcome in this blog. Sometimes the experience of being plural, even if it’s not the happiest experience, is better than feeling dysphoric. It’s better than constantly thinking „I belong nowhere.”
We know how difficult it is, to face those thoughts 🫂
-Co