Frankfurt's compatibilsm states that humans have freewill insofar as they recognise their own biases, desires, and wants and then 'identify' with them
He uses three examples to illustrate his point:
1.The wanton addict, who acts on their first order desires unthinkingly e.g. in drugged stupor
2. The unwilling addict, who recognises their 1st order desires, doesn't want to act on them, but fails - e.g. someone trying to quit smoking but who takes a puff.
3. The willing addict, who recognises their 1st order desires, and chooses to act/not act on them, and succeeds.
For Frankfurt, only the willing addict can be said to be free.

















