#reverse discrimination

President Trump thinks the Civil Rights Movement—a series of laws and events that brought the country closer to realizing the full humanity of Black people, LGBTQ people, and women—was “reverse discrimination.”

“Do you believe … that the civil rights protections that Americans had, starting in the 1960s and so forth, resulted ultimately in the discrimination against white men?” The New York Times’ David E. Sanger asked the president in an interview released on Sunday.

“Well, I think that a lot of people were very badly treated. White people were very badly treated, where they did extremely well and they were not invited to go into a university or a college. So I would say in that way, I think it was unfair in certain cases,” Trump replied. “I think it was also, at the same time, it accomplished some very wonderful things, but it also hurt a lot of people—people that deserve to go to a college or deserve to get a job were unable to get a job. So it was, it was a reverse discrimination.”

Arguing that increased equality somehow made white Americans worse off is rhetoric straight from the Elon Musk, Stephen Miller, and Nick Fuentes script. And the clumsiness of Trump’s explanation suggests that he’s just parroting their talking points rather than drawing his own conclusion on how exactly the Civil Rights Movement stopped white people from getting jobs and going to college. Either way, this argument is facetious and rooted in white supremacist ideology.

Also this indigenous sex goddess kicks dudes in the crotch because immature crotch-kicking is the “ultimate feminist vengeance.”

By: Ben Kochman

Published: May 5, 2026

The New York Times passed over a white male worker with the right chops for an editor’s job — instead choosing a less qualified multiracial woman, a federal watchdog claimed Tuesday, suing the Gray Lady.

The US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission accused the newspaper of breaching civil-rights law by discriminating against the unnamed male candidate based on his race or sex, according to the agency’s complaint filed in Manhattan federal court.

[ The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission accused the New York Times of passing over a white man for a top editorial role in favor of a less-qualified multiracial candidate to meet diversity goals. ]

Nikita Stewart — the Times’ then-real-estate editor who has since been promoted to metro editor — “deviated from normal hiring protocol” in January 2025 to hire someone without experience editing real-estate coverage to work as her deputy, the suit alleged.

The white man who was bypassed for the gig had “considerable experience with real estate news,” which had been a supposed requirement included on the public job listing for the position, the EEOC claimed in the reverse-discrimination lawsuit.

The Times’ hiring decision came amid a broader push at the paper to add more non-white managers in leadership positions.

The paper in 2021 developed a “Call To Action,” which stated that “people of color—and particularly women of color—remain notably underrepresented in its leadership,” the suit said.

Times spokeswoman Danielle Rhoades Ha dismissed the lawsuit Tuesday as a “politically motivated” case brought by a Trump administration, which that has frequently clashed with the outlet.

“Our employment practices are merit-based and focused on recruiting and promoting the best talent in the world,’’ Ha said in a statement. “We will defend ourselves vigorously.

“Neither race nor gender played a role in this decision – we hired the most qualified candidate, and she is an excellent editor,” Ha said of the deputy editor, who has not been identified, either.

But the suit urged a federal judge to order the Times to enact policies that “provide equal employment opportunities for individuals regardless of race or sex,” and to award the unnamed allegedly stiffed editor punitive damages.

The case comes amid a series of attacks by the Trump administration on so-called “diversity, equity and inclusion” initiatives at businesses.

Trump has separately filed a $15 billion defamation lawsuit against the Times and publisher Penguin Random House for publishing the book “Lucky Loser: How Donald Trump Squandered His Father’s Fortune and Created the Illusion of Success” by Times journalists Susanne Craig and Russ Buettner.

==

There's no such thing as "reverse discrimination." It's discrimination: racism and sexism. No qualifier.

ABIDJAN, IVORY COAST - In what critics are calling the latest example of woke Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) hiring, an African cocoa bean plantation in Abidjan has come under fire after it was revealed that it exclusively staffs black laborers. The plantation in question, which has been in operation for decades, insists that its staffing demographics are a reflection of the local population and available workforce. Regardless, the plantation’s lack of white laborers has caused them to receive backlash for what some people are calling “reverse discrimination.”

“This is just yet another example of this ‘woke’ mentality infiltrating the workforce,” said Todd Masters, a 35 year old man from rural Ohio who has been infuriated about this cocoa bean plantation’s staffing policies ever since he found out about it on Facebook a little over two days ago.

“Leftists will insist that this makes things more diverse, but it’s actually having the opposite effect if you’re denying every other race this position just so one group of people can get it. If I wanted to move to Ghana or whatever and pick beans, then I should be able to regardless of my race. The hiring process should be based on merit, not race. I mean, that’s what equality is all about, right?”

For example, if someone gives you a bad vibe so you stay away from them, that's completely justified. If someone gives you a bad vibe so you physically assault them, that's nowhere near justified.

Nigerian women and politics: Beyond reverse discrimination, By Bolutife Oluwadele

The participation of women in politics ought not to attract any debate, if not for the noticed tendency towards reverse discrimination. All the same, the growth of the army of women in politics is a necessary development. We should do all things possible to ensure that this is not hindered in any way. It is about time women in Nigeria step out to be counted, more so at this juncture when the…