Jumping off from the "prog het" post, I would solicit your opinion: I've been involved in fandoms where if a ship wasn't "gay" enough, it was written off, with the consequence of usually completely erasing bi characters/bi fans and their experiences as well as actively alienating straight fans. It also tends to be an age thing, with older fans embracing bi characters, or characters of any sexuality, and younger fans being upset if something isn't "gay" enough, (cont)
(cont) and then charmingly telling older fans they donât belong in fan spaces and should go pay their taxes; especially cute if itâs for a fandom the older fans actually grew up with. Did the concept of âprog hetâ merely swing the other way, where only âsufficiently gayâ content is âvalid?â I also often see a lot of the same bad actors involved in âantiâ wank.Â
I did not observe that one happening in the wild, but can venture a few guesses.
My training in mental health taught me to focus on the process, not the content. Which is to say: To look at patterns of whether people are impulsive or thoughtful, tolerant or judgmental, empathetic or merciless, balanced or polarized. To see if theyâre able to build identities and relationships that slowly change as they learn and grow, or if those identities alternate between extreme rigidity and absolute breakdown. Thatâs far, far more important than what theyâre concerned about.
Because yeah, if someone has the tendency to hold a really strict dogmatic belief, and to judge people on how well they conform to that ideal, and to flip out and cut ties with anyone who begins to question them, they are way more likely to just switch dogmatic beliefs, than to learn how to be okay with ambiguity and not-knowing and people who arenât on the same page. When theyâre presented with unequivocal proof that their old set of ideas doesnât work, they can just jump to, âOkay, this OTHER set of extremely rigid beliefs will be Much Better!â
Partly because distress tolerance and comfort with ambiguity and telling people what you want and need and are okay with, without being aggressive or abusive, are all really complicated skills that need to be modelled for you; theyâre incredibly hard for someone who doesnât have them to just intuit them out of thin air, and then deal with the really painful process of practicing and fine-tuning them enough to make them useful in day-to-day life.
And age is partly to do with it. These are skills that humans arenât really equipped to start mastering until weâre teenagers, and they donât really solidify for most people until their early-to-mid twenties. So it is in fact REALLY NORMAL for teenagers to go through periods of being super rigid and extreme, and to flip back and forth between different positions and concerns as part of their development, and not to have developed the ability to predict other peoplesâ reactions or future consequences enough to understand the effect theyâre having on other people.. The best thing for them is honestly contact with grounded adults who can say, âHuh, thatâs an interesting opinion. Iâm not sure I agree with all of it, but Iâd be interested to hear how you got there,â and, âI donât care how problematic she is, you canât be viciously mean to your friend.â
Which, you know, in a PERFECT WORLD, they would have. Theyâd have teachers and professors and mentors and group norms and, who knows, website moderators, to help the discussion from getting too overwrought and out of hand. But on the Wild West that is Tumblr, that does not happen, and every mood swing and black-and-white mindset gets amplified to an incredible degree.
So yeah, I 100% believe that a lot of the people who fed into âprog hetâ before this have just 180âČd themselves into a different faction of the fandom purity police.