#plotnitsky

Ukrainian court sentences Russian proxy “republic” ex-leaders to life imprisonment in absentia for 2014 airplane downing

The two Russian-run self-proclaimed “republics” occupy roughly one-third of Ukraine’s Donbas region. Map: Euromaidan Press The judges were reading out their 130-page verdict over two days. In it, they found “LNR head” Igor Plotnitsky and two other militant leaders – Andrey Patrushev and Alexandr Gureev – guilty of committing a terror attack, which was their main accusation at the trial. It was…

Ferito da una bomba il capo di una delle regioni separatiste ucraine

Il presidente di una delle regioni separatiste ibride russe in Ucraina, sabato è stato ferito in un probabile tentativo di assassinio: l’attentato mette in evidenza l’aumento della violenza nella zona est del paese.

Una bomba – l’arma preferita in questa mezza dozzina di ultimi e misteriosi omicidi successi nel territorio– ha sventrato parte della macchina su cui viaggiava Igor V. Plotnitsky, il…

UKRAINE - Minsk 2.0 a été organisé afin de sauver les mercenaires de l'OTAN encerclés dans le Donbass

Minsk-2 took place to rescue NATO mercenaries from entrapment in Donbass 13.02.2015 |Source: Pravda.Ru

L’Armée de l’Ukraine a tenté de débloquer le chaudron de Debaltsevo pendant les deux derniers jours. Des unités fraiches et bien entrainées des forces Ukrainiennes tentent d’annorcer une offensive massive, a dit Artem Timchenko, un MP de Novorossiya, le porte-parole du Comité pour les…

Abstract: The paper explores the ontology and logic of the irreducibly multiple in set theory and in topos theory by considering the differences between Badiou’s logical and Grothendiek’s ontological approach to topos theory. It argues that Grothendiek’s ontological program for topos theory leads to a more radical concept of the multiple than does the set-theoretical ontology, which defines Badiou’s view of ontology even in his later, more topos theoretically oriented work. Extending Grothendieck’s way of thinking to other fields enables one to give ontological multiplicities – no longer bound by the set-theoretical ontology or ultimately by any mathematical ontology, even in mathematics – a great diversity and richness. It follows that the set-theoretical ontology is not sufficiently rich to accomplish what Badiou thinks it could accomplish even in mathematics itself, let alone elsewhere; and Badiou wants it to work elsewhere – indeed, wherever it is possible to speak of ontology. I shall also consider, in closing, some implications of the arguments for the workings of the multiple in ethics, politics, and culture.