#find 10 differences

I know that the random is very popular now: people give skeletons in different au different age, race, height, random individuality without relation with undertale game, etc, just because artists don’t care about logic. However, au always have certain rules and concept, they work like a system, not like a broken phone. That’s why they can be collective. I’ve been waiting for a normal swapfell the second year already: without five years old Sans, with headcanons and without kink-porn. And in the end I get what people is trying to turn into a separate au with headcanons and storyline the kink porn, and trying to make one of old dead swapfell!designs (because author left fandom and deleted everything, well, I did not see any headcanons, but several arts with the design of the characters’s clothes) as canon and exalt it over the remaining versions. I thought it was bad before, but everything is a million times worse now.   Swapfell is a collective au. Simultaneous attraction and curse of collective au is absence of canon. Often even a design. There is only a concept: an evil Underswap or a swapped Underfell (which is basically the same, since 2 + 3 = 5 and 3 + 2 = 5). Thus, trying give name for сertain design is insanity. I’m not the only one who’s annoyed what is happening now with this tag because of a сertain popular artist. I guess this artist just trying to do their favorite abusive/bdsm version of swapfell as separate au (or what), but this looks really weird because it’s not separate au. It’s just one of many versions of swapfell yet. Bdsm-version of swapfell is not even the only version of red swapfell. It's just the most popular because of porn. And it’s really bad reason for turning exectly this version into “new” au.

And what was created by KH? Fell? No. Swap? No. Fusion? Lol, no. Violet color? Are you kidding me? I see zero reasons to praise this person over the others artists. People do not need kh to do swapfell. They need underswap and a brain, that's all. Swapfell has existed for more than a year as a collective au, and turning it into an author's au is very rude to the huge number of artists. We don't praise the first author who decided to draw a humanization of undertale. So we shouldn't praise the first author who drew swapfell (primogeniture may not be true, since all evidence is destroyed)