āRemoving Your Faceā is an MKUltra Dogwhistle š
So, Caitlin Moran allegedly claimed that Ben could āremove his face at festivals.ā Cute, right? Wrong. That wasnāt āquirky humour.ā That was Fabian code. Anyone whoās read anything about trauma-based mind control knows exactly what āremoving your faceā means: Alters. Switching. Dissociation as performance. Itās not a metaphor, itās a tell. Moran has been around establishment media long enough to know the language. Sheās mocked Ben before and even made him cry in public, humiliation as entertainment. By dropping āremove his face,ā she both signals insider knowledge and ridicules him in front of an audience who wonāt get the reference. To the uninitiated: āHaha, Benās so skilled that he can disguise himself!ā To those in the know: āWe control him so completely that he canāt even keep his System together without our say-so.ā Thatās not storytelling. Thatās weaponized disclosure and the fact that itās said so casually is part of the ritual: make it public, disguise it as a joke, then dismiss anyone who notices as paranoid.
Funny how those āquirkyā Dish anecdotes sound like reheated fragments of his actual life, scrambled into cover stories: Thriller dance? That was with Olivia Poulet years ago. Chewbacca impersonation? He did that on Graham Norton. Stuffy fursuit? 'Eric'. Face-removal at festivals? Thatās a lazy metaphor for DID. Itās the same repetitive tactic: blend fragments of truth with PR lies until you canāt tell which is which. Let's not forget how Cunterās own SIL got her dreck novel 'The End We Start From' fast-tracked into a film. Not because of āartistic merit.ā It was a Fabian laundering op, a mediocre cultural project to funnel hush money and keep Benās silence intact. Another Fabian beneficiary, just like Moran. Funny how itās always the same network: Moran, longtime Fabian mouthpiece and Camp Cunter, tied to Fabian Handlers. The publishing/film pipeline conveniently opening up for them and Fabians arenāt just some leftist intellectual club. Theyāre the cultural arm of the Frankist machine, desperately recycling trauma narratives because said machine is sputtering. Even Mandyās not doing so great these days, his influence is waning, and his usefulness as a Fixer is dwindling. If thatās the fate of a Rothschild cousin, what does that say about the rest of their mid and low tier Assets? Soon it wonāt be Ben crying in public, itāll be them.
PS: The š¹ in 'The Roses' is also a nod to the Fabians themselves and by extension, Labour.

















