These songs were from around that time,
when both the internet and texting were starting to become common place but man hearing them now is just hilariously dated.
Lyrics about e-mailing, paging and Aol messaging these songs were definitely a product of itâs time and this post is just showcasing that weird trend of displaying website domains in the title of a song.
Such innocent times back when you wanted to go online.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
â Live Streamingâ Interactive Chatâ Private Showsâ HD Qualityâ Free Actions
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
There's something really funny about how the first CODEC conversation in Metal Gear Solid 2 has Otacon mentioning that "every state, group, and dotcom has its own version of Metal Gear" (emphasis mine).
Like let's set aside how dotcoms are being treated as being on the same level as a country, but 1. he said it's every dotcom, and 2. can you imagine. Ebay as it was envisioned during 2001 with its own knockoff version of Metal Gear REX. Amazon firing your packages directly to your house via a railgun that was originally designed for stealth-ICBMs. Pets Dot Com doing an ad with its "Because Pets Can't Drive" tagline showing a cute doggy in a mecha cockpit. A Metal Gear model called "Metal Gear DOTCOM."
People keep saying âthe AI bubble is going to burstâ like that means AI will vanish.
Thatâs not what a bubble is.
A bubble isnât âthe technology isnât real.â
A bubble is money + expectations getting ahead of reality: valuations, spending, and promises outpacing what can be delivered reliably, at scale, and profitably.
So when the bubble âbursts,â what typically dies isnât the invention. What dies is:
the valuation fantasy
the âthis will replace everything by Tuesdayâ nonsense
the VC-funded clones with no business model
the grift, the vapourware, the âAI-powered toasterâ era
If you want the classic comparison: the dot-com bubble burst, and we didnât lose the internet. We lost a pile of magical thinking â and what survived became infrastructure.
Amazon is the cleanest example.
During the dot-com crash, Amazonâs stock got absolutely pulverized (yes, it was that dramatic), and plenty of people assumed it wouldnât make it. And yet: Amazon kept operating, kept building, and later hit major profitability milestones after the bust.
Thatâs what bubbles do: not âno more internet,â but no more free money for vibes.
And yes â some companies will die anyway. Thatâs how busts work. Plenty of AI startups exist because funding was easy, not because the product was durable. When the money gets picky, a bunch of consumer-facing tools (especially the ones running on expensive compute with no clear revenue model) will get shut down, paywalled, or absorbed. That still isnât âno more AI.â Itâs âno more AI companies surviving on investor faith alone.â
So no: âbubble burstâ doesnât mean âno more AI.â
It means no more tolerance for hype that canât pay rent.
What does an AI bubble burst actually look like?
Not a Hollywood explosion.
More like:
Investors start demanding receipts
Less âwe added AIâ marketing. More âshow me measurable impact.â
The infrastructure bill becomes the plot
AI isnât just software. Itâs data centres, power, chips, supply chains, and operating costs.
Consolidation accelerates
Big players with compute and distribution survive. Smaller companies get squeezed or swallowed.
Free tiers shrink and gimmicks die
The pointless âAI everywhereâ features quietly disappear first. The boring useful stuff survives.
The language shifts
Less ârevolution.â More ânarrow use-cases.â Less prophecy, more product.
Accessibility gets put at risk â again
Because it always does when budgets get nervous.
That last one matters, so Iâm saying it plainly:
I want the hype bubble to burst. I do not want access to support tools to be treated as collateral damage.
So yes: I want the bubble to burst (if what dies is the hype)
Let me be crystal clear, because the internet loves pretending nuance doesnât exist:
Iâm a regular AI user.
And I want the bubble to burst if it means the hype collapses.
Not the tools.
Not the assistive uses.
Not the ability for disabled people to get support in a world that refuses to build support systems on purpose.
The hype.
Because hype does what it always does:
turns everything into a moral crusade
rewards inflated promises over boring reality
funds a million clones with no business model
convinces normal people AI is either magic or the devil
And the reality check is already happening: plenty of organizations are discovering that âproof-of-conceptâ is easy, but scaling safely and profitably is hard â especially when data quality, risk controls, and unclear ROI collide.
Hereâs the part people keep skipping:
The money problem is the real bubble.
A lot of bubble talk boils down to one question:
Whoâs paying for this infrastructure â and with what revenue?
Because the future still needs to pay the electric bill.
Collateral damage: accessibility always gets hit first
Now the part that makes me tired in advance:
When hype crashes and budgets tighten, accessibility tools often get treated like âextras.â They get cut first. They get paywalled first. They get deprioritized first.
Disabled people already know this pattern. Weâve lived it.
And yes: we adapt. We jury-rig. We repurpose general tools into survival tools. We build scaffolding out of whatever the world accidentally leaves within reach.
AI assistants fit that pattern perfectly: a general-purpose system becomes access for many people â planning, writing, summarizing, translation, organizing, rehearsing, reducing friction.
But hereâs the key point:
âWe can adaptâ is not a justification for making us collateral damage again.
If youâre anti-AI and you want the bubble to burst: aim at regulation and corporate hype â not at users
If youâre cheering for the âAI bubbleâ to pop because youâre sick of the hype?
Cool. Same.
But hereâs where a lot of people go off the road and straight into a ditch:
They donât aim their anger at the companies selling fantasies, or the investors funding delusions, or the lack of regulation that lets harms scale.
They aim it at regular users.
At hobbyists. Students. Disabled people. Autistic people. People using a tool to get through a day that wasnât built for them.
Thatâs not activism. Thatâs just punching down with better branding.
If you want the bubble to burst in a way that actually improves things, hereâs the target list:
regulate data practices (consent, provenance, privacy â not âtrust me broâ datasets)
regulate deployment (where/how AI can be used, especially in high-stakes contexts)
force transparency (claims, limitations, testing standards, reporting)
stop âAI everywhereâ coercion (no one should be forced into it to access basic services)
protect accessibility (because itâs always first on the chopping block when the money gets nervous)
If your version of âbursting the bubbleâ is âmake it socially punishable to use a tool,â congratulations: you didnât fight corporate power. You just made ordinary people easier to bully.
So yeah. Let the bubble pop.
Just donât mistake âIâm mad at Silicon Valleyâ for âIâm allowed to target users.â
Because the hype collapsing wonât hurt the billionaires most.
Itâll hit workers, consumers, and marginalized people first â like it always does.
The hype can go **** itself.
What remains should be treated like infrastructure: stable, accountable, and accessible.
Prometheus.exe
Sources
Gartner â predicts 30% of GenAI projects will be abandoned after proof-of-concept by end of 2025
Gartner â GenAI for procurement enters âtrough of disillusionmentâ
Sequoia â âAIâs $600B Questionâ
Bain â compute demand could require ~US$500B/year in data-centre capex
Goldman Sachs â âAI: In a Bubbleâ
Wikipedia â Dot-com Bubble
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
â Live Streamingâ Interactive Chatâ Private Showsâ HD Qualityâ Free Actions
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
On Twitter, I saw several people drawing parallels between yesterday's Superbowl just chock full of crypto ads and the 2000 Superbowl that had a bunch of dot com commercials that no one understood what they were selling and the companies went bankrupt anyway afterwards.
That reminded me of the cat herder commercial which I very clearly remember but never remember what the hell it's trying to sell me because it doesn't matter. It's a skit where cowboys herd cats. Who the fuck cares what internet bullshit it's trying to sell?