#cplusplus

Raj Gyana

Merried young. Cpl

Frm surat

Travel plan

2/3 june mumbai

4/5 june pune

a queue that is sorted by priority,

histogram that counts all the values ​​in each "bucket,"

object-oriented Tic-Tac-Toe, with classes Game, Board, and Players who had to compete against each other until a winner was determined

I was so scraed that i had a whole ass anxiety attack 2 days before but now that i've done it, it was alright. I was allowed to google things and i chose Java as my language as it is the one i am most familiar with. We will see about the talk i will have with my instructor but let's not think about that now.

ALRIGHT SO

The behavior I want to talk about here is related to this proposal which was accepted into the standard for the... 2020 version? I think?

The behavior in question is the idea that, if you have a type whose copy constructor takes a nonconst reference to the object being copied, and try to aggregate it into a type like std::tuple, the program (prior to C++20) would not compile. The reason this happens is because std::tuple's copy constructor takes a const reference to the tuple being copied, but constness can't be upheld if the objects being stored in the tuple themselves are mutated upon being copied.

The proposal in question says that this behavior is dumb and in this case (like the code I wrote above) the program should still compile as long as no copies of the tuple in question take place.

According to the cpp compiler support table, GCC has "partial support" for this feature and clang has "full support."

However, if you try to compile the above program with, say, "g++ -Wall -Wextra test.cpp" you'll find that it works just fine. This isn't surprising, "partial implementation" means some instances of this behavior should work but what IS surprising is it even works if you do "g++ -std=c++17 -Wall -Wextra test.cpp" which... what? Isn't that before the feature was... implemented?

Okay whatever but what IS strange is that if you run "clang++ test.cpp" you get a compilation error??? I thought clang was supposed to fully support this feature?

(This is on g++ v15.2.1 and clang v21.1.6)

So yeah idk what's going on here lol :3

📚 Dive into C++ in 2025! 🖥️

Hey coding enthusiasts! Ready to elevate your C++ skills this year? Check out our list of the 9 Best C++ Book Deals in 2025! 🎉 Each book is packed with knowledge to boost your programming prowess. 💪 Find your perfect C++ companion here. Happy reading! 🌟

coding #books #cplusplus