Itâd be funny if it werenât so sad. Evidently Americaâs foremost scientific agency needs Leonhardt to prepare the political ground for them before announcing new guidance by nudging liberals to relax their hypercautious expectations a bit. And the expectations for summer camp really were hypercautious. Even by CDC standards, wanting kids aged two and over to mask up outdoors, in the heat, and to social distance as much as possible while at camp with friends was a ludicrous, borderline punitive expectation.
Thank goodness Leonhardt intervened when he did or else our science bureaucracy might have insisted on masking toddlers during games of tag after all. Hereâs the new guidance:
About 2.5 million adolescents in that younger age group (12-15) have already had one dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, said Erin Sauber-Schatz, team lead for CDCâs Community Interventions and Critical Populations Task Force, which wrote the guidance.
âWe have this whole group of adolescents who by mid- to late summer can be fully vaccinated. ⌠Camps are at a point where they can offer an opportunity to have a camp setting where everyone is fully vaccinated,â Sauber-Schatz said, adding that such a scenario can enable a âpre-pandemic camp experienceâ with neither masking nor physical distancing.
Of course, many camps serve younger children who cannot yet be vaccinated, and for those settings, the guidance became somewhat more complex. At camps where not everyone is vaccinated, the guidance says, vaccinated people do not need masks. But unvaccinated people are âstrongly encouragedâ â though not obligated â to wear masks indoors, and they should wear masks outdoors in crowds or when close to others for prolonged periods.
In other words, vaccinated teens can go nuts and drop all rules whereas unvaccinated younger kids are okay to skip masks outdoors unless theyâre all huddled together in a crowd and to skip them indoors at their own risk. (Which isnât much.) Much more sensible. But thereâs one thing I still donât understand. Watch this short clip from May 11, when Walensky testified about how much her 16-year-old son looks forward to camp every year â and how he wouldnât be going this summer.
On the day before she made that statement, the FDA approved Pfizerâs vaccine for ages 12 to 15. It had already been approved for 16-year-olds, which means her son had presumably already been eligible for the shot for awhile. (Unless he turned 16 very recently.) So why was she talking doom-and-gloom about not sending him to camp when (a) he was either already able to be immunized or would be soon and (b) just 17 days later her agency would end up dropping all summer camp restrictions for vaccinated teens? âItâs just disturbing that they do such a 180 in [a few] weeks, which I think undermines the trust that people have in public health recommendations,â said the editor of JAMA Pediatrics to WaPo. âTo me, it reiterates what has been disturbing to me about this pandemic from the beginning, which is that kids have been an afterthought.â
