My post-ep-6 Caine: incredibly limited mental input because of unintended design constraints, narrative focus was FunnyBunny
*writes Cornered
My evolving fic writing on Caine pre-ep-8: ok so this was a simulation that the company was actively working on, let’s derive angst from that
*writes the Aviary and It’s Only Read Only
My new conception of Caine now that we know none of this was intended to exist: HOLY CRAP THATS SO MUCH WORSE ISNT IT but I still wanna work on the middle one, my previous Caine?? Like I know I can do both but being tugged between the two and at the same time puzzling over why the sheer intensity of the canon dynamic doesn’t override the other one more.
Or maybe one isn’t strictly a lot more ‘intense’ than the other? Just different? Idk I don’t know these things.
Trying to write an introduction to the ‘simulating hot chocolate’ post I made a little while ago, because like the one about how autistic understimulation might have played a role in being deaf to their problems, which required some mods in POV to make sense as fic, that one is gonna need it as well.
IMG ID: excerpt that reads, mid-sentence,
exactly the way the humans do. We don't perceive time the same.
Humans describe things to me nowadays like time, stretching or going by faster, depending on their emotional state. This is fascinating, but since I can't peer directly into their mind files without at some level risking destabilization, I can't gain any insight into the mechanism behind this.
Brief periods or very small plucking don't appear to do any harm, but | have no idea how far I can go before that starts to be in play.
END IMG ID
Also not sure what to title it. It would be kind of funny to name it something as innocuous as “Hot Chocolate” given the depth of the subject matter, but maybe something like “What’s in Your Cup of Hot Chocolate?” Nah that sounds menacing, like he’s drugging them or smth.
“The Art of Speaking Liquid into Existence”
that’s almost right but seems even a little OTT. Esp with the Bible reference. What do you think?
Also kind of an issue that the entry wouldn’t be about how he did it, but rather how he feels about it.
Still, maybe workable.
I also can’t decide whether I’m going to include going into the natural question of, why didn’t he ever mention or try to take credit for creating all of this.
Obviously from a writer’s/Doylist perspective, it was merely withheld to be a twist, a subversion of expectations
But why would a (supposedly) egotistical man conceal this information for 2 decades.
I’m sure somebody could come up with a super compelling reason for doing so, but I’m coming up short.
Maybe I’ll just file it away for a 2nd (related?) oneshot, or a comic.












