#aggressive language

Why are you wearing glasses?  

No, seriously.   Why the fuck are you still wearing glasses?  

The epidemic is over.  I don't know anyone who worries about nearsightedness anymore.  Do you hear anyone talking about it?  Do you see nearsightedness germs flying around?  No, because it's OVER.  

Look, I don't know how to break it to you, but a thin piece of glass in front of your eyes isn't going to help protect you from macular degeneration.  It's a false sense of security, an illusion; like if you just keep looking through them you can pretend that the world has crisp sharp edges.  Well, guess what?  The world is blurry.  You don't know where empty space ends and your body begins.  In fact, it doesn't.  Your body is mostly empty space.  

Everything happens for a reason, anyway; so if you get into an accident because you can't drive without your glasses?  Tough cajones; take your punishment like God intended.  It's your fault for having bad genes, which you got because of... original sin, or something.  I don't know, I didn't actually read the Bible.  I just believe vehemently in every word of it, except the words you use to disagree with me.  Because that's wrong.  

I don't think I'm doing anything wrong by yelling at glasses-wearers on the street.  It just fills me with such visceral, incandescent rage when I see a pair of pince-nez balancing on someone's nose.  It's like they're sending a direct fuck-you to people like me, who choose not to wear glasses.  So of course I have to yell at them; it's just simple self-preservation - if I don't, pretty soon everyone will be wearing glasses, and ganging up on those of us that don't, because we're "jeopardizing public safety" or "a danger to the common good."  I don't need to listen to that.

When you declare you're on the opposite side from me with that flag you wear right on your face, you shouldn't be surprised when I treat you like an enemy.  "What sides?" you ask?  "There's no 'sides' here; everyone is just choosing-" oh, shut up.  You're so naive.  Of course there are sides.  There's sides to everything.  What about a circle? you say.  Inside and outside.  There.  Now don't you feel stupid.  

i’m guessing this is about my “cap 2 is shit” post? Well Here We Go:

Why Captain America: Winter Soldier Is Shit:

OVERHYPED. Before I saw the movie (three times with my friend because it was her birthday and she paid for it because back then I loved Steve Rogers [not anymore. thanks cacw & fandom]) tumblr was just a FuckBoy about it. Going on and on about how it was the greatest movie ever. That no other movie compared. (I’m sorry? But, The Help, Miss Congeniality, White Chicks, The Blind Side, and Speed are all better movies.) When I saw the movie, I was expecting a lot of awesome shit, with a lot of depressing shit in return.

EMILY VANCAMP INTENDED TO BE LEADING LADY. Emily VanCamp’s Sharon Carter was announced as the co-lead next to Chris Evan’s Steve Rogers when the movie was first announced. Instead they gave her characterization and lines to Scarlett Johansson’s Natasha Romanoff (around the same time the fandom was asking for a Black Widow movie - almost like Marvel thought if she got a co-lead the fandom would shut up - which actually kinda worked).

FUCKING TIMELINE IS SHIT. Zola’s involvement with the Winter Soldier makes no sense what-so-ever. Zola was on the team that created The Winter Soldier even though he was captured almost immediately after Bucky fell to his death. But Zola explains that HYDRA rooted themselves throughout S.H.I.E.L.D. and the U.S. government, and that he himself had a key role in this conspiracy. This means when he was captured he quickly was released and went back to working for HYDRA in a secret capacity.

FAILED BECHDEL TEST. Natasha, Sharon, and Maria are seen in the movie (test 1: It has to have at least two [named] women in it). Only Natasha and Maria have scenes together, and while they talk to each other (test 2: Who talk to each other) , it’s about Nick Fury (test 3: About something besides a man). Effectively failing the third test.

the next points are nit-picks.

NIT-PICKY HISTORY SHIT. During Zola’s presentation, it is shown that, when SSR becomes SHIELD in 1945, and it’s ZIP code 20595. The United States Postal Service did not start using ZIP codes until 1963. And the Captain America display should be in the National Museum of American History instead of the National Air and Space Museum shown in the previous scene (with the Spirit of St. Louis, etc).

NIT-PICKY TECHNOLOGY SHIT. During the Zola scene, the computer monitors show news headlines and stories that elaborate on past events Zola tells our heroes about. But these are “black and green” monochrome computer monitors; they would not have been able to produce full colored images like this, let alone with the crisp HD quality they are presented in.

OTHER NIT-PICKY THINGS. Triskelion S.H.I.E.L.D. HQ building, the latitude/longitude are given as “38N 53'33.78” 77S 3’ 38.91". Longitude is given in ‘E’ or 'W’ (East or West), not ’S’ (South).

most of all:

i made the autistic zuko post because i am neurodivergent and possibly autistic and see myself in him, and because my fiance is autistic and was the first one to point this interpretation out to me

despite its lighthearted tone it’s not made to make fun of autistic people, it’s made bc it’s an interpretation with a lot of evidence and it’s not a fucking crime for neurodivergent and autistic ppl to want to see themselves in characters lmao

i’m sorry for the aggressive language but this happens literally every time that post goes around, ppl crowd my ask box telling me i’m not being “serious enough about a serious condition”