✧ i was the admin ✧

thank you ! as soon as i realized that including image descriptions was a thing (a very important thing, at that), i started doing it. i’m glad you enjoy the blog ♡

2020: twentytwENBY (and we vote)

yes ! i will schedule it asap.

thank you for the message. i used to agree, but image descriptions are necessary to make the account accessible and inclusive.

(i am supine-aesthetic btw this is just my admin account)

@sunmoonstars here are two options, both are the same price with free shipping .. i’ve never used either website so i don’t know their credibility/trustworthiness so be aware of that risk too lessfly: https://www.lessfy.top/New-Problem-Child-Hoodie-p17418.html super susa: https://www.sss919.com/Problem-Child-Hoodie-p110994.html

https://www.yesstyle.com/en/info.html/pid.1066948936?cpid=1066948935&gclid=EAIaIQobChMIi7ST5a7m2wIVQzuBCh2_twFtEAkYBCABEgIBzfD_BwE

~ the second ones, sold by madeinrainbow on etsy: https://www.etsy.com/listing/387004940/converse-shoes-hand-painted-rainbow?gpla=1&gao=1&&utm_source=google&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=shopping_us_b-shoes-unisex_adult_shoes-sneakers_and_athletic_shoes-other&utm_custom1=ab65bf84-930a-4216-96a1-fb34fbf3c5f2&gclid=EAIaIQobChMIwvn-kazS2wIVQVuGCh10BwOXEAkYCSABEgIbafD_BwE

just because someone stopped identifying as bi doesn’t mean that bisexuality is not valid, it doesn’t mean that they were lying or faking, it doesn’t mean anything other than they changed or their comfort with certain terms changed or something different. no one other than that person gets to decide what terminology to use for their romantic and sexual orientations, and no one gets to gatekeep or make up rules for how someone of a certain sexuality has to act. bi people can have gender preferences! bi people can be single or be in qprs or be in poly relationships! bi people don’t have to have “experience” with multiple genders to be “sure” about their bisexuality! people can change their identity to bisexuality or from it, it’s not up to you.

:)

- thank you for tuning in

<p>1) i didn’t take this photo. <br /> 2) it had already been edited from the neutral colours to the orange (again, not by me). <br /> 3) the only source of the photo that i could find was the flickr user, though i’m not convinced the photo is theirs either. <br /> 4) yes, it wasn’t okay for the photographer to put the fish in a lightbulb. however, i am not fully convinced that this isn’t completely edited and that they aren’t real fish. in the event that it is the real photo, feel free to bring up your concerns with the photographer, rather than with me.