My favorite part of prolife posters is that most are made using stock images of medically aborted feti and embryos to make examples of life and none of them seem aware of it. They always post pictures of messy stillbirths and call it the average abortion when this is really a lot closer.
Most of the images of abortion victims pro-lifers use are those from surgical abortions, not RU-486 abortions. In surgical abortions, the child (fetus) is cut, torn, and vacuumed. It does get bloody.
I do not know the story of this particular embryo. In many cases, researchers have been able to use small cameras to get great images of living preborn humans in the womb.
I’m not entirely sure what your point is.
sorry, didn’t mean the abortion where you take a pill as “medical” I meant, you appropriate images of wanted pregnancies that have been lost or stolen. I meant an abortion performed by a doctor. Because also, these would need to be done surgically since the pill the pregnancy is usually expelled at home, therefor not retrieved.
As for prenatal camera menCool story bro, did you know that fucking around with an occupied uterus is risky when you want to carry to term? there is a reason we dont all go home from prenatal visits with a clear snapshot of our kids. Any lil bother with the cervix or amniotic sack could cause miscarriage. So even if those “live photos” you are talking about are real (because i tried to look up if it was possible, couldnt find it in the heap of antichoice propaganda, weird its almost like antichoice people keep information from people)they would still be putting the pregnancy at risk for your needs. By your logic, you are exploiting a child.
Anyway, my point was, this is what real abortion or miscarriage typically look like, and i find it funny you don’t recognize a real abortion when you see one because this embryo is super duper dead (spoiler, humans are not grey or white, we are *edit* we have red and pink undertones cuz like, blood, so are our feti and embryo) not only that, the eyes are clouded and there is no umbilical or amniotic sack…sooo….yeah super duper dead. There is a small possibility it was a miscarrige but 99% of these images are taken in medical labs where they get their specimens from
I had no “point” i dont think this proves whos right one way or another. I just think its funny you dont know the source of the media you use to fuck with people. Sorta like the horton hears a who thing
Can we talk about how this can’t possibly be a three week old fetus? At three weeks pregnant, the thing (I can’t remember what it’s called) hasn’t even began to split. It’s virtually just a clump of cells, not something with eyes and a forming body? This is more like an 8 week old fetus..
I think it's called a zygote, the fertilized egg is and that would be what hasn't split yet.
















