subjay

I understand that they should be banned if they promote ship discourse or dark content in the game, but how can someone who is not breaking the rules be banned for being a darkshipper or proshipper? This shouldn’t count as an bannable offense at all.

For this reason, I'm hesitant to share my Roblox, New Club Penguin, Toontown Corporate Clash, and Animal Jam usernames due to antis who think people should be banned for having a different opinion on fiction and shipping.

If you're a darkshipper or proshipper, I strongly advise you not to give out your users for Roblox, Toontown Corporate Clash, or Animal Jam because the creators and moderators of Toontown Corporate Clash will simply IP ban you and ban your Toontown Corporate Clash account even if you didn't break any rules and played normally, and antis will look for ways to get you banned even if you did nothing wrong.

For example, I've seen antiship players of these online games claim that it's acceptable for nostalgic adults to play, but that it becomes unacceptable if the nostalgic adult turns into a proshipper or darkshipper to those antis.

It's really embarrassing that they devote so much effort to eliminating proshippers and darkshippers but not child predators or other dangerous individuals from their games.

When I was a kid we didn't have to worry about being banned for thinking that people shouldn't be harassed over fiction and ships, I miss the days when I played Roblox, Webkinz, Build-A-Bearville, Animal Jam, Toontown Online, and the original Club Penguin.

"dni proship" aw dangit

Children die, death/murder is not an adult topic.

The Troubled Teen Industry exists, child trafficking is not an adult topic.

Children get raped, sexual assault is not an adult topic.

Children have alcoholic parents, addiction is not an adult topic.

Children get beat to the point of hospitalization at school, that level of violence is not an adult topic.

why r they telling the truth????

Sorry... I... Had... Died... Aswell...

Pronouns

An accent

it's always entertaining watching antis pretend to know better than licensed professionals.

1: people can and do "sexualise their trauma" to cope. if a rape victim wants to use cnc to help them cope with trauma (e.g. moving on from it, recontextualising views on sex/themselves/their relationship to sex, or as a way of taking back control in a consensual and safe environment) they are fully within their right to do so. people cope with trauma in many different ways, and yes, some of those coping mechanisms may seem "icky" — but you cannot police how people cope with their own damn trauma.

2: were you there when this imaginary person's therapist told them how to deal with their trauma? no? then you don't get to comment on how they deal with their trauma, or what their therapist wants them to do or intends for them to do.

3: sometimes "exploring [trauma] safely" means fantasising about it/things similar to it, or "romanticising" it. that doesn't work for you? cool, but it does work for others. not all victims are the same, not all trauma is the same, not all coping mechanisms work for everyone. humans are extremely complicated creatures, and we'll all have different ways to cope — your experience is not universal.