I’m always wary of assigning moral or philosophical positions based on aesthetic ones
this includes cybertrucks and landlord white and AI art by the way. You need a better criticism than just “it’s ugly”
Cosmic Funnies

JVL
AnasAbdin

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣

Kiana Khansmith
NASA

Janaina Medeiros
🪼
Today's Document
ojovivo
will byers stan first human second

Discoholic 🪩

⁂
Claire Keane

titsay
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ

Origami Around
Game of Thrones Daily
seen from T1

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Honduras

seen from France

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Peru

seen from United States
seen from Bulgaria
seen from Austria

seen from United States
seen from Chile
seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Germany
@snissel7
I’m always wary of assigning moral or philosophical positions based on aesthetic ones
this includes cybertrucks and landlord white and AI art by the way. You need a better criticism than just “it’s ugly”

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
I’ve realized a fundamental problem with tumblr is that only person whose posts I consistently want to see are mine
i get why people don't believe in marriage as a social construct but legally it is the best and easiest way to say "this is who i trust to take care of me when i can't take care of myself" and i'm so glad gay people fought for that right bc when shit gets scary at least i know im in good hands
This is how I convinced my conservative grandma that the gays do also need marriage, actually. My grandad died when I was 4 and I asked her to imagine not being allowed to see him or make decisions for him or be entitled to an inheritance and she got very quiet and conceded the point. Marriage doesn't intrinsically mean anything but as a legal framework it is really, really important
I wish all the “religion is inherently bad” people who go on to describe issues exclusive to Christianity would understand that their idea of Christianity being analogous to all religion is a very glaring sign that they are still steeped in the Christian hegemony they seem to reject so vehemently
I saw once a post that was like “So, what do yall think about religion? Personally I think all religion is fundamentally misogynist” and it’s like girl. Do you know what “fundamentally” means? Or “religion” or “misogynist” for that matter??
got assigned to inventory the castle stores anda solid 70% of the barrels are labelled miscellaneous this is not a system

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Please stop being nonbinary too. God only created one gender. You must conform to that.
THERES ONLY ONE NOW?????
yes, and every time you complain we take one away
it's important to have your own unique door knock so people know it's you. a knock consists of stressed knocks, unstressed knocks and silences. as the creator of this system and thus the first person to note down my knock, i will claim the knock consisting of only silences (it's a zero-based index). Now would you please answer the door
I wholeheartedly support this system and as such I would like to claim the knock consisting of two bouts of silence
You know it only really just occurred to me that I don’t HAVE to identify with any political identity, like I’m allowed to just exist with my own opinions without a label for them.
It’s such a strange time to have this realization too tbh, like it wouldn’t be far fetched to say there’s a huge expectation nowadays that you have to subscribe to SOMETHING. But truth be told I dont align with any political identity, and at the end of the day I think that’s fine. I know what I believe in and that’s enough to make my choices.
I have this one discord friend who find like, eating in general to be a very unpleasant sensory experience. For a while this actually really bothered me until I realized that “how can you not like this Thing which is so important to me and everyone around me?” is the exact same instinct behind ace- and arophobia
Oh, this definitely belongs on Tumblr.
From the Nib, by Mattie Lubchansky

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
we need fewer songs about falling in love and breaking up and MORE songs about famous disasters of the sea
being told you’d cruise the seas for american gold you’d fire no guns, shed no tears, now you’re a broken man on a halifax pier might not be a universal experience, but like neither is the club. so a little perspective might be nice
And I think we've all faced the feeling that we've lost all hope, and might really benefit from an encouragement to rise again, rise again, though your heart it be broken, or life about to end. No matter what you've lost, be it a home, a love, a friend, like the Mary Ellen Carter rise again... that might resonate
there's a simply incredible amount of posts where my only reaction is just "wow. I like neither of you, somehow."
I saw someone being rabidly gaylor so I went to check out their blog out of academic curiosity and you know what I found? Gaylor. endless self-reblogs of nothing but gaylor. There are exactly two braincells in this person's mind and one is "Taylor Swift" and the other is "Is Gay" and friend they are working overtime
pick whatever option the person you're following who reblogged this post didn't pick. if they didn't say in the tags what they picked or if you're seeing the original post and not a reblog, pick at random instead.
first option
second option
the most valueable skill a white leftist can ever learn is how to take an L with grace.
You gotta be able to take an L if your moral and ethical belief systems are to be capable of guiding you. Otherwise you just have an idealized self where you get really mad and scared when anyone points out it isn't actually you. How the fuck are you gonna walk the walk if you can't handle being told when you are not, in fact, actually walking it
you cannot just socially transition into being a good person you are going to have to settle for being a messy human being who has to try and fail and keep trying to get better like everyone else. yeah even when it's embarassing and sucks for you a lot.
Ya gotta learn to earnestly and honestly say "Oh shit, my bad."
And to then end the sentence there, not launch into a paragraph of explanation or panicked super-apology.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
remembering this one time my father, a devout catholic who thinks of himself as progressive and believes in evolution etc, where we were arguing about "souls" and he was saying obviously animals don't have souls but humans do. and i said well you believe evolution happened. and he said yes. and i said so at some point as hominids were evolving did they just develop souls when they got 'human-like' enough? and without skipping a beat he said, yeah, at some point god said "okay you seem enough like humans" and a non-ensouled primate gave birth to an ensouled human child. and that's why humans have souls.
The Lord of the Rings takes place in a world that’s analogous to Medieval England, and yet there’s New World crops like potatoes and tobacco. That’s not actually a plot hole: Tolkien himself explains, in the prologue to Fellowship, that pipeweed has been brought from overseas by Numenorians, it follows that hobbits came by potatoes the same way.
But the Hobbit and the early chapters of Fellowship contain much more jarring and numerous anachronisms than post-Columbian-exchange plants. There are metaphors referring to gunpowder, guns, a train engine and express trains! There are commodities that are from the Old World, but were not widespread in Medieval Europe, such as coffee, tea and fireworks. Even silk might be a bit of a stretch. And then there are tons of things that could or technically did exist in a medieval world, but we definitely associate them with later eras: top hats, public museums, clocks small enough to put on a mantelpiece, football, golf, mothballs, umbrellas, metal pens, water bottles instead of waterskins, Christmas crackers, and then there’s the entire question of the hobbits’ written culture. Paper appears widely available and cheap, not everyone is literate but there seems to be a large literate middle-class that owns multiple books, has long legal battles with paperwork involved, sends tons of letters, sends written party invitations, uses anachronistic pre-cut envelopes. Letters aren't carried by random servants, there's an official postal service and a post office: this all implies a level of literacy and written culture more typical of an Early Modern-ish setting. Or Regency? Or Victorian? But definitely super not Medieval.
Conclusion one: when Tolkien started writing The Hobbit he very much did not know where he would end up, which is thematically appropriate.
Conclusion two: Tolkien semi-intentionally wrote the Shire as low-tech but still very recognisably similar to modern England, so that the hobbits leaving its safety to enter an Actual Fantasy World would feel more relatable. (LOTR is a portal fantasy.)
Conclusion three: these are not the aspects of worldbuilding that actually matter, it is actually good that Tolkien is obsessed with mythology and linguistics and only sketches the rest of the worldbuilding out as far as it's necessary for the plot, no need to sweat the small stuff. You should only write about agriculture and taxation if you care about them as much as Tolkien cared about unhinged comparative linguistics.
Conclusion four: in a Watsonian sense, we can take on the conceit that Tolkien didn't write the books, only translated them from a real source, the Red Book of Westmarch. We may then proceed to blame any perceived inconsistencies on his translation.