a recurring theme ive noticed is that when it comes to conflicts israel is a part of, israel only wins if it totally destroys any belligerent parties. meanwhile, in order for said belligerents to be "victorious," all they have to do is survive. i genuinely don't understand how ppl can hold such radically different standards for two groups and continue to take themselves seriously
dont forget that they also proceed to tell u "ummm y r u measuring success by how much u managed to destroy??" 1 breath after stating that rates of destruction = implied success :( like idk what kind of planet u have to live on to think that a country that is forced to parade the image of its leader in the form of cardboard because hes either too disabled or too afraid to come out of the bunker, is the country that somehow WON the exchange jasdhbfasdjkhb
