i was gonna text veronica but i might as well post it for the rest of you. after having finished the good noticings segment on the wedding. THEY predicted on a previous episode that MSG was a hoaxâperhaps a red herring. so i was eager to hear how they explain how it wasnât a hoax. which, like for 24 hours after it happened i assumed the posts were jokes. i was really shocked. so letâs get out of the way that reason #1 why she did this was to prank us.
a couple of their takes, as i remember them (veronica please add anything im forgetting, once you listen)
- madison square garden was her taste all along (claire: and therefore this is an authentic expression of taylor swift ashley: yeah i know but that sucks)
- it was a curated disney world experience of eg an awards show put on for the guests, hence why so many random celebrities (i buy this and more or less see the vision)
- she works (for now) with travis because he has allowed and encouraged her to âwin,â which has a culture in sports but no analog in the arts, especially in music (this is a really good and interesting insight but i donât think it explains as much about the wedding)
- no one can imagine a taylor swift who is historically contingent, which is to say, truly she could have had anything in the world, but she chose instead to marry some guy, and he has at least some preferences or ways of being in the world. has no one considered that taylor chose to be married at madison square garden because itâs a place her man has heard of?
- my initial thought was that this whole thing must have felt to gaylors like âeat the cakeâ felt to the hive, not that itâs the first time lol, but let me elaborate because i know youâre the audience that remembers and understands. when drunk in love came out and everyone was like :/ but like maybe she doesnât know?? maybe itâs all on him? then like the first time they performed it live she did that line herself?? (not the topic of this wedding but donât forget to remember that when that horrible manâs ass is finally drug up on his own diddy trial). anyway basically just rubbing it in the face of her weakest and longest suffering fans
- so is that why karlie was there? when i first heard she was there i had to google it because i thought i misheard. and iâve googled it a couple of times since to make sure.
- hereâs where i disagree with the girls: i donât think eg blake and margaret werenât there because of their relationship with taylor. in particular this piece of information does make me think maybe thereâs a part of the joke that hasnât dropped yet. however also if i was either of them i would not want to go!
- whichâ the star of the show, the margaret qualley jack antonoff separation?? one other thing clashley has said several times i think is that margaret qualleyâs public persona is entirely governed by her insecurity about lena dunham. and like HELLO?? iâm sooo happy for lena dunham. in love, looks amazing, book taken seriously, and the skinny girl is suffering. she earned this!!. but also good for margaret, taking the moment. if she gets a gf right now sheâll really have one over on taylor.
- atulya shared the old malcolm harris m/j post (âis she really going to have to slouch like that next to him for her whole lifeâ đ) and she was like do you think they saw this? and 1. absolutely jack antonoff saw this malcolm harris post and 2. but this is obviously about lena dunham at taylor swiftâs wedding . however i told her not to post that, these people invented having shooters
eta i do also think taylor does a certain amount of things for the content. itâs weird that she has a reputation for writing songs-about and yet people arenât considering maybe she wants to write a divorce album? i look forward to her divorce album. it wonât be as good as whatever the fuck lana is going to do in ten years but. the truth of the matter is that women canât write music for normal women to attach to without getting married and divorced. lana knows this at least!