I stay silly

like, if this was as is likely a cis woman with PCOS - imagine how it would feel to reach out for rape counseling and then being immediately accused of being trans/told you are not welcome. pretty monstrous right?

Rowling is as mean and cruel spirited as the characters in her books are

Before you make fun of Lindsey Graham’s death, ask yourself if Donald Trump would mock the death of somebody he disagreed with and whether Lindsey would make excuses for that mockery.

And, I'm gonna be honest, I believe them. Specially since they were only saying they got paid $2-5 each.

Did this change the outcome of the election? Who knows. But it's still a massive problem. And I can't help but feel that if the Republican candidate were being accused of this, the media would be more willing to talk about it.

OP only wants Republican fraud prevented and prosecuted.

The problem is MAGA continues to lie about election fraud past every and any investigation if it doesn't return results they like while repeating baseless or nonfalsifiable tweets trying to invalidate our entire election system.

We literally can't say 2020 was a peaceful transfer of power because of MAGA.

But even if it was a riot, it's odd that the people who wanted to overthrow the government left all their guns and home and didn't kill anybody, isn't it?

It's okay. You're allowed...encouraged, even!...to question your programming.

"I didn't feel like a woman/girl"

You can't feel like a sex because they're not emotions or sensations. It's just a state of being. You're just uncomfortable and unhappy with gender roles forced unto you.

I can assure you most people, especially women, aren't happy with these roles either.

Not feeling "feminine" or not subscribing to sexist gender roles doesn't make you not a woman.

But no, when that perception is sex (which you have no baseline capability of understanding anyway), it's suddenly stunning and brave and OBVIOUSLY is the body that's wrong this time!

"I didn't feel like a woman/girl"

You can't feel like a sex because they're not emotions or sensations. It's just a state of being. You're just uncomfortable and unhappy with gender roles forced unto you.

I can assure you most people, especially women, aren't happy with these roles either.

Not feeling "feminine" or not subscribing to sexist gender roles doesn't make you not a woman.

But no, when that perception is sex (which you have no baseline capability of understanding anyway), it's suddenly stunning and brave and OBVIOUSLY is the body that's wrong this time!

The information is really easy to find. Here's a handy link for you.

Before you say this is only an estimate, as USAID was focused in many cases on disease prevention, it is not possible to have a concrete figure. You would be asking for the impossible if you wanted a precise figure.

In fact, Impact Counter is such an obvious misinformation campaign that even a blind and stupid government body like Congress called it on its partisan bullshit.

I'm not doing "vibes politics", thats you and your ilk, its probably the reason you violent fucking animals cheer like baboons when an attempted assassination happen. No, I'm being flippant and dismissive of an obvious lie.

Ok having read the letter, it takes three pages to give one concrete criticism. The rest of its claims it doesn't really substantiate, but I'll let that go seeing as it's just a later.

The concrete criticism:

“Dr. Nichols wrongly calculates malnutrition-related deaths by dividing total federally appropriated funding by average per-child treatment cost, ignoring that not all funds directly reach treatment and that potential reach isn’t the same as actual impact.” 

And that's genuinely fair. That's a good criticism. I would agree under that methodology the number of children that have starved to death is smaller than they claim.

Idk if "The number of children we caused to starve to death is smaller than you said" is really a good look but it is something!

Nothing about the deaths caused by ending malaria or aids prevention of course, that's swept under the rug. But this is still more than I expected.

That being said, your concession of the "starving children" allegation being exaggerated from Impact Counter, while also ignoring the issue of Impact Counter likely using the same flawed methodology (assuming any methodology is used, this being Democrat slop and all) to achieve their desired lie for HIV and malaria is telling of your bigotry.

And thats just the start of your troubles with this source. You still have issues around attribution, meaning you have no evidence that directly links any death to USAID cuts. Theres also the issue of how Brooke Nichols and Impact counter rely on estimates not observed data, meaning that there is no actual body linked to these estimates they're modeled off past data.

the bottom line here doesn't change: Impact counter isnt a source of information, its misinformation at best, leftist propaganda tripe at worst. If Brooke Nichols isn't going to be transparent about her bullshit, then it should be ignored.

Hey look, it's that literally impossible standard of evidence I said you'd ask for! Are you getting your answers from an LLM? It's hard to imagine a human making that mistake.

Except USAID cuts leading to deaths was the entire claim of the initial post. Maybe some observable data, not estimates, would help with that "impossible" standard you pretend exists.

Also are you using an LLM?