1. Its a pro life group, and if you have to look in every horse mouth before you know if you are allowed to listen, then understand you aren't thinking, not even critically. You are doing the equivalent of checking a social credit score. You are socially seeing how who you are hearing aligns with you before you allow yourself to listen, think, and agree or disagree.
2. No. Because its a fucking comic. You understand how representation works right?
3. It could be a real life experience dramatized in comic book form. Or it could be merely representative but if you think that there isn't someone who wanted to be a father upon hearing that their partner, spouse or etc was pregnant then, you are simply delusional. What is depicted here does happen.
4. Exactly what it does. Its rhetotic. It's meant to convince on the basis of sympathy.
And this is why I don't like most of you. You cannot look at abortion as abortion you have to feel around it rather than directly address the philosophical position.
1. You check your self socially first.
2. You completely deconceptualize and deconstruct the reality out of it. Which is to engage a blank out.
3. You imply motives which after you have destroyed what you have heard and seen only who you are talking to, assume malice.
4. You attack the very act of which all of us engage in.
This is epistemological failure on your part.
And my major point is that abortion is not good in itself. It's a painful choice in defense of one's life and values which are and should be the center of your life. You guys need things to be 0 harm to everyone with every choice. The harm reduction ethics you practice is a race to the bottom.
"get over it" you say to a man who wanted to be a father because in your effort to reduce suffering you have to pretend that he cannot possibly suffer. You have to deny rather than address.
