Keni

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda
wallacepolsom

Kiana Khansmith
ojovivo
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH

@theartofmadeline
Claire Keane
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
RMH
occasionally subtle

#extradirty

izzy's playlists!
Sade Olutola
Misplaced Lens Cap
trying on a metaphor
seen from TĂĽrkiye
seen from Netherlands

seen from Poland
seen from Hong Kong SAR China
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Brazil
seen from United States

seen from Germany
seen from Malaysia
seen from Germany
seen from Malaysia
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Netherlands
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Poland

seen from United Kingdom

seen from T1

seen from Canada

seen from Slovenia
@prolife-problems

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
instagram.com/rehumanizeintl
Also if part of your pro-life attitude is to shame single mothers and people who got pregnant outside of marriage, you know you're helping no one. You know you're making everything worse for nothing. You know that, right?
Â
Four of the six Planned Parenthood clinics in Iowa and four in Minnesota will shut down in a year, the Midwestern affiliate operating them said Friday, blaming a freeze in federal funds, budget cuts proposed in Congress and state restrictions on abortion. The clinics closing in Iowa include the only Planned Parenthood facility in the state that provides abortion procedures, in Ames, home to Iowa State University... "We have been fighting to hold together an unsustainable infrastructure as the landscape shifts around us and an onslaught of attacks continues," Ruth Richardson, the affiliate's president and CEO, said in a statement.
...the bill contains provisions that have alarmed health care advocates since they first showed up in earlier versions of the bill. Among them is a plan seeking to defund Planned Parenthood, which the organization warns will affect its ability to provide critical services, including pap smears, cancer screenings, and birth control. But on Thursday, two last-minute additions went even further: The reconciliation bill that was passed now seeks to ban Affordable Care Act health care plans from covering abortion and gender-affirming care for all Medicaid patients, including adults, after initially proposing to ban care for just minors.
So there you have it. Planned Parenthood was already on life support and if the "Big, Beautiful Bill" passes it will effectively pull the plug on their finances. More clinics will need to close whether Megan Thee Stallion likes it or not. What gets downplayed (or left out entirely) by major newspapers is that as clinics close, more babies live.
The analysis of birth data found that in the states with abortion bans, the rate of births per 1,000 women of reproductive age increased by 1.7 percent more than would be expected from previous years’ data... In states with abortion bans, that increase translated to 22,180 more births than expected, the researchers said.
You won't find anyone in the media doing follow-ups with these 22,180 children. No one will attend their 1st birthday party or ask the mothers if they regret having them. The media has decided it's just better not to say anything. Unless it's a horror story about a woman who couldn't get an abortion it's a non-story. No one in the major media outlets will admit that's how it works, of course, but that is how it works.
Twenty two thousand one hundred and eighty. Per state if I'm reading that correctly. That's what banning abortion does. Twenty two thousand lives that would have been murdered in the womb are now going to live. That's amazing. That's awesome, in the original definition of inspiring awe.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
[ID: an X comment from a user whose name is blocked out says the following: "If I was a baby I would much rather never be born than to live a short life of disease and pain where I never even get to learn to read or speak." Secular Pro-Life replies with the following: "Deeply troubling and dehumanizing when able-bodied people imagine what it's like to be disabled, don't bother to consult any actually disabled people, and decide it's a fate worse than death. Yet continually that's the process I see when people defend abortion for fetal anomaly."]
Also, palliative and hospice care is a thing. You can learn more at carryingtoterm.org.
"If we stop abortions of unhealthy fetuses then infant mortality will increase" and if we treat child cancer patients then teen mortality will increase...
Christian pro-life advocate and law professor, Dr Joanna Howe has won the anti-bullying case she brought against her employers at the Univer
“Since 2019 I have endured six workplace investigations because of my advocacy and research on abortion and in every investigation I have been cleared of misconduct,”
Howe stated that she had endured six separate workplace investigations since 2019 regarding her pro-life research. She was found innocent of misconduct in each case, including the most recent investigation launched at the beginning of the year, which determined she was innocent of any breach in the Australian Code for Responsible Research.
Seems universities really don’t like when you conduct research on abortion if it’s not going to swing in favor of the pro-abortion stance.
Pro-lifers really need more discernment about “the abortion pill.” Misoprostol is largely used to help women with missed miscarriages pass their pregnancies. I myself had to take it when I had my miscarriage, because my body was still progressing the pregnancy as if the baby was still alive and would not clock that my pregnancy should end. (When the baby was finally released, she was like a tiny gummy bear floating in a giant bubble. The sac was clearly still developing past her death.)
So when I see pro-lifers fearmongering about pharmacies offering “the abortion pill,” I just have to scratch my head. The issue isn’t that this medication is available to women who need it; the issue is that it’s also used to murder healthy babies. Tackle the wrong reasons misoprostol is prescribed, not the fact that it can be accessed at all. If you don’t make this distinction, then you’re only feeding into the pro-choice argument that women need abortion rights to treat miscarriages.
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
This is a bad idea but:
Do you think someone should be allowed to get an abortion on the basis of the fetus's sex? (a mother aborting all daughters because she wants a son, for example)
Yes, also I'm pro-choice
No, also I'm pro-choice
Yes, also I'm pro-life
No, also I'm pro-life
Fetuses do not have hair

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Frustrating…
Hey, I'm stumped on this objection, if it's alright, I want your input on this
"For these types of people I always give them a hypothetical situation for them answer So if you knew your wife was going to die by giving birth to the child would you let Your wife get an abortion or would you let your wife die in the child grow up without a mother?"
What do you think?
I would answer that the choice is never actually that simple. We imagine this cinematic moment where the doctor comes out to talk to the anxious husband in the waiting room and says “Sir, we can only save one of them. Should we save your wife or your child?” and he has to make that choice.
That makes a very dramatic movie scene, but it’s not real.
There are three categories of “life of the mother” situations:
1. Very early pregnancy. Mother has a life threatening condition and cannot be kept stable until the child reaches viability (now around 22 weeks with evidence-based best practices). Even in these situations, a direct abortion isn’t the life-saving care. Usually we’re talking about the mother needing a treatment for her life-threatening condition that risks the life of the baby. Most ethical choice is to treat the mother. If the baby dies as a result of the treatment, that is a tragic loss. If the baby doesn’t die, awesome! In this category, there is no way to save the baby without saving the mother, because if the mother died, the baby would too. Ectopic pregnancies fall in this category because there is currently no way to save the baby. If we developed the ability to get ectopic embryos to successfully re-implant in the uterus, that would become the ethical option.
2. Late-term complications. I’m going out of order here for a reason. This is anything where the mother’s life-threatening health issue starts after viability, but especially when we’re talking 30 weeks and on. Baby’s chance of survival with an early delivery goes up rapidly as baby approaches full term. In these cases, if the mother needs immediate treatment for a life threatening issue, she doesn’t actually need her baby to die. There is no reason to choose between the mother and child. A C-section is actually safer than a late-term abortion, since third trimester abortions usually still involve the mother laboring and delivering a dead baby. If the concern, as posed in the original hypothetical, is that she would “die by giving birth,” then she probably just needs a C-section (or a better doctor).
3. The third category is the most complex one. This is when the life threatening issue for the other begins when the child cannot yet survive outside the womb, but may be able to in a few weeks. This is where the difficult decisions are made. This category includes women diagnosed with cancer who might decide to delay treatment to protect their child until their child can be safely delivered. However, even here we can see examples of mothers who choose to receive treatment without first killing their child, and doctors who find innovative ways to treat life-threatening illnesses without harming preborn children.
The true answer is “save them both.” We can’t always - just as any doctor knows in a triage situation they can’t always save all the patients. The decision of who to save is never based on which patient is more human, more valuable, or more worth saving. The answer is instead based on how the doctor can save the greatest number of patients. If the doctor can save everyone, they do. If the doctor knows a course of action means for sure saving one patient, while another might not make it, but the alternative is losing both, then they will choose to save at least one. We almost never see a situation where the doctor has to arbitrarily choose between two patients - the decision is always based on the condition of each patient, the resources available, how much time there is, etc. There are algorithms for this kind of thing.
Basically I refuse to let unrealistic hypotheticals dictate actual policy on saving children.
Because people believe in the “we can only save one, choose!” scenario, we get doctors telling women that they will die if they don’t get an abortion, and then they cry to the media that they had to go to Colorado or California to get their “life-saving procedure.” The reality is that either the doctor could have treated the mother without first killing the baby and given the baby a chance to survive, or they could have delivered the baby and then treated the mother.
Anyone who says they couldn’t do the first option under ____ state abortion law is either lying or ignorant. If the mother’s condition is actually life-threatening, every state allows doctors to treat the mother. Killing a child doesn’t cure any illness.
Literally no one in the pro life movement actually believes miscarriage care, ectopic pregnancies, and pregnancy complications are equivalent to abortions. That’s a pro choice fantasy. Here’s proof from the laws themselves:
Credit to Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life
Simply, the unintentional death of the fetal-stage human, due to complications, including unsuccessful surgery intended to save the fetus, and the removal of said body, is NOT the same thing as intentionally poisoning/burning or dismembering it while alive.
So no, no actual pro-lifer is going to advocate for jailing your female relative, neighbor, coworker, etc for having a miscarriage and needing survival removal to prevent infection. Or whatever. Because that's not what "abortion" means as relating to pregnancy. Stop the fear-mongering and word-smithing. It's not going to make abortion morally acceptable.
“I cannot pretend prochoice vs. prolife is about women versus babies. It isn't. It is about society versus families.
Abortion doesn't save women. It doesn't stop or fix rape. It doesn't end poverty. It doesn't stop domestic violence. It doesn't do anything except undo women's healthy biology, kill her child, and send her right back to whatever circumstances she came from.
Sure, if she just doesn't want to be pregnant, it ends pregnancy. Why doesn't she want to be pregnant though? The replies are along the lines of, "Fuck you. It doesn't matter. It is her choice and right." Ok. Thank you for telling me you care about abortion, not women.
This is what is being offered as the savior for women? This is our freedom? This is our equality? This is the answer we are being offered for children living in poverty, abuse, or neglect? Just pre-emptively guess their fate and kill them? This is what we are being offered as a way to address maternal mortality? Don't attempt to make advancements that address complications that arise in pregnancy, just blame women's biology and kill her kid?
I do not accept that this is the best we can do for women, children, or families. I do not accept that to be free, equal, and safe women have to turn against their biology and their children.”
– Robin Atkins

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Parents have rights, but they also have an obligation to their children. Everyone believes that child abuse and neglect is wrong. If a child is hurt by the parents, or if the parents fail to feed, clothe, and shelter their child, the fault lies not with the child for making demands, but with the parent for not providing what the child needs to survive. Parents who do not have the desire to care for their children have the duty to transfer those parental responsibilities to someone who can fulfill them.
This obligation exists no matter how young the child is. A parent must care for their ten-year-old, two-year-old, two-month-old, one-day-old, and for the child who is still living in the womb, because the child is the same individual whether living outside or inside the womb. There is no minimum age at which the parent's obligation does not exist.
For the first nine months after conception, normal human development involves the child getting nutrition and shelter from their mother's womb. The mother has the same obligation to care for a child two months after conception as she does two years after conception, but for roughly the first nine months of a human's development, there is no possible way to transfer that parental responsibility to any other individual. If the child's demands cause strain upon the mother, the community has a responsibility to provide her the help that she needs to keep the child alive, but the mother does not have the right to end the child's life. The child's demands for age-appropriate food and shelter are not unreasonable, and the parent has an obligation to fulfill them. Refusal to do so is a failure of parental responsibility.
It’s so frustrating when people bring up their pro choice views in inappropriate settings. Like damn sorry you’re mad that a committee in your state is trying to combat infanticide, but we’re actually at work. We’re in an office, right now, and you’ve decided to violate the social contract so that I look like the jerk if I voice polite disagreement. You don’t know who has trauma surrounding childbirth or lost pregnancies. Maybe don’t bring up hot button political issues when I’m trying to discuss receivables