Interpreting asoiaf as a story about the eventual triumph of a chosen bloodline to the point where everything their ancestors ever did is retroactively completely justified to get them to that point is just so profoundly whatever. The only two characters in the main series who really believe that are like Viserys III (wrong) and Melisandre (double wrong.)
âTargs and Valyrians keep apocalypsing themselves and then when given the chance to build something better on the ashes of the old world, fail to do so. Dany is interesting because sheâs the last one, and as a teenage girl, someone who the dynasty wouldâve completely discarded in her own right. But the narrative points at her and says because of that sheâs the first one that might get it right. Daenerys is a hero largely because of her own choices. Ones she makes largely because of an upbringing removed from the power, privilege, and mythology of her family.
The dragons died in the Dance because the Targaryens used their incomprehensible power to start a realm destroying civil war, and war is bad (even if Rhaenyra was obviously wronged) not because the world lost Rhaenyraâs âblooming fertility.â The purpose of the Amethyst Empress myth is to counterbalance the Azor Ahai one so we know that what one culture calls benevolent patriarchal self-sacrifice another calls murder. Question more things that the narrative tells you. I think youâre supposed to.