Your story can lie to the reader, but make sure it's lying to the reader on purpose.
ojovivo
h

Kiana Khansmith
occasionally subtle
Interview Vampire Daily
𩵠avery cochrane š©µ

shark vs the universe
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH

pixel skylines

Discoholic šŖ©

izzy's playlists!
Fai_Ryy
Sweet Seals For You, Always

⣠Chile in a Photography ā£
Noah Kahan
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
Aqua Utopiaļ½ęµ·ć®åŗć§čØę¶ćē“”ć
Keni
RMH

seen from Australia

seen from Argentina

seen from United States
seen from Indonesia
seen from Ukraine
seen from Bangladesh
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from Uruguay
seen from Singapore

seen from Saudi Arabia

seen from Australia
seen from Australia

seen from United States
seen from Brazil
seen from Brazil
seen from Pakistan
seen from France
seen from Pakistan
seen from Guatemala
@omgcelticseasalt
Your story can lie to the reader, but make sure it's lying to the reader on purpose.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Incredibly violent take of mine but I actually donāt think you need to relate to a story in any way to enjoy it. You can enjoy a story even if you canāt point at a character and insert some aspect of your personality or identity into them. In fact I would argue the need for a character like that to be present in every single story you experience is a sign of stunted growth.
It is a peaceful and serene take, actually.
been thinking a lot about how smallness and "make me feel small and take care of me" narratives in a romantic context are indicative of the ways in which fatness is excluded from being protected, cared for, and precious specifically in a romantic context. The ways we speak about being romantically cared for, especially as a lover girl, have always felt so coded to exclude me and bodies like mine. For me, being small would require me to shrink and I simply don't want to. In fact I would like to be treated as precious and worthy of protecting just as I am. I would like to continue to take up space and still have arms wrap around me. And this all just feeds into larger narratives of fat people being treated as unworthy, undesirable, disposable etc.
unfortunately i dont think its queerbaiting if the creator is just so terminally heterosexual that they never remotely considered the same gender relationship their show is centered around could be read as romantic. it is deeply painful however.
Maybe accidental queer baiting? The way someone may not mean to say something rude, but it may come off rude, so it's rude. Frustrating either way.
Not being a dick, just a friendly clarification.
By definition you can't accidentally queerbait. Queerbaiting is specifically using a same sex pair from the show to market the show to queer audiences with no intention of ever following through on a romantic relationship.
There is officially licensed Destiel merch signed off on by Kripke. Teen Wolf had a commercial with the actors for Derek and Stiles draped over each other talking about being "on a ship." Both shows actively used scenes between them as marketing while actively mocking fans for wanting them together. Sherlock has multiple characters refer to Johnlock as a couple, including characters we're supposed to believe are never wrong about human behavior and pushed those scenes in marketing. Then they acted insulted when fans saw them as a couple.
That's queerbaiting.
Done on accident it would just be queer subtext. Done because they had no other choice due to censorship is queer coding.
The specific meaning of the word is really starting to get lost and it's a pretty important one to keep accurate. It describes a very specific phenomenon that was done repeatedly and maliciously for decades and is meant to examine that specifically.
Doing it on accident sucks, but it isn't a tactic of capitalism intentionally intended to suppress queer representation while making money from queer fans.
Reblogging to keep the accurate definition and examples of queerbaiting circulating in the world
If THE modern translator of the OG Odyssey text wrote this about my film adaptation Iād kill myself
Emily Wilson youāre goated
"There are no sex scenes, and all the food looks horrible."
Like, he's already dead, Emily! š
Seriously, if I read nothing else about it, that line alone would make my choice to skip it.
@yixiaosuige

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
idk i think you should make this character's heterosexuality relevant to the narrative. i mean why are they cis if it's not servicing the plot. you can't just throw story elements in for no reason if you're gonna make an able bodied character it should really serve a purpose. like why are they white are you just trying to fill a checklist? :/
@thistooishomestuck
"The ONLY way to become less anxious about/afraid of/triggered by something is to engage with it; avoiding it literally reinforces the fear" and "being FORCED to engage with it also reinforces the fear" are both true at once. 9 out of 10 girlies with trauma hate me for saying this. I am getting cancelled on instagram, tiktok, and yelp. Unfortunately, I am right.
Sometimes people write characters as more progressive than they are shown in canon because they are tired of seeing them written as less progressive than they are shown in canon.
Sometimes people write characters as more progressive than they are shown in canon because they want to imagine a world where those characters had the opportunity to learn about those particular topics and honestly believe it would be in character for them in that case.
Sometimes people write characters as more progressive than they are shown in canon because they are playing dolls with characters and fanfic is something they write for free.
Sometimes people write characters as more progressive than they are shown in canon because canon didn't explore every aspect of that character's life and there's honestly no reason to state there's no way the character knows about that gender/sexuality/disability advocacy group, or that if they have the money or time that they wouldn't donate to an advocacy group that is relevant to their lives.
Sometimes people write characters as more progressive than they are shown in canon and it's still not as out of character as claiming Eric Cartman would tell you he uses any pronouns and thank you for asking, so people should really consider that saying characters wouldn't be that progressive while also saying that "he wouldn't say that" is a failure to consider what would make him say that is pretty damn hypocritical.
Sometimes people just interpret canon or characters differently from you and that doesn't mean they are wrong and it's pretty arrogant to claim that means they are writing fic "out of character".
thinking about that time someone told me it didn't matter if they made their OC "a seraphim" [sic] because "Jews didn't invent angels"

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
commenting under art of a thin character "oh they look like they give the most dogshit hugs. like being embraced by a wet skeleton"
Overlap between antiblackness and antisemitism in fandoms:
- Jewish-coding and Black-coding ignored and erased e.g., characterās experiences are intentional allegory for Jewishness or Blackness, but people insist itās about queerness instead.
- The desire to see Black and Jewish characters humbled. This is usually in retaliation for some perceived wrong due to a white character. Gets worse if said characters are successful in their fields, then itās portrayed as āpunching upā.
- Ethnic features being erased (skin lightened, curly hair straightened, slimmer noses ect).
- Discussions about antiblack/antisemitic tropes in fandom spaces dismissed because āreal bigotry is more importantā (āreal bigotryā is then never discussed).
- When the main characters are Black/Jewish and yet the fandom wonāt stop talking about that fucking white guy.
- Black/Jewish characters made out to be mean, usually depicted as bullying the poor white character (bonus if the āagonisersā are men).
- Infantilisation specific to non-white characters.
And god help you if a character is a Black Jew...
devastating when good characters are put into a stupid show. you were born to fly but that evil hag of a showrunner clipped your golden wings. be free on ao3, my little dove. be free
How many times are we going to do skinny Carrie
sometimesā¦ā¦.things that are fanonā¦ā¦ā¦are worse

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
I donāt like this actually
This is depressing does anyone else find this depressing
I would actually make the argument that the heart of the problem here is not either about fans, as the article claims, or production companies being exploitative cowards, as some of the comments are claiming. The heart of the problem is the increasingly eroding privacy we are seeing in the modern age.
There's some people in the comments saying "fandoms have always been like this" and others saying "No, it's worse than it was." And both are to some extent right. Fans (or at least a small percentage of fans, and the larger a fanbase gets the larger a group this will describe) have always been Like That; but they did not always have the level of access to creators and actors that they have now.
The notion that a performer needs to be constantly available to public scrutiny, that their personal information should by default be available to any rando with google, is pretty new. It used to be that actors would only be expected to engage with the public on limited, specific, and controlled occasions, usually with security provided. Now they're being asked to rawdog exposure to the mob 24/7 on their own.
(Also, production companies have always always always been exploitative cowards, just to get that straight; reading the biographies of literally any actress from golden Hollywood years makes that clear. It's just, again, more public now.)
There has also been a negative feedback loop as fandoms come to realize that the constant access they have to creatives increases their leverage and power. It did not use to be the case that this was so; fandoms pre-internet largely worked under the assumption that they didn't really have any meaningful way to contact or influence the publication houses. Even if they sent a letter or a campaign of letters, they wouldn't even know whether the letters were being received or read unless the publishing house chose to respond. So, without that expectation of access, the drama usually stayed internal. Nowadays, with constant immediate feedback from creators and publishers, fans are ever more incentivized to act out to try to push an agenda, get attention, or just vent whatever is going on in their lives onto a face contractually obliged to be friendly to them.
Not leaving this in the tags
Bringing it back bc still very valid