@theartofmadeline
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
EXPECTATIONS
wallacepolsom
The Bowery Presents
Andulka
tumblr dot com
roma★
taylor price
pixel skylines
oozey mess
d e v o n
macklin celebrini has autism
Cosmic Funnies
ojovivo
Love Begins
untitled
The Stonewall Inn
Game of Thrones Daily
seen from Venezuela
seen from Venezuela
seen from Czechia
seen from United States
seen from Canada
seen from Colombia
seen from United States
seen from Iraq
seen from Bangladesh
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Germany
@notreallysureyett
Hi!
I'm not new to tumblr, just deleted my previous account.
I'm someone who holds a consistent life ethic; from conception to natural death
I am anti abortion, anti death penalty and anti euthanasia/assisted suicide
I'm not the best philosopher or debater, so if you're ask about why I believe these things I'll probably do a bad job.
*Libertarians DNI
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
atheist quarterback throws a hail darwin
agnostic quarterback throws a hail maybe
Protestant quarterback throws a Hail Christ Alone.
“Clump of cells”, “parasite”, “tissue”, “tumor”, “products of conception”, etc.
A man beating up a pregnant woman will be charged with assault and battery not attempted murder of a minor EVEN if he hits her stomach. Because all of your patriarchal pals and your patriarchal legal system AROUND THE WORLD knows it isn't a human until it's born.
Interesting how you highlight the legal system's flaws and in the same breath use it to defend your own favorite version of oppression
It's not even flat out true. From what I've found, Iowa is the only state with a clear cut law about recognizing only the mother as a victim in a violent crime. In the majority of the other states, there are separate charges for violent acts that injure/kill an unborn child. Eight states have partial coverage, dependent on fetal stage. Other states don't have a law, but I don't think that necessarily means you won't be given separate charges.
In federal and military crimes, the Unborn Victims of Violence Act comes into play, at any fetal stage.
But usually when a pregnant woman is a victim of a violent crime, the penalties are upped with regards to the crime. So no, it's not an attempted murder charge, but it's a recognition that there is a reason it's worse when you attack a pregnant woman. Wonder why.
Northern Ireland, Wales and England, Australia, and Hong Kong all have "child destruction" charges for causing the death of an unborn child, but it looks like it's usually after a certain point in the pregnancy, and they have to prove the assaulter intended to do it. Funnily enough, despite these laws, there have been some testimonies of women in those situations who mourn the loss of their child. Weird that knowing their unborn child wasn't human because they weren't born yet didn't help them. Weird how instead a lack of justice for their child hurt.
An incident in Japan is causing social and legal debates about their current legal system in regards to unborn victims.
The statement is truer on a global scale, sure, but if we're going with the "even the patriarchal world realizes it!" we could also look more into what a patriarchal world believes. Like how some very patriarchal worlds believe that women aren't human . .. . or are inferior to men . . . . I'm sure we want to trust their opinion on this matter, right?
I'd actually opt for the more feminist position here, which appears to be unborn victim laws. These laws are not just justice for the unborn victims, but for the mothers who then have to deal with the pain of losing a child. Or finding their child had received permanent damage, which can pain mothers, like it would with any other child who suffered a violent crime and survived. What mother wouldn't want justice in those scenarios? Really, the only reason to not support them is because you've based your belief of abortion on the legal system and introducing such laws might eat up ground there. Honestly, which is the more compassionate response- denying mothers justice for death or injury of their unborn child, or giving them that justice?
Rehumanize International's founder Aimee Murphy was just 16 when her rapist pressured her to get an abortion.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
as a child i assumed that martha’s vineyard was a fancy private vineyard owned by martha stewart and the reason rich people vacationed there was because they were friends with martha
The Eightfold AI lawsuit exposed what happens when companies treat employment decisions like ad targeting — and why the fix requires enginee
a bit more context
I've decided not to write a full-on review because this video (which I watched after reading) describes all my more in-depth problems
But tl;dr, the satire/introspection of contemporary Christian conservatism is horribly done, and nothing else in the book is done well enough to be labeled a Good Booktm, let alone get the masterpiece testimonials booktok people have been throwing at it. An exercise of nothing but liberal sadism. Impressive for a debut author in the way it's impressive when your child wins a competition.
If "Themes and Such" were a book
Making your covert sociopathic abusive narcissist character have the internal monologue of a Substack-having Liberal Woman was a very funny but unintended writing choice in Yesteryear
Currently reading
So far, as have read the first chapter
The protagonist, Natalie, is generally a pretty vile person. This is (so far) not a complaint. I'd call her sociopathic, but she's fairly well controlled in her external behaviours; psychopathic doesn't work as well, as she clearly has emotions.
I'm confused by the usage of ellipses: at times they indicate a passage of time or a scene change, but other times an interaction is happening immediately in real time (like when she's eyeing her content manager Shannon and then Shannon notices).
From the reviews I've read, I'm already starting off with a bad impression of the book. I regret reading the reviews prior, as I try to engage with things more with an open mind, but in my defense, I did not think I'd actually buy the book; it was a spontaneous decision.
I'm on the beginning of chapter 8, and since then there's been 3 chapters of the book about her backstory, and I kind of feel bad for the protag? Like the whole thing with her moving for college and having to confront people with different beliefs for the first time was somewhat relatable (I could understand but not relate to the roomate part though all my dorm roomies where my besties and uber respectful of my beliefs ♥).
Under the cut cause spoilers and it got long
I'm bored out of my mind and have no will to draw, so I guess I might finish the rest of Yesteryear tonight.
Currently on chapter 15, Natalie is not coping well with anything. Not just the Yesteryear world, like her whole life just seems to be her poorly coping. I think the story is better developing her at her as a fairly nasty person, like her being very dismissive of her sister's clearly abusive husband. The story teeters between her being a highly educated, cynical feminist-y woman and being a hard, unrelenting social conservative, and I mean this in a bad way. It's less of a nuance and more of a contradiction.
I read the world's driest sex scene (in a good way, it was very much so the point)
Also, for a supposed theology student at Harvard, Natalie perpetuates the "Mary Magdalene was a prostitute" myth. In another book, I would have taken this as a reveal that Natalie is not nearly as intelligent as she purports herself to be, but considering the author's admitted disregard for actual student religious behavior and practices, I read this as a mistake
Would you call being somewhat turned on by the prospect of having sex with your father-in-law incestuous? Pseudo-Incestuous?
"But how can you afford a lawyer?"
"That's your first question?"
Finished the book that night, uggh, will probably write a review on it later, maybe idk
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
As we know, of course, the apostle Paul did many terrible things before God saved him. Arson, murder, marijuana....
Marijuana?
2 Corinthians 11:25 "Once I was stoned"
Til there are some coastal morons in the PNW who blame seals and sea lions for fish scarcity and want to cull (hunt and kill) them??? Like what the frick? Seals only eat what they need to live lmao blame the giant fishing trawlers with the nets...
3rd seal this year was found with a gunshot wound...
Water equivalent of the farmers who want to hunt wolves and coyotes to extinction because they prey on their livestock.
Except that you can kind of understand the emotional draw of wanting to destroy something that can potentially hurt humans, but seal attacks aren't a thing.
Currently reading
So far, as have read the first chapter
The protagonist, Natalie, is generally a pretty vile person. This is (so far) not a complaint. I'd call her sociopathic, but she's fairly well controlled in her external behaviours; psychopathic doesn't work as well, as she clearly has emotions.
I'm confused by the usage of ellipses: at times they indicate a passage of time or a scene change, but other times an interaction is happening immediately in real time (like when she's eyeing her content manager Shannon and then Shannon notices).
From the reviews I've read, I'm already starting off with a bad impression of the book. I regret reading the reviews prior, as I try to engage with things more with an open mind, but in my defense, I did not think I'd actually buy the book; it was a spontaneous decision.
I'm on the beginning of chapter 8, and since then there's been 3 chapters of the book about her backstory, and I kind of feel bad for the protag? Like the whole thing with her moving for college and having to confront people with different beliefs for the first time was somewhat relatable (I could understand but not relate to the roomate part though all my dorm roomies where my besties and uber respectful of my beliefs ♥).
Under the cut cause spoilers and it got long
I'm bored out of my mind and have no will to draw, so I guess I might finish the rest of Yesteryear tonight.
Currently on chapter 15, Natalie is not coping well with anything. Not just the Yesteryear world, like her whole life just seems to be her poorly coping. I think the story is better developing her at her as a fairly nasty person, like her being very dismissive of her sister's clearly abusive husband. The story teeters between her being a highly educated, cynical feminist-y woman and being a hard, unrelenting social conservative, and I mean this in a bad way. It's less of a nuance and more of a contradiction.
I read the world's driest sex scene (in a good way, it was very much so the point)
Also, for a supposed theology student at Harvard, Natalie perpetuates the "Mary Magdalene was a prostitute" myth. In another book, I would have taken this as a reveal that Natalie is not nearly as intelligent as she purports herself to be, but considering the author's admitted disregard for actual student religious behavior and practices, I read this as a mistake
Would you call being somewhat turned on by the prospect of having sex with your father-in-law incestuous? Pseudo-Incestuous?
"But how can you afford a lawyer?"
"That's your first question?"
Currently reading
So far, as have read the first chapter
The protagonist, Natalie, is generally a pretty vile person. This is (so far) not a complaint. I'd call her sociopathic, but she's fairly well controlled in her external behaviours; psychopathic doesn't work as well, as she clearly has emotions.
I'm confused by the usage of ellipses: at times they indicate a passage of time or a scene change, but other times an interaction is happening immediately in real time (like when she's eyeing her content manager Shannon and then Shannon notices).
From the reviews I've read, I'm already starting off with a bad impression of the book. I regret reading the reviews prior, as I try to engage with things more with an open mind, but in my defense, I did not think I'd actually buy the book; it was a spontaneous decision.
I'm on the beginning of chapter 8, and since then there's been 3 chapters of the book about her backstory, and I kind of feel bad for the protag? Like the whole thing with her moving for college and having to confront people with different beliefs for the first time was somewhat relatable (I could understand but not relate to the roomate part though all my dorm roomies where my besties and uber respectful of my beliefs ♥).
Under the cut cause spoilers and it got long
I'm bored out of my mind and have no will to draw, so I guess I might finish the rest of Yesteryear tonight.
Currently on chapter 15, Natalie is not coping well with anything. Not just the Yesteryear world, like her whole life just seems to be her poorly coping. I think the story is better developing her at her as a fairly nasty person, like her being very dismissive of her sister's clearly abusive husband. The story teeters between her being a highly educated, cynical feminist-y woman and being a hard, unrelenting social conservative, and I mean this in a bad way. It's less of a nuance and more of a contradiction.
I read the world's driest sex scene (in a good way, it was very much so the point)
Also, for a supposed theology student at Harvard, Natalie perpetuates the "Mary Magdalene was a prostitute" myth. In another book, I would have taken this as a reveal that Natalie is not nearly as intelligent as she purports herself to be, but considering the author's admitted disregard for actual student religious behavior and practices, I read this as a mistake
Would you call being somewhat turned on by the prospect of having sex with your father-in-law incestuous? Pseudo-Incestuous?
Currently reading
So far, as have read the first chapter
The protagonist, Natalie, is generally a pretty vile person. This is (so far) not a complaint. I'd call her sociopathic, but she's fairly well controlled in her external behaviours; psychopathic doesn't work as well, as she clearly has emotions.
I'm confused by the usage of ellipses: at times they indicate a passage of time or a scene change, but other times an interaction is happening immediately in real time (like when she's eyeing her content manager Shannon and then Shannon notices).
From the reviews I've read, I'm already starting off with a bad impression of the book. I regret reading the reviews prior, as I try to engage with things more with an open mind, but in my defense, I did not think I'd actually buy the book; it was a spontaneous decision.
I'm on the beginning of chapter 8, and since then there's been 3 chapters of the book about her backstory, and I kind of feel bad for the protag? Like the whole thing with her moving for college and having to confront people with different beliefs for the first time was somewhat relatable (I could understand but not relate to the roomate part though all my dorm roomies where my besties and uber respectful of my beliefs ♥).
Under the cut cause spoilers and it got long
I'm bored out of my mind and have no will to draw, so I guess I might finish the rest of Yesteryear tonight.
Currently on chapter 15, Natalie is not coping well with anything. Not just the Yesteryear world, like her whole life just seems to be her poorly coping. I think the story is better developing her at her as a fairly nasty person, like her being very dismissive of her sister's clearly abusive husband. The story teeters between her being a highly educated, cynical feminist-y woman and being a hard, unrelenting social conservative, and I mean this in a bad way. It's less of a nuance and more of a contradiction.
I read the world's driest sex scene (in a good way, it was very much so the point)
Also, for a supposed theology student at Harvard, Natalie perpetuates the "Mary Magdalene was a prostitute" myth. In another book, I would have taken this as a reveal that Natalie is not nearly as intelligent as she purports herself to be, but considering the author's admitted disregard for studying actual religious behavior and practices, I read this as a mistake
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
i actually do think it’s bad how radfems consistently weaponize someone’s appearance against them especially those who are trans. you should be able to principally critique trans ideology on ideological grounds, not on the basis that some trans people are ugly to you. beauty politics is not our friend, it is first and foremost a weapon against women. we should not seek to wield it against others not matter how much we disagree with them.
speaking of avatar, wow the voice acting for Movie!Aang sounds horrible!
